Evaluation of Effectiveness of Diethylcarbamazine/Albendazole Combination in Reduction of Wuchereria Bancrofti Infection using Multiple Infection Parameters

Article JournalTo evaluate the effect of multiple rounds of annual single dose of DEC (6 mg/kg) or albendazole (400 mg) given alone or in combination on Wuchereria bancrofti microfilaraemia, anti-filarial IgG1 and IgG4 and antigenaemia. A total of 170 participants were randomly assigned to albendazole (n = 62), DEC (n = 54), and DEC plus albendazole (DEC/ALB) combination (n = 54). Blood samples were collected at pre-treatment in 1998, at 1 week and 6 months after the first treatment and thereafter before subsequent treatments in 1999 and 2000. Effects of treatment on W. bancrofti infection were determined by changes in levels of microfilaraemia, antifilarial antibodies and circulating filarial antigen. Comparison of geometric mean microfilariae intensities between DEC/ALB combination and DEC or albendazole single therapy groups after two rounds of annual treatment and 24 months follow-up showed that combination therapy resulted in a greater reduction of microfilaraemia than single therapy with either albendazole (p < 0.001) or DEC alone (p = 0.146). The overall levels of anti-filarial antibodies decreased significantly (p = 0.028 for IgG1 and p < 0.043 for IgG4) in all treatment groups at 24 months follow-up. Additionally, overall reduction in geometric mean circulating filarial antigen levels at 24 months was 44%, 60% and 85% for albendazole, DEC and DEC/ALB groups, respectively.These study findings suggest that albendazole improved efficacy of DEC and mass administration of a combination of the two drugs would therefore enhance the interruption of transmission of W. bancrofti in endemic areas. This information has important implications for the ongoing Global Program for Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis

The ASOS Surgical Risk Calculator: development and validation of a tool for identifying African surgical patients at risk of severe postoperative complications

Background: The African Surgical Outcomes Study (ASOS) showed that surgical patients in Africa have a mortality twice the global average. Existing risk assessment tools are not valid for use in this population because the pattern of risk for poor outcomes differs from high-income countries. The objective of this study was to derive and validate a simple, preoperative risk stratification tool to identify African surgical patients at risk for in-hospital postoperative mortality and severe complications. Methods: ASOS was a 7-day prospective cohort study of adult patients undergoing surgery in Africa. The ASOS Surgical Risk Calculator was constructed with a multivariable logistic regression model for the outcome of in-hospital mortality and severe postoperative complications. The following preoperative risk factors were entered into the model; age, sex, smoking status, ASA physical status, preoperative chronic comorbid conditions, indication for surgery, urgency, severity, and type of surgery. Results: The model was derived from 8799 patients from 168 African hospitals. The composite outcome of severe postoperative complications and death occurred in 423/8799 (4.8%) patients. The ASOS Surgical Risk Calculator includes the following risk factors: age, ASA physical status, indication for surgery, urgency, severity, and type of surgery. The model showed good discrimination with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.805 and good calibration with c-statistic corrected for optimism of 0.784. Conclusions: This simple preoperative risk calculator could be used to identify high-risk surgical patients in African hospitals and facilitate increased postoperative surveillance. © 2018 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Medical Research Council of South Africa gran