L’influence de l’enracinement du savoir sur l’évolution d’un cluster. Étude de la trajectoire historique de l’industrie des parfums de Grasse

Dans cet article nous explorons les changements du cluster français de l’industrie des parfums afin de montrer comment la théorie de la trajectoire du cluster pourrait être enrichie par l’analyse de ce cas spécifique. En mobilisant les concepts fondamentaux de la théorie de Mahoney et de l’approche économique fondée sur les connaissances, nous avançons une étude de cas avec pour objectif l’analyse de l’évolution longitudinale de ce cluster régional. En particulier, nous soutenons que le savoir enraciné et l’innovation influencent la trajectoire suivie lors de la longue histoire de ce cluster. Notre recherche nous amène aussi à identifier certaines conduites managériales permettant de soutenir des savoirs enracinés.This article investigates the evolutions undergone by France’s perfume industry cluster. Starting from the fundamental concepts of Mahoney’s theory and from a knowledge-based view of business, we used a case study to analyse this regional cluster’s longitudinal evolution. Embedded knowledge and innovation have had a major influence on this cluster’s trajectory throughout the irregular course of its long history. The article also identifies the types of managerial behaviours that are efficient in supporting embedded knowledge

Le rôle de la proximité dans l’apprentissage interactif au sein des districts industriels : étude de cas du district de Murano

International audienc

How proximity matters in interactive learning and innovation: a study of the Venetian glass industry

International audienc

The ability-willingness paradox of small family firms to collaborate for innovation

Family firms’ innovation collaboration activities are characterized by the so-called ability-willingness paradox, i.e. they are less willing to engage in collaborations, but more able to benefit from it. In this paper, we introduce collaboration partner type and geographic proximity as two important boundary conditions of this paradox. We examine the differences in knowledge collaboration for innovation across different geographical proximities and partner types for a small family and non-family firms. We use a large sample of 6,272 small firms in the United Kingdom (UK) during 2002-2016 to show that this paradox is indeed not a universal phenomenon. Small family firms overcome their lower willingness when collaborating with customers within regional proximity and are able to generate an innovation output premium as compared to small non-family firms

How does family capital influence the resilience of family firms?

International audienc

Innovation in family firms: the Brittelstand

The Brittelstand are innovative, family-owned firms that offer national and international opportunities in the United Kingdom (UK). These fast-growing businesses are customer-oriented and proud of their family ownership and embeddedness within communities. While Brittelstand firms are as likely to deploy open innovation models as non-Brittelstand firms, their engagement with customers in regional and national markets and the ability to benefit from this collaboration contrasts with their willingness to engage in open innovation. Using longitudinal data and regression analysis on 13876 firms with 24286 observations over 2004-2020, we develop and test a theoretical framework of open innovation in the Brittelstand. Our model explains the willingness and ability of the Brittelstand firms to engage in open innovation and benefit from it. Our results show that Brittelstand firms are less willing than non-Brittelstand firms to collaborate with customers and universities, contrasting prior research on family firms, and distinguishing the innovation model of the Brittelstand from a family business model. The Brittelstand firms who are able to engage in collaboration with customers in domestic markets will outperform their non-Brittelstand counterparts in innovation outputs. In line with other studies, this study is associated with several limitations that open opportunities for further research that replicate and/or extends this study. First, this study is unbalanced panel data and the fact that some firms appear in the model only once from 2004-2020. The longitudinal study will allow to enforce causality of the relationship and examine the dynamics of open innovation in the Brittelstand. Second, the indicator on the extent and mechanisms of collaboration with customers could be better explained and measured, for example, using a scale indicator instead of a binary variable for knowledge collaboration across different types of partners and four geographical dimensions. First, Brittelstand firms who are less likely to employ open innovation models nationally and with customers. However, those Brittelstand firms who decide to collaborate with customers nationally are more likely to increase their innovation sales compared to those firms that do not engage in such collaborations? This is an interesting and unexpected finding, which means that low willingness of cross-country and cross-regional collaboration for Brittelstand firms is not optimal and engagement in collaboration with customers in domestic markets is beneficial for innovation. Managers and policymakers may use this finding to design and re-design their open innovation strategies with customers within and across regions in the UK. Second, managers may benefit from the integrated view on the two drivers of firm innovation - a collaboration with customers and the local embeddedness of such collaboration. This study describes the phenomenon of the Brittelstand and investigates the link between open knowledge sourcing across different geographical proximities and partners and innovation outputs. Firstly, we contribute to open innovation and RBV literature in family firms by theorizing and empirically testing the open innovation model for the Brittelstand firms. We also debate that the Brittelstand firms should overcome this inertia of willingness to collaborate across heterogeneous external partners and convert their regional/national embeddedness with customers into strengths for greater product innovation. Secondly, we contribute to family business literature by explaining how and why the Brittelstand firms can achieve greater innovation outputs. In doing so we draw on the concept of familiness and local embeddedness

Mettre en œuvre des dispositifs managériaux en vue de valoriser le savoir : Application au cas d’un systémier de l’aéronautique

International audienc