Using a Collaborative, Virtual Discussion Platform to Mobilize Oncologic Expertise for the COVID-19 Pandemic.

PurposeCOVID-19 is a rapidly emerging worldwide pandemic that has drastically changed health care across the United States. Oncology patients are especially vulnerable. Novel point-of-care resources may be useful to rapidly disseminate peer-reviewed information from oncology experts nationwide. We describe our initial experience with distributing this information through a private, curated, virtual collaboration question-and-answer (Q&A) platform for oncologists.MethodsThe Q&A database was queried for a 2-month period from March 12 to May 12, 2020. We collected the total number of views and unique viewers for the questions. We classified the questions according to their emphasis (practice management, clinical management, both) and disease type across radiation oncology, medical oncology, gynecologic oncology, and pediatric oncology.ResultsSeventy-nine questions were approved, 67 of which were answered and generated 49,494 views with 5,148 unique viewers. Most discussions covered clinical management, with breast cancer being the most active disease site. Ten questions covered pediatric oncology and gynecologic oncology. Forty-seven percent of the 11,010 users of the platform visited the website during the 2-month period.ConclusionDiscussions on the Q&A platform reached a substantial number of oncologists throughout the nation and may help oncologists to modify their treatment in real time with the rapidly evolving COVID-19 pandemic

Malignant Breast Cancer in Children: A Review of 75 Patients

To determine incidence trends and outcomes for pediatric patients with malignant breast disease. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry was examined for all females 19 years of age and younger diagnosed with a malignant breast tumor between 1973 and 2004. A total of 75 patients with malignant breast tumors were identified. Overall, 14.5% of patients had in situ tumors, and 85.5% had invasive disease. Tumors were classified as being either carcinomas ( n = 41, 54.7%) or sarcomas ( n = 34, 45.3%). The majority of sarcomatous lesions were phyllodes tumors ( n = 29, 85.5%), whereas most carcinomas were of a ductal etiology ( n = 19, 46.3%). The age-adjusted incidence of all malignant pediatric breast tumors in 2003 was 0.08 cases per 100,000 people (0.03 carcinoma and 0.06 sarcoma cases per 100,000 people). In the carcinoma group, regionally advanced disease was present in 11 patients (26.8%), whereas only 3 patients (7.3%) presented with metastatic disease. All patients with sarcomatous tumors presented with localized disease. Adjuvant radiation therapy was administered in only 9.8% of carcinomas and 8.8% of sarcomas, and 85.4% of carcinoma patients and 97.1% of sarcoma patients underwent surgical resection for their primary disease. Subgroup analysis revealed 5- and 10-year survival rates of 89.6% for patients with sarcomatous tumors and 63.1% and 54.3% for carcinomas. Malignant pediatric breast malignancies remain relatively rare. The two most common histologies of breast neoplasms in children are malignant carcinomas followed by sarcomas. Although uncommon, malignant disease must be considered in the differential diagnosis of the pediatric patient with a breast mass

Surgery does not adversely affect survival in primary gastrointestinal lymphoma

To evaluate the impact of surgery on gastrointestinal lymphoma. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was queried from 1973 to 2005. A total of 17,222 cases of PGIL were identified. The overall incidence of PGIL was approximately 1.505 cases per 100,000. A significantly increasing incidence for PGIL was observed (APC = +4.67, P < 0.05). In the cases for which treatment data was available, resection occurred in roughly half of the patients. In univariate analysis, surgical extirpation did not improve survival (47 months vs. 76 months, P < 0.001), while radiation treatment improved median survival (77 months vs. 59 months, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed increasing age and male gender as independent predictors of decreased overall survival. Tumor location also was a significant predictor of outcome. Large B-cell lymphoma type PGIL had a poorer prognosis than marginal zone B-cell lymphoma. By multivariate analysis, surgery was not found to increase the risk of death (HR = 0.99). No associated survival benefit for surgery in the treatment in gastrointestinal lymphoma was observed. Determination of lymphoma should preclude surgical resection. Nonetheless, inadvertent extirpative surgery or in association with perforation does not appear to increase mortality

Racial Disparities in Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Breast Cancer Clinical Trials

© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. There is a paucity of data regarding factors affecting enrollment onto radiation oncology clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to determine patients and tumor characteristics that influenced enrollment of breast cancer patients onto hypofractionated breast radiotherapy trials (HBRTs) at a single institution. In this retrospective cohort study, patients enrolled on HBRTs at the Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey (n = 132) were compared with a cohort of breast cancer patients eligible for, but not enrolled onto HBRTs treated during the same time period (n = 132). Charts were retrospectively reviewed to determine patients\u27 demographics, clinico-pathologic factors, and treatment characteristics. Statistical analysis was performed to analyze variables affecting enrollment onto HBRTs between the two groups. Over a 42-month time period, 132 patients treated on HBRTs received 2,475-4,995 cGy over 3 to 15 fractions. When compared with patients treated off trial, there was no statistically significant effect of age, family history, lymph node positivity, tumor grade, estrogen or Her-2 receptor status, use of chemotherapy or hormones, use of brachytherapy, or the site of initial consultation on HBRT enrollment. Non-White women were less likely to enroll in HBRT\u27s when compared with White women (25.7% versus 40.1%, p = 0.0129), though this was found to be a nonsignificant trend when taking stage into consideration on multivariate analysis (OR for lower T-stage: 0.281, p = 0.003, OR 1.839 for white race, p = 0.076). Consistent with previous studies, non-White women were less likely to enroll in HBRTs than White women. However, disease stage accounted for these racial disparities. Further studies must be performed to determine if race is an independent factor determining radiation oncology clinical trial enrollment