Difficult removal of totally implantable venous access devices in adult patients : Incidence, risk factors, and management.

Background:Totally implantable venous access devices (TIVADs) have played an important role of medical oncology practice. However, operators sometimes encounter considerable difficulty when removing TIVADs. This study aimed to investigate the incidence of difficult TIVAD removal, determine associated risk factors, and investigate interventional radiology (IR) approaches to difficult removal.Methods:A total of 514 TIVAD removal procedures performed in a single-center between January 2014 and May 2021 were retrospectively analyzed to determine incidence of difficult removal and associated risk factors. IR approaches applied in difficult removal cases were also reviewed.Results:The incidence of difficult removal was 7.4% (38/514). In univariable analysis, indwelling duration, silicone catheter, and subcutaneous leakage of fluid were identified as significant risk factors for difficult removal. Multivariable analysis showed that indwelling duration per year (odds ratio (OR), 1.46; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.28-1.67; p < 0.01) and subcutaneous leakage of fluid (OR, 6.04; 95% CI, 2.45-14.91; p < 0.01) were significantly associated with difficult removal. In the 38 difficult removal cases, 32 TIVADs could be removed using more dissection and traction than the standard removal method. In the other 6, TIVADs were successfully removed by using several IR techniques, including insertion of a guide wire (n = 1), dissection using an introducer sheath (n = 2), pushing with a dilator (n = 1), and pulling with a snare (n = 2).Conclusion:Difficult TIVAD removal is uncommon. However, operators should expect it when removing long indwelling TIVADs and those with subcutaneous leakage. IR approaches to difficult removal are minimally invasive and can be useful

Clinical Effect of the C-Reactive Protein to Serum Albumin Ratio in Patients with Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer Treated with Trifluridine/Tipiracil

Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is an oral anticancer agent used as a third- or later-line treatment for patients with metastatic gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer (mGC/GEJC). The C-reactive protein-to-serum albumin ratio (CAR) is an inflammation-based prognostic marker in gastric cancer. This retrospective study evaluated CAR’s clinical significance as a prognostic factor in 64 patients with mGC/GEJC administered FTD/TPI as a third- or later-line therapy. Patients were categorized into high- and low-CAR groups based on pre-treatment blood data. This study evaluated associations between CAR and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), clinicopathological features, treatment efficacy, and adverse events. The high-CAR group had significantly worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, a higher prevalence of patients administered with a single course of FTD/TPI, and a higher rate of patients not administered chemotherapy after FTD/TPI therapy than the low-CAR group. Median OS and PFS were significantly poorer in the high-CAR group than in the low-CAR group (113 vs. 399 days; p p < 0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, high CAR was an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS. The overall response rate was not significantly different between the high- and low-CAR groups. Regarding adverse events, the high-CAR group had a significantly lower incidence of neutropenia and a higher incidence of fatigue than the low-CAR group. Therefore, CAR may be a potentially useful prognostic factor for patients with mGC/GEJC treated with FTD/TPI as third- or later-line chemotherapy