18 research outputs found

    Synthesis and characterization of a novel chemically designed (Globo)3–DTPA–KLH antigen

    Get PDF
    In recent years, many experiments have been conducted for the production and evaluation of anticancer glycoconjugated vaccines in developed countries and many achievements have been accomplished with Globo H derivatives. In the current experiment, a new chemically designed triplicate version of (Globo H)3–diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA)–KLH antigen was synthesized and characterized. Immunization with (Globo H)3-DTPA-KLH, a hexasaccharide that is a member of a family of antigenic carbohydrates that are highly expressed in various types of cancers conjugated with DTPA and KLH protein, induced a high level of antibody titer along with an elevated level of IL-4 in mice. Treatment of tumors with the collected sera from immunized mice decreased the tumor size in nude mice as well. None of the immunized mice illustrated any sign of tumor growth after injection of MCF-7 cells compared to the control animals. These findings, based on the newly presented structure of the Globo H antigen, lend exciting and promising evidence for clinical advancement in the development of a therapeutic vaccine in the future

    Development of Novel Prime-Boost Strategies Based on a Tri-Gene Fusion Recombinant <i>L. tarentolae</i> Vaccine against Experimental Murine Visceral Leishmaniasis

    Get PDF
    <div><p>Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a vector-borne disease affecting humans and domestic animals that constitutes a serious public health problem in many countries. Although many antigens have been examined so far as protein- or DNA-based vaccines, none of them conferred complete long-term protection. The use of the lizard non-pathogenic to humans <i>Leishmania (L.) tarentolae</i> species as a live vaccine vector to deliver specific <i>Leishmania</i> antigens is a recent approach that needs to be explored further. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of live vaccination in protecting BALB/c mice against <i>L. infantum</i> infection using prime-boost regimens, namely Live/Live and DNA/Live. As a live vaccine, we used recombinant <i>L. tarentolae</i> expressing the <i>L. donovani</i> A2 antigen along with cysteine proteinases (CPA and CPB without its unusual C-terminal extension (CPB<sup>-CTE</sup>)) as a tri-fusion gene. For DNA priming, the tri-fusion gene was encoded in pcDNA formulated with cationic solid lipid nanoparticles (cSLN) acting as an adjuvant. At different time points post-challenge, parasite burden and histopathological changes as well as humoral and cellular immune responses were assessed. Our results showed that immunization with both prime-boost A2-CPA-CPB<sup>-CTE</sup>-recombinant <i>L. tarentolae</i> protects BALB/c mice against <i>L. infantum</i> challenge. This protective immunity is associated with a Th1-type immune response due to high levels of IFN-γ production prior and after challenge and with lower levels of IL-10 production after challenge, leading to a significantly higher IFN-γ/IL-10 ratio compared to the control groups. Moreover, this immunization elicited high IgG1 and IgG2a humoral immune responses. Protection in mice was also correlated with a high nitric oxide production and low parasite burden. Altogether, these results indicate the promise of the A2-CPA-CPB<sup>-CTE</sup>-recombinant <i>L. tarentolae</i> as a safe live vaccine candidate against VL.</p> </div

    Expression of the A2-CPA-CPB<sup>-CTE</sup>-EGFP tri-fusion gene by <i>L.tarentolae</i>.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Expression of EGFP by recombinant <i>L. tarentolae</i>-EGFP promastigotes (left) and <i>L. tarentolae</i>-A2-CPA-CPB<sup>-CTE</sup>-EGFP promastigotes (right) before and after glinting of fluorescence. (B) Percentage of the EGFP positive population in <i>L. tarentolae</i> transfected with either pLEXSY-EGFP (left) or pLEXSY-A2-CPA-CPB<sup>-CTE</sup>-EGFP (clone #5, right) as determined by flow cytometry. (C) Western blot analysis for evaluating expression of the A2-CPA-CPB<sup>-CTE</sup>-EGFP fusion protein. A 102.56 kDa band corresponding to the A2-CPA-CPB<sup>-CTE</sup>-EGFP protein was detected in the recombinant <i>L. tar</i>-A2-CPA-CPB<sup>-CTE</sup>-EGFP by western blotting using an anti-CPB antibody. No band was seen in lane 1 representing a negative control (<i>L. tarentolae</i> wild type).</p

    Liver and spleen histological sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E).

    No full text
    <p>(A) Splenic architecture of normal (non-immunized) mice in comparison with groups G1 to G5 as indicated in <a href="http://www.plosntds.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002174#pntd-0002174-g002" target="_blank">Figure 2</a> at 4<sup>th</sup> week post-infection with 10<sup>7 </sup><i>L. infantum</i> stationary promastigotes. Disruption of the splenic architecture accompanied by lymphoid depletion could be seen in control mice infected with 10<sup>7 </sup><i>L. infantum</i> promastigotes after the first month. (B) Presence of parasites in the spleen tissue of non-vaccinated groups at 4<sup>th</sup> week after challenge with 10<sup>7 </sup><i>L. infantum</i>. (C) The liver granuloma reaction at 8 weeks following <i>L. infantum</i> challenge infection in all groups compared to the non-infected mice. (D) Mature granuloma assembly in control group 3, resulting in the attraction of lymphocytes and monocytes at 14<sup>th</sup> week after challenge The number of independent repeats was two and number of mice per group/time point n = 2.</p

    Analysis of the specific humoral response induced in vaccinated and control mice before and after challenge.

    No full text
    <p>Mice were bled after two vaccinations before challenge and 5 weeks after challenge. Sera were obtained from individual mice from each group and pooled (n = 15). G1 to G5 groups are as indicated in <a href="http://www.plosntds.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002174#pntd-0002174-g002" target="_blank">Figure 2</a>. Before challenge sera were tested for anti rA2-rCPA-rCPB (A) and F/T <i>L. tarentolae</i> A2-CPA-CPB<sup>-CTE</sup>-EGFP (B) and after challenge sera were tested for anti F/T <i>L. infantum</i> (C) antibodies by an isotype-specific ELISA. The asterisk indicates the significant difference between values at the indicated time points as determined by Student's test (<i>p</i><0.05 denoted as *, <i>p</i><0.01 denoted as **, <i>p</i><0.001 denoted as *** and n.s. denoted as non significant).</p

    Liver and splenic parasite burden in all groups following immunization and infectious challenge with <i>L. infantum</i>.

    No full text
    <p>The parasite number in the liver (A, B) or spleen (D, E) was evaluated by Limiting Dilution Assay (LDA) at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks post-infection. The parasite burden in the liver was compared between groups G1 and G3, G4 (controls) (A) and between G2 and G3, G5 (controls) (B). Areas contained under the curves (AUC) obtained in A and B were compared between groups G1, G2 and their related controls groups G4 and G5, respectively (C). The parasite burden in spleen was compared between groups G1 and G3, G4 (controls) (D) and between G2 and G3, G5 (controls) (E). Areas contained under the curves (AUC) obtained in D and E were compared between groups G1, G2 and their related controls groups G4, G5, respectively (F). The number of two independent repeats is shown here as mean±S.E. of measures obtained from 4 mice of each group (see <a href="http://www.plosntds.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002174#s2" target="_blank">Materials and methods</a> for more detail about the groups). G1 [vaccinated with DNA A2-CPA-CPB<sup>-CTE</sup>-cSLN (prime) and Live <i>L. tarentolae</i>-A2-CPA-CPB<sup>-CTE</sup> (boost)]; G2 [vaccinated with Live <i>L. tarentolae</i>-A2-CPA-CPB<sup>-CTE</sup> (prime) and Live <i>L. tarentolae</i>-A2-CPA-CPB<sup>-CTE</sup> (boost)]; G3 (control PBS); G4 [(DNA vector alone (prime) and Live <i>L. tarentolae</i> wild type (boost)], and G5 [Live <i>L. tarentolae</i> wild type (prime) and Live <i>L. tarentolae</i> wild type (boost)]. Only significant differences are shown in the graphs. The asterisk sign (*) indicates the significant difference between G1 and G2 with their respective controls G4 and G5, respectively and the plus sign (+) indicates the significant difference between G1 and G2 with G3 control at the indicated time points as determined by Student's test (<i>p</i><0.05 denoted as *, <i>p</i><0.01 denoted as **and <i>p</i><0.001 denoted as ***).</p
    corecore