6 research outputs found

    Deep Learning Approach for Building Detection Using LiDAR-Orthophoto Fusion

    Full text link
    © 2018 Faten Hamed Nahhas et al. This paper reports on a building detection approach based on deep learning (DL) using the fusion of Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data and orthophotos. The proposed method utilized object-based analysis to create objects, a feature-level fusion, an autoencoder-based dimensionality reduction to transform low-level features into compressed features, and a convolutional neural network (CNN) to transform compressed features into high-level features, which were used to classify objects into buildings and background. The proposed architecture was optimized for the grid search method, and its sensitivity to hyperparameters was analyzed and discussed. The proposed model was evaluated on two datasets selected from an urban area with different building types. Results show that the dimensionality reduction by the autoencoder approach from 21 features to 10 features can improve detection accuracy from 86.06% to 86.19% in the working area and from 77.92% to 78.26% in the testing area. The sensitivity analysis also shows that the selection of the hyperparameter values of the model significantly affects detection accuracy. The best hyperparameters of the model are 128 filters in the CNN model, the Adamax optimizer, 10 units in the fully connected layer of the CNN model, a batch size of 8, and a dropout of 0.2. These hyperparameters are critical to improving the generalization capacity of the model. Furthermore, comparison experiments with the support vector machine (SVM) show that the proposed model with or without dimensionality reduction outperforms the SVM models in the working area. However, the SVM model achieves better accuracy in the testing area than the proposed model without dimensionality reduction. This study generally shows that the use of an autoencoder in DL models can improve the accuracy of building recognition in fused LiDAR-orthophoto data

    A refined classification approach by integrating Landsat Operational Land Imager (OLI) and RADARSAT-2 imagery for land-use and land-cover mapping in a tropical area

    Full text link
    Producing accurate land-use and land-cover (LULC) mapping is a long-standing challenge using solely optical remote-sensing data, especially in tropical regions due to the presence of clouds. To supplement this, RADARSAT images can be useful in assisting LULC mapping. The fusion of optical and active remote-sensing data is important for accurate LULC mapping because the data from different parts of the spectrum provide complementary information and often lead to increased classification accuracy. Also, the timeliness of using synthetic aperture radar (SAR) fills information gaps during overcast or hazy periods. Therefore, this research designed a refined classification procedure for LULC mapping for tropical regions. Determining the best method for mapping with a specific data source and study area is a major challenge because of the wide range of classification algorithms and methodologies available. In this study, different combinations and the potential of Landsat Operational Land Imager (OLI) and RADARSAT-2 SAR data were evaluated to select the best procedure for LULC classification. Results showed that the best filter for SAR speckle reduction is the 5 × 5 enhanced Lee. Furthermore, image-sharpening algorithms were employed to fuse Landsat multispectral and panchromatic bands and subsequently these algorithms were analysed in detail. The findings also confirmed that Gram–Schmidt (GS) performed better than the other techniques employed. Fused Landsat data and SAR images were then integrated to produce the LULC map. Different classification algorithms were adopted to classify the integrated Landsat and SAR data, and the maximum likelihood classifier (MLC) was considered the best approach. Finally, a suitable classification procedure was designed and proposed for LULC as mapping in tropical regions based on the results obtained. An overall accuracy of 98.62% was achieved from the proposed methodology. The proposed methodology is a useful tool in industry for mapping purposes. Additionally, it is also useful for researchers, who could extend the method for different data sources and regions

    Positron emission tomography imaging of prostate cancer

    No full text

    Thrombin-receptor antagonist vorapaxar in acute coronary syndromes

    No full text
    BACKGROUND Vorapaxar is a new oral protease-activated–receptor 1 (PAR-1) antagonist that inhibits thrombin-induced platelet activation. METHODS In this multinational, double-blind, randomized trial, we compared vorapaxar with placebo in 12,944 patients who had acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. The primary end point was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, stroke, recurrent ischemia with rehospitalization, or urgent coronary revascularization. RESULTS Follow-up in the trial was terminated early after a safety review. After a median follow-up of 502 days (interquartile range, 349 to 667), the primary end point occurred in 1031 of 6473 patients receiving vorapaxar versus 1102 of 6471 patients receiving placebo (Kaplan–Meier 2-year rate, 18.5% vs. 19.9%; hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 to 1.01; P = 0.07). A composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke occurred in 822 patients in the vorapaxar group versus 910 in the placebo group (14.7% and 16.4%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81 to 0.98; P = 0.02). Rates of moderate and severe bleeding were 7.2% in the vorapaxar group and 5.2% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.58; P<0.001). Intracranial hemorrhage rates were 1.1% and 0.2%, respectively (hazard ratio, 3.39; 95% CI, 1.78 to 6.45; P<0.001). Rates of nonhemorrhagic adverse events were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS In patients with acute coronary syndromes, the addition of vorapaxar to standard therapy did not significantly reduce the primary composite end point but significantly increased the risk of major bleeding, including intracranial hemorrhage
    corecore