An Automated Machine Learning-based Model Predicts Postoperative Mortality Using Readily-Extractable Preoperative Electronic Health Record Data

Background Rapid, preoperative identification of patients with the highest risk for medical complications is necessary to ensure that limited infrastructure and human resources are directed towards those most likely to benefit. Existing risk scores either lack specificity at the patient level or utilise the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification, which requires a clinician to review the chart. Methods We report on the use of machine learning algorithms, specifically random forests, to create a fully automated score that predicts postoperative in-hospital mortality based solely on structured data available at the time of surgery. Electronic health record data from 53 097 surgical patients (2.01% mortality rate) who underwent general anaesthesia between April 1, 2013 and December 10, 2018 in a large US academic medical centre were used to extract 58 preoperative features. Results Using a random forest classifier we found that automatically obtained preoperative features (area under the curve [AUC] of 0.932, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.910–0.951) outperforms Preoperative Score to Predict Postoperative Mortality (POSPOM) scores (AUC of 0.660, 95% CI 0.598–0.722), Charlson comorbidity scores (AUC of 0.742, 95% CI 0.658–0.812), and ASA physical status (AUC of 0.866, 95% CI 0.829–0.897). Including the ASA physical status with the preoperative features achieves an AUC of 0.936 (95% CI 0.917–0.955). Conclusions This automated score outperforms the ASA physical status score, the Charlson comorbidity score, and the POSPOM score for predicting in-hospital mortality. Additionally, we integrate this score with a previously published postoperative score to demonstrate the extent to which patient risk changes during the perioperative period

Computational Methods to Inform Healthcare Decisions at Individual and Population Levels

At a time when computational power and big data are driving revolutionary changes across various sectors, the healthcare industry is on the verge of a significant transformation. The integration of sophisticated computational techniques promises not only to enhance medical decision-making but also to fundamentally change the delivery of healthcare services. However, the sector grapples with challenges like the underutilization of its abundant data in clinical guidelines, which tend to rely on oversimplified, population-based methods, and the scarcity of annotated and labeled datasets in medical contexts. In this dissertation, we address the challenges impeding the full exploitation of computational capabilities in healthcare. The initial chapters are dedicated to enhancing decision-making at an individual level. Specifically, Chapter One addresses the classification challenges in 3D medical imaging, a task hindered by sparse and labor-intensive annotation processes. Chapter Two introduces a novel approach that leverages transformer models to augment and personalize clinical practice guidelines, thereby enhancing their relevance and applicability to individual patient care. Subsequent chapters pivot to a population-level perspective, presenting computational techniques that analyze varied datasets, ranging from social media data to records of the COVID-19 pandemic. These methods attempt to identify causal mechanisms and quantify uncertainty to support decision-making that is both data-driven and reliable

The heterogeneous effects of social support on the adoption of Facebook’s vaccine profile frames feature

Abstract Achieving widespread COVID-19 vaccine acceptance is a key step to global recovery from the pandemic, but hesitancy towards vaccination remains a major challenge. Social proof, where a person’s attitude towards vaccination is influenced by their belief in the attitudes of their social network, has been shown to be effective for making in-roads upon hesitancy. However, it is not easy to know the attitudes of one’s network, nor reliably signal one’s own feelings towards COVID-19 vaccines, minimizing the impact of the social influence channel. To address this issue, Facebook launched a feature that enables users to overlay a message indicating that they support vaccination upon their profile picture. To raise awareness of these vaccine profile frames (VPFs), users received a variety of promotional messages from Facebook, a subset of which contained the social context of friends who had already adopted the frame. Leveraging this variation in promotional messaging, we analyzed the adoption pattern of VPFs in the US to determine the most effective strategies to drive VPF usage. We found that adoption is driven by a pattern of complex diffusion, where multiple exposures to the adoption decisions of others increased VPF uptake, and that there is substantial heterogeneity in the adoption response associated with prior vaccine beliefs, whether the promotion had a social component and closeness of the tie included in social promotions. Specifically, we observed resistance to adoption correlated with an aversion to follow authoritative health pages and stronger adoption effects from social promotions containing close friends. We also confirmed this finding of the value of strong ties through a randomized field experiment and heterogeneous treatment effects modeling. In contrast to studies that have shown the importance of less close relationships in vaccine decision-making, we found little effect from awareness of VPF adoption by weak ties. Finally, we detected no significant backfire effect for expressing support for COVID-19 vaccines via VPFs. Together, these results suggest that social proof provided by close friends may be a key driver for messaging campaigns intended to drive prosocial behavior such as publicly promoting vaccination and that these campaigns do not necessarily come with adverse experiences for adopters, even for a polarizing issue such as vaccines

Automated large-scale prediction of exudative AMD progression using machine-read OCT biomarkers.

Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) is a major cause of irreversible vision loss in individuals over 55 years old in the United States. One of the late-stage manifestations of AMD, and a major cause of vision loss, is the development of exudative macular neovascularization (MNV). Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) is the gold standard to identify fluid at different levels within the retina. The presence of fluid is considered the hallmark to define the presence of disease activity. Anti-vascular growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections can be used to treat exudative MNV. However, given the limitations of anti-VEGF treatment, as burdensome need for frequent visits and repeated injections to sustain efficacy, limited durability of the treatment, poor or no response, there is a great interest in detecting early biomarkers associated with a higher risk for AMD progression to exudative forms in order to optimize the design of early intervention clinical trials. The annotation of structural biomarkers on optical coherence tomography (OCT) B-scans is a laborious, complex and time-consuming process, and discrepancies between human graders can introduce variability into this assessment. To address this issue, a deep-learning model (SLIVER-net) was proposed, which could identify AMD biomarkers on structural OCT volumes with high precision and without human supervision. However, the validation was performed on a small dataset, and the true predictive power of these detected biomarkers in the context of a large cohort has not been evaluated. In this retrospective cohort study, we perform the largest-scale validation of these biomarkers to date. We also assess how these features combined with other EHR data (demographics, comorbidities, etc) affect and/or improve the prediction performance relative to known factors. Our hypothesis is that these biomarkers can be identified by a machine learning algorithm without human supervision, in a way that they preserve their predictive nature. The way we test this hypothesis is by building several machine learning models utilizing these machine-read biomarkers and assessing their added predictive power. We found that not only can we show that the machine-read OCT B-scan biomarkers are predictive of AMD progression, we also observe that our proposed combined OCT and EHR data-based algorithm outperforms the state-of-the-art solution in clinically relevant metrics and provides actionable information which has the potential to improve patient care. In addition, it provides a framework for automated large-scale processing of OCT volumes, making it possible to analyze vast archives without human supervision

Imputation of the continuous arterial line blood pressure waveform from non-invasive measurements using deep learning.

In two-thirds of intensive care unit (ICU) patients and 90% of surgical patients, arterial blood pressure (ABP) is monitored non-invasively but intermittently using a blood pressure cuff. Since even a few minutes of hypotension increases the risk of mortality and morbidity, for the remaining (high-risk) patients ABP is measured continuously using invasive devices, and derived values are extracted from the recorded waveforms. However, since invasive monitoring is associated with major complications (infection, bleeding, thrombosis), the ideal ABP monitor should be both non-invasive and continuous. With large volumes of high-fidelity physiological waveforms, it may be possible today to impute a physiological waveform from other available signals. Currently, the state-of-the-art approaches for ABP imputation only aim at intermittent systolic and diastolic blood pressure imputation, and there is no method that imputes the continuous ABP waveform. Here, we developed a novel approach to impute the continuous ABP waveform non-invasively using two continuously-monitored waveforms that are currently part of the standard-of-care, the electrocardiogram (ECG) and photo-plethysmogram (PPG), by adapting a deep learning architecture designed for image segmentation. Using over 150,000 min of data collected at two separate health systems from 463 patients, we demonstrate that our model provides a highly accurate prediction of the continuous ABP waveform (root mean square error 5.823 (95% CI 5.806-5.840) mmHg), as well as the derived systolic (mean difference 2.398 ± 5.623 mmHg) and diastolic blood pressure (mean difference - 2.497 ± 3.785 mmHg) compared to arterial line measurements. Our approach can potentially be used to measure blood pressure continuously and non-invasively for all patients in the acute care setting, without the need for any additional instrumentation beyond the current standard-of-care

Methylation risk scores are associated with a collection of phenotypes within electronic health record systems.

Inference of clinical phenotypes is a fundamental task in precision medicine, and has therefore been heavily investigated in recent years in the context of electronic health records (EHR) using a large arsenal of machine learning techniques, as well as in the context of genetics using polygenic risk scores (PRS). In this work, we considered the epigenetic analog of PRS, methylation risk scores (MRS), a linear combination of methylation states. We measured methylation across a large cohort (n = 831) of diverse samples in the UCLA Health biobank, for which both genetic and complete EHR data are available. We constructed MRS for 607 phenotypes spanning diagnoses, clinical lab tests, and medication prescriptions. When added to a baseline set of predictive features, MRS significantly improved the imputation of 139 outcomes, whereas the PRS improved only 22 (median improvement for methylation 10.74%, 141.52%, and 15.46% in medications, labs, and diagnosis codes, respectively, whereas genotypes only improved the labs at a median increase of 18.42%). We added significant MRS to state-of-the-art EHR imputation methods that leverage the entire set of medical records, and found that including MRS as a medical feature in the algorithm significantly improves EHR imputation in 37% of lab tests examined (median R2 increase 47.6%). Finally, we replicated several MRS in multiple external studies of methylation (minimum p-value of 2.72 × 10-7) and replicated 22 of 30 tested MRS internally in two separate cohorts of different ethnicity. Our publicly available results and weights show promise for methylation risk scores as clinical and scientific tools

An automated machine learning-based model predicts postoperative mortality using readily-extractable preoperative electronic health record data

Background: Rapid, preoperative identification of patients with the highest risk for medical complications is necessary to ensure that limited infrastructure and human resources are directed towards those most likely to benefit. Existing risk scores either lack specificity at the patient level or utilise the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification, which requires a clinician to review the chart. Methods: We report on the use of machine learning algorithms, specifically random forests, to create a fully automated score that predicts postoperative in-hospital mortality based solely on structured data available at the time of surgery. Electronic health record data from 53 097 surgical patients (2.01% mortality rate) who underwent general anaesthesia between April 1, 2013 and December 10, 2018 in a large US academic medical centre were used to extract 58 preoperative features. Results: Using a random forest classifier we found that automatically obtained preoperative features (area under the curve [AUC] of 0.932, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.910–0.951) outperforms Preoperative Score to Predict Postoperative Mortality (POSPOM) scores (AUC of 0.660, 95% CI 0.598–0.722), Charlson comorbidity scores (AUC of 0.742, 95% CI 0.658–0.812), and ASA physical status (AUC of 0.866, 95% CI 0.829–0.897). Including the ASA physical status with the preoperative features achieves an AUC of 0.936 (95% CI 0.917–0.955). Conclusions: This automated score outperforms the ASA physical status score, the Charlson comorbidity score, and the POSPOM score for predicting in-hospital mortality. Additionally, we integrate this score with a previously published postoperative score to demonstrate the extent to which patient risk changes during the perioperative period