16 research outputs found
Impact of timing of delivery for type 2 diabetes on perinatal outcomes
Aims: To compare obstetric and neonatal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who had scheduled delivery at full term (≥ 39 0/7 weeks) compared to early term (37 0/7 – 38 6/7 weeks) for T2DM indications. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study that included all singletons with T2DM with a scheduled delivery at a single tertiary care center between January 2008 and March 2022. Outcomes were compared using Fisher's exact test. Results: 107 singleton pregnancies were included. There was no significant difference in primary cesarean delivery between the two groups. The early term group had significantly higher rates of NICU admission compared to the term group (52% vs 32%, p = 0.05, OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.0–5.0), a finding that remained statistically significant on adjusted analysis (adjusted OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.04–7.58). Conclusions: In singleton pregnancies undergoing scheduled delivery for T2DM-specific indications, early term deliveries were associated with significantly increased odds of NICU admission when compared to term deliveries, even after adjusting for surrogate markers of glycemic control. These findings suggest that early term delivery contributes to risk of NICU admission, rather than the indication for delivery itself. These findings should be replicated in a larger cohort
Recommended from our members
Implementation of Evidence-Based Cervical Ripening Protocol: Outcomes and Next Steps
Recommended from our members
Implementation of Evidence-Based Cervical Ripening Protocol: Outcomes and Next Steps
Recommended from our members
Mode of delivery and neonatal outcomes with early preterm severe preeclampsia: does fetal growth restriction matter?
Severe preeclampsia diagnosed at or prior to 34 weeks is an indication for preterm delivery. Many patients with severe preeclampsia develop fetal growth restriction as a result of the placental dysfunction associated with both conditions. The ideal mode of delivery in cases of preterm severe preeclampsia with fetal growth restriction remains controversial, with providers often proceeding directly to cesarean delivery rather than attempting a trial of labor due to theoretic concerns about the harms of labor in the face of placental dysfunction. There are limited data supporting this approach. This study evaluates whether the presence of fetal growth restriction affects the ultimate mode of delivery or neonatal outcomes among pregnancies with severe preeclampsia undergoing induction of labor at or before 34 weeks.This was a retrospective cohort study of singletons with severe preeclampsia undergoing induction of labor ≤ 34 weeks at a single center between January 2015 and April 2022. The primary predictor was fetal growth restriction, defined as estimated fetal weight < 10th percentile for gestational age on ultrasound. Mode of delivery and neonatal outcomes were compared between those with and without fetal growth restriction using Fisher's exact and Kruskal-Wallis tests, and multivariate logistic regression was used to obtain adjusted odds ratios.159 patients were included (N = 117 without fetal growth restriction, N = 42 with fetal growth restriction). There was no difference in vaginal delivery between the groups (70% vs 67%, p = .70). While those with fetal growth restriction had a higher incidence of respiratory distress syndrome and longer neonatal hospital stay, these differences were not statistically significant after adjusting for gestational age at delivery. There were no significant differences in other neonatal outcomes, including Apgar score, cord blood gases, intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, neonatal sepsis, and neonatal demise.For pregnancies complicated by severe preeclampsia that require delivery ≤ 34 weeks, the likelihood of successful vaginal delivery following induction of labor does not differ based on presence of fetal growth restriction. Furthermore, fetal growth restriction is not an independent risk factor for adverse neonatal outcomes in this population. Induction of labor should be considered a reasonable approach and should be routinely offered to patients with concurrent preterm severe preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction
Recommended from our members
Early Onset Severe Hypertensive Disease in Pregnancy and Screening for Antiphospholipid Syndrome
Recommended from our members
Early Onset Severe Hypertensive Disease in Pregnancy and Screening for Antiphospholipid Syndrome
AbstractObjective Although preterm delivery (PTD) before 34 weeks for severe hypertensive disease is a diagnostic criterion for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), there is no consensus regarding testing for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in this setting. We aim to describe the frequency of and the characteristics associated with inpatient aPL testing in this population.Study Design In this retrospective study of PTD before 34 weeks for severe hypertensive disease, charts were reviewed for aPL testing, gestational age at delivery, fetal complications, and severity of maternal disease. Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Fisher's exact, and chi-squared tests were used for analyses of continuous and categorical variables, and multivariate logistic regression for adjusted odds ratios.Results Among 133 cases, 14.3% had APS screening via aPL testing. Screened patients delivered earlier than unscreened patients (28.9 vs. 31.7 weeks,p<0.001). Each additional week of gestation was associated with a 39% decrease in the odds of screening (95% confidence interval: 0.43–0.85). There were no other differences between the groups.Conclusion APS screening after PTD for severe hypertensive disease is uncommon but more likely with earlier PTD. Despite conflicting recommendations from professional organizations, prior studies demonstrate contraceptive, obstetrical, and long-term risks associated with APS, suggesting that we should increase our screening efforts
Recommended from our members
Immediate Postpartum Breastfeeding Following Pregnancy with Cardiac Disease
This study aimed to identify predictors of immediate postpartum breastfeeding among women with maternal cardiac disease (MCD). This study included all gravidas with MCD who delivered at a single institution from 2012 to 2018. Charts were abstracted for maternal demographics, obstetrical outcome, cardiac diagnoses, cardiac risk stratification scores, and prepregnancy echocardiogram findings. Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare the breastfeeding (BF) group versus the nonbreastfeeding (NBF) group. Logistic regression was used to obtain odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Among 211 gravidas with MCD, 12% were not breastfeeding at the time of postpartum hospital discharge. Compared with the BF group, the NBF group had a significantly higher proportion of women with cardiomyopathy (21% NBF vs. 7% BF, OR 3.44, 95% CI 1.12-10.71), with modified World Health Organization (WHO) classification ≥III (33 vs. 14%, OR 3.16, 95% CI 1.22-8.15), and with prepregnancy ejection fraction (EF) < 50% (55 vs. 14%, OR 7.20, 95% CI 1.92-27.06). There were otherwise no differences between the two groups with regards to other cardiac diagnoses or cardiac risk scores. In women with MCD, cardiomyopathy, modified WHO class ≥III, and a prepregnancy EF < 50% were associated with NBF in the immediate postpartum period. These findings may guide providers in identifying a subset of women with MCD who can benefit from increased breastfeeding counseling and support.· Eighty-two percent of patients with cardiac disease are breastfeeding at the time of postpartum discharge.. · Cardiomyopathy is associated with an increased odds of not breastfeeding at postpartum discharge.. · Rationale for not breastfeeding is infrequently documented in the medical record.
Outcomes of Monochorionic, Diamniotic Twin Pregnancies with Prenatally Diagnosed Intertwin Weight Discordance
ObjectiveMonochorionic, diamniotic (MCDA) twin pairs are predisposed to various pregnancy complications due to the unique placental angioarchitecture of monochorionicity. Few studies have evaluated the outcomes of weight-discordant MCDA pairs without selective fetal growth restriction (SFGR) or the risk factors for development of SFGR. This study aims to describe the natural history of expectant, noninvasive management of weight-discordant MCDA twins and to evaluate risk factors associated with progression to SFGR.Study designThis was a retrospective cohort study at a single, tertiary care center in the United States. All MCDA twins with isolated intertwin weight discordance (ITWD) ≥ 20% diagnosed before 26 weeks' gestational age (GA) were included. The primary outcome of descriptive analyses was overall pregnancy outcome, incorporating both survival to delivery and GA at delivery, as defined by the North American Fetal Therapy Network. The secondary outcome was SFGR in one twin (defined as estimated fetal weight < 10% for GA) and factors associated with this progression. Only those with fetal ultrasound (US) within 4 weeks of delivery were included in this secondary analysis.ResultsAmong 73 MCDA pairs with ITWD, 73% had a good pregnancy outcome, with dual live delivery at a median GA of 33 weeks. Among the 34 pairs with adequate US follow-up, 56% developed SFGR. There were no differences in GA at delivery or discordance at birth between those who did and those who did not develop SFGR. There was a nonsignificant association between increasing ITWD at diagnosis and subsequent development of SFGR.ConclusionExpectant, noninvasive management can be considered in MCDA twin pregnancies with ITWD ≥ 20% diagnosed before 26 weeks. This approach is associated with a good pregnancy outcome in the majority of cases, even after the development of SFGR in the smaller twin.Key points· Nearly 75% of weight-discordant mo/di twins have a good pregnancy outcome.. · Weight-discordant mo/di twins deliver at a mean gestational age of 33 weeks without invasive therapy.. · Noninvasive management should be considered for weight-discordant mo/di twins.