Fourier transform spectroscopy of carbonyl sulfide from 4800 to 8000 cm–1 and new global analysis of 16O12C32S

We have measured the FT spectrum of natural OCS from 4800 to 8000 cm-1 with a near Doppler resolution and a line-position accuracy between 2 and 8 × 10-4 cm-1. For the normal isotopic species 16O12C32S, 37 vibrational transitions have been analyzed for both frequencies and intensities. We also report six bands of 16O13C34S, five bands of 16O13C32S, two bands of 16O12C33S, and two bands of 18O12C32S. Important effective Herman-Wallis terms are explained by the anharmonic resonances between closely spaced states. As those results complete the study of the Fourier transform spectra of natural carbonyl sulfide from 1800 to 8000 cm-1, a new global rovibrational analysis of 16O12C32S has been performed. We have determined a set of 148 molecular parameters, and a statistical agreement is obtained with all the available experimental data. © 1998 Academic Press.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Disruption of biofilms from sewage pipes under physical and chemical conditioning.

International audienc

Relative clauses and genitive constructions in Semitic

This volume is the outcome of two workshops held at the University of Salford, April 18th 2007 and April 7th and 8th 2008. The first of these, Relative clauses and attribution in Semitic, coincided with Jan Retsö’s tenure as University Campus Visiting Research Fellow at the University of Salford February–April 2007. During this period, Jan pursued research on typological and diachronic aspects of relative clause marking in the Semitic languages. From discussions held at this time, it became increasingly clear that it would be fruitful to compare relative clause marking with two other noun phrase syntagms – genitive construction and adjectival attribution. Within the Semitic domain, these three syntagms exhibit both common and divergent syntactic, morphological and semantic properties. This raises interesting questions about typology and diachrony, on the one hand, and how to account for these syntagms within various linguistic models, on the other. In order to stimulate new thinking on these research questions, we decided to invite several internationally renowned scholars on extant and extinct Semitic languages to a one-day workshop at the University of Salford. At this first workshop, eight speakers addressed issues relating to relative clauses and adjectival attribution in eight languages and dialect groups, viz. Neo-Aramaic, Standard Arabic, the modern Arabic dialects of Sudan and south-western Saudi Arabia, Akkadian, Geez, Biblical Hebrew, Sabaean and Syriac. In discussions following this workshop, it was agreed that a second workshop be held on comparative and diachronic aspects of genitive constructions in Semitic; it was proposed that this workshop, entitled Genitive constructions in Semitic: Comparative and diachronic perspectives, be held over two days and be extended to include twelve speakers in order to cover a greater range of the modern Semitic languages, particularly Ethio-Semitic, Modern Hebrew and Modern South Arabian. The papers in this volume represent different descriptive and theoretical ways of linguistic thinking – generativist (Fassi-Fehri, Glinert, Yri), typology and diachrony (Eksell, Ouhalla, Retsö), and data-oriented descriptive analyses with different theoretical presuppositions (Arnold, Dickins, Edzard, Khan, Kuty, Naïm, Watson). The relative dominance of the descriptivist approach reflects both a solid tradition in Semitic studies, which has been strongly data-oriented, and the necessity of pres-enting a rich store of data in order to prepare the ground for sound linguistic analysis. The papers have been arranged according to the geographical distribution of the Semitic languages examined. The volume begins with three papers having a general and comparative Semitic perspective; these are followed by papers dealing with North Semitic (Western and Eastern Neo-Aramaic, Classical Aramaic and Modern Hebrew), then Arabic (Standard Arabic, various extant and extinct Arabic dialects), and finally South Semitic (Amharic and Mehri).This is not the end of the story. In discussions during the workshops which gave rise to these papers, it became clear that there is a need to further investigate the third noun phrase category, adjectival attribution, and in the case of all three noun phrase categories to examine the role of definiteness and the animacy hierarchy, notions raised in some of the papers in this volume. Further research will examine the various ways in which these noun phrase categories interact with one another.Jan RetsöJanet C.E. Watso