22 research outputs found
From Display to Labelled Proofs for Tense Logics
We introduce an effective translation from proofs in the display calculus to proofs in the labelled calculus in the context of tense logics. We identify the labelled calculus proofs in the image of this translation as those built from labelled sequents whose underlying directed graph possesses certain properties. For the basic normal tense logic Kt, the image is shown to be the set of all proofs in the labelled calculus G3Kt
The Class of All Natural Implicative Expansions of Kleene’s Strong Logic Functionally Equivalent to Łukasiewicz’s 3-Valued Logic Ł3
25 p.We consider the logics determined by the set of all natural implicative expansions of Kleene’s strong 3-valued matrix (with both only one and two designated values) and select the class of all logics functionally equivalent to Łukasiewicz’s 3-valued logic Ł3. The concept of a “natural implicative matrix” is based upon the notion of a “natural conditional” defined in Tomova (Rep Math Log 47:173–182, 2012).S
On Deriving Nested Calculi for Intuitionistic Logics from Semantic Systems
This paper shows how to derive nested calculi from labelled calculi for propositional intuitionistic logic and first-order intuitionistic logic with constant domains, thus connecting the general results for labelled calculi with the more refined formalism of nested sequents. The extraction of nested calculi from labelled calculi obtains via considerations pertaining to the elimination of structural rules in labelled derivations. Each aspect of the extraction process is motivated and detailed, showing that each nested calculus inherits favorable proof-theoretic properties from its associated labelled calculus
Multiple Conclusion Rules in Logics with the Disjunction Property
We prove that for the intermediate logics with the disjunction property any
basis of admissible rules can be reduced to a basis of admissible m-rules
(multiple-conclusion rules), and every basis of admissible m-rules can be
reduced to a basis of admissible rules. These results can be generalized to a
broad class of logics including positive logic and its extensions, Johansson
logic, normal extensions of S4, n-transitive logics and intuitionistic modal
logics
Syntactic Cut-Elimination for Intuitionistic Fuzzy Logic via Linear Nested Sequents
This paper employs the linear nested sequent framework to design a new
cut-free calculus LNIF for intuitionistic fuzzy logic--the first-order G\"odel
logic characterized by linear relational frames with constant domains. Linear
nested sequents--which are nested sequents restricted to linear
structures--prove to be a well-suited proof-theoretic formalism for
intuitionistic fuzzy logic. We show that the calculus LNIF possesses highly
desirable proof-theoretic properties such as invertibility of all rules,
admissibility of structural rules, and syntactic cut-elimination.Comment: Appended version of the paper "Syntactic Cut-Elimination for
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Logic via Linear Nested Sequents", accepted to the
International Symposium on Logical Foundations of Computer Science (LFCS
2020
On Combinatorial Proofs for Logics of Relevance and Entailment
International audienceHughes' combinatorial proofs give canonical representations for classical logic proofs. In this paper we characterize classical combi-natorial proofs which also represent valid proofs for relevant logic with and without the mingle axiom. Moreover, we extend our syntax in order to represent combinatorial proofs for the more restrictive framework of entailment logic