Propafenone and valsartan overdose with cardiovascular deterioration managed with lipid emulsion and high dose insulin: a case report

AbstractThis is a case of a 23-year-old female who presented to the emergency department (ED) comatose after ingesting 7.8 g of propafenone and 11.7 g of valsartan. Upon arrival to the ED, the patient had seizures and required intubation. Several boluses of sodium bicarbonate were given as well as a continuous infusion to normalize QRS intervals. Norepinephrine and intravenous lipid emulsion (ILE) therapy were initiated. In the intensive care unit (ICU), the patient experienced persistent seizures and a 5-minute period of pulseless ventricular tachycardia. Subsequently, hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic therapy (HIET) was initiated. The patient received a 1 unit/kg intravenous bolus of regular insulin followed by a continuous infusion starting at 1 unit/kg/hr. Norepinephrine infusion was weaned off after 27 h of HIET. Within 48 h of presentation, the patient was transferred out of the ICU. This case exhibits the successful management of a mixed overdose with propafenone and valsartan utilizing a multimodal approach. In addition to supportive care, the patient received sodium bicarbonate, HIET, ILE and vasopressors to manage the cardiovascular collapse associated with these toxicities

Loperamide cases reported to United States poison centers, 2010–2022

Abstract Background Intentional use of high doses of loperamide has been linked to serious cardiac toxicity. The objective of this study is to investigate the characteristics and trends of loperamide cases reported to United States (US) poison centers and to evaluate the changes in reported loperamide cases following US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warnings, labeling requirements, and packaging restrictions for loperamide starting in 2016, with an emphasis on intentional exposures. Methods Data from the National Poison Data System were analyzed. Results There were 12,987 cases reported to US poison centers from 2010 to 2022, for which, loperamide was the most likely substance responsible for observed clinical effects. Although 46.1% of these cases were associated with minor or no effect, 13.4% resulted in a serious medical outcome, including 59 deaths (0.5%). Eight percent (8.1%) of cases were admitted to a critical care unit and 5.0% were admitted to a non-critical care unit. Among cases with a serious medical outcome, most were associated with loperamide abuse (38.0%), intentional-misuse (15.7%), or suspected suicide (27.5%). The majority (60.0%; n = 33) of fatalities were related to abuse, followed by suspected suicide (20.0%; n = 11) and intentional-misuse (5.5%, n = 3). The rate of loperamide cases per 100,000 US population reported to US PCs decreased from 0.44 in 2010 to 0.36 in 2015 (p = 0.0290), followed by an increase to 0.46 in 2017 (p = 0.0013), and then a trend reversal with a decrease to 0.28 in 2022 (p < 0.0001). The rate of serious medical outcomes related to loperamide increased from 0.03 in 2010 to 0.05 in 2015 (p = 0.0109), which subsequently increased rapidly to 0.11 in 2017 (p < 0.0001), and then demonstrated a trend reversal and decreased to 0.04 in 2022 (p < 0.0001). Conclusions FDA warnings, labeling requirements, and packaging restrictions may have contributed to the observed trend reversal and decrease in reports to US poison centers of loperamide cases related to intentional misuse, abuse, and suspected suicide. This demonstrates the potential positive effect that regulatory actions may have on public health. These findings contribute to the evidence supporting the application of similar prevention efforts to reduce poisoning from other medications associated with intentional misuse, abuse, and suicide

Hydrocarbon ingestions among individuals younger than 20 years old reported to United States Poison Centers, 2000–2021

Abstract Background Hydrocarbon-based products have many household and commercial uses and exposure to these substances is common. Severe clinical effects can occur if these products are ingested. This study investigated the characteristics and trends of hydrocarbon ingestions reported to United States Poison Centers. Methods Data from the National Poison Data System were analyzed for cases of hydrocarbon ingestion among individuals < 20 years old reported to United States Poison Centers from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2021. Results There were 284,085 hydrocarbon ingestions reported during the 22-year study period in which a hydrocarbon was the first-ranked substance. Most of these cases occurred among children < 6 years old (83.2%), males (64.6%), at a residence (96.5%), were single-substance exposures (98.3%), and were managed on-site rather than in a health care facility (74.9%). However, 4.5% of cases were associated with a serious medical outcome, including 34 deaths. Thirty-two deaths were among children < 6 years old and most were associated with aspiration. Gasolines accounted for 24.6% of total cases, followed by lubricating oils and/or motor oils (19.9%), other types of hydrocarbons (14.9%), lamp oils (11.3%), and lighter fluids and/or naphtha (10.3%). The rate of hydrocarbon ingestions among United States youth < 20 years old decreased significantly (p < 0.0001) by 66.5% from 2000 to 2021. The greatest rate decrease was observed among lamp oils (− 78.4%, p < 0.0001), followed by gasolines (− 75.9%, p < 0.0001). Conclusions Although the rate of hydrocarbon ingestions decreased during the study period and most reported cases resulted in non-serious outcomes, the number of cases remains high with a non-trivial minority (4.5%) of cases associated with a serious medical outcome, including death. Most deaths were among children < 6 years old. This underscores the need to increase primary prevention efforts, especially for young children

Health-status outcomes with invasive or conservative care in coronary disease

BACKGROUND In the ISCHEMIA trial, an invasive strategy with angiographic assessment and revascularization did not reduce clinical events among patients with stable ischemic heart disease and moderate or severe ischemia. A secondary objective of the trial was to assess angina-related health status among these patients. METHODS We assessed angina-related symptoms, function, and quality of life with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) at randomization, at months 1.5, 3, and 6, and every 6 months thereafter in participants who had been randomly assigned to an invasive treatment strategy (2295 participants) or a conservative strategy (2322). Mixed-effects cumulative probability models within a Bayesian framework were used to estimate differences between the treatment groups. The primary outcome of this health-status analysis was the SAQ summary score (scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status). All analyses were performed in the overall population and according to baseline angina frequency. RESULTS At baseline, 35% of patients reported having no angina in the previous month. SAQ summary scores increased in both treatment groups, with increases at 3, 12, and 36 months that were 4.1 points (95% credible interval, 3.2 to 5.0), 4.2 points (95% credible interval, 3.3 to 5.1), and 2.9 points (95% credible interval, 2.2 to 3.7) higher with the invasive strategy than with the conservative strategy. Differences were larger among participants who had more frequent angina at baseline (8.5 vs. 0.1 points at 3 months and 5.3 vs. 1.2 points at 36 months among participants with daily or weekly angina as compared with no angina). CONCLUSIONS In the overall trial population with moderate or severe ischemia, which included 35% of participants without angina at baseline, patients randomly assigned to the invasive strategy had greater improvement in angina-related health status than those assigned to the conservative strategy. The modest mean differences favoring the invasive strategy in the overall group reflected minimal differences among asymptomatic patients and larger differences among patients who had had angina at baseline

Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease

BACKGROUND Among patients with stable coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia, whether clinical outcomes are better in those who receive an invasive intervention plus medical therapy than in those who receive medical therapy alone is uncertain. METHODS We randomly assigned 5179 patients with moderate or severe ischemia to an initial invasive strategy (angiography and revascularization when feasible) and medical therapy or to an initial conservative strategy of medical therapy alone and angiography if medical therapy failed. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest. A key secondary outcome was death from cardiovascular causes or myocardial infarction. RESULTS Over a median of 3.2 years, 318 primary outcome events occurred in the invasive-strategy group and 352 occurred in the conservative-strategy group. At 6 months, the cumulative event rate was 5.3% in the invasive-strategy group and 3.4% in the conservative-strategy group (difference, 1.9 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8 to 3.0); at 5 years, the cumulative event rate was 16.4% and 18.2%, respectively (difference, 121.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 124.7 to 1.0). Results were similar with respect to the key secondary outcome. The incidence of the primary outcome was sensitive to the definition of myocardial infarction; a secondary analysis yielded more procedural myocardial infarctions of uncertain clinical importance. There were 145 deaths in the invasive-strategy group and 144 deaths in the conservative-strategy group (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.32). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with stable coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia, we did not find evidence that an initial invasive strategy, as compared with an initial conservative strategy, reduced the risk of ischemic cardiovascular events or death from any cause over a median of 3.2 years. The trial findings were sensitive to the definition of myocardial infarction that was used