Rankings from all three algorithms and resulting consensus.

<p>Rankings from all three algorithms and resulting consensus.</p

NormFinder analysis and established rankings.

<p>NormFinder analysis and established rankings.</p

Pairwise variation (V) analysis of candidate reference genes.

<p>A pairwise variation suggest that the added gene would improve normalization and should preferably be included in normalization. The proposed cut-off value is 0.15.</p

Box and whisker plot of candidate genes.

<p>Shown are the genes’ performance in individual developmental stages as well as overall performance. The ends of the box represents upper and lower quartiles; median is marked by the horizontal line inside the box.</p

Specifications and amplification characteristics of candidate genes.

<p>Specifications and amplification characteristics of candidate genes.</p

Average stability values (M) of genes in individual developmental stages and cell culture.

<p>Lower values indicate better stability.</p

Rankings of candidate genes by geNorm.

<p>Rankings of candidate genes by geNorm.</p