Heat Transfer Through Plasma-Sprayed Thermal Barrier Coatings in Gas Turbines: A Review of Recent Work

A review is presented of how heat transfer takes place in plasma-sprayed (zirconia-based) thermal barrier coatings (TBCs) during operation of gas turbines. These characteristics of TBCs are naturally of central importance to their function. Current state-of-the-art TBCs have relatively high levels of porosity (~15%) and the pore architecture (i.e., its morphology, connectivity, and scale) has a strong influence on the heat flow. Contributions from convective, conductive, and radiative heat transfer are considered, under a range of operating conditions, and the characteristics are illustrated with experimental data and modeling predictions. In fact, convective heat flow within TBCs usually makes a negligible contribution to the overall heat transfer through the coating, although what might be described as convection can be important if there are gross through-thickness defects such as segmentation cracks. Radiative heat transfer, on the other hand, can be significant within TBCs, depending on temperature and radiation scattering lengths, which in turn are sensitive to the grain structure and the pore architecture. Under most conditions of current interest, conductive heat transfer is largely predominant. However, it is not only conduction through solid ceramic that is important. Depending on the pore architecture, conduction through gas in the pores can play a significant role, particularly at the high gas pressures typically acting in gas turbines (although rarely applied in laboratory measurements of conductivity). The durability of the pore structure under service conditions is also of importance, and this review covers some recent work on how the pore architecture, and hence the conductivity, is affected by sintering phenomena. Some information is presented concerning the areas in which research and development work needs to be focussed if improvements in coating performance are to be achieved

Variability comparison of simultaneous brain near-infrared spectroscopy and functional magnetic resonance imaging during visual stimulation

Brain near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is emerging as a potential alternative to functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). To date, no study has explicitly compared the two techniques in terms of measurement variability, a key parameter dictating attainable statistical power. Here, NIRS and fMRI were simultaneously recorded during event-related visual stimulation. Inter-subject coefficients of variation (CVs) for peak response amplitude were considerably larger for NIRS than fMRI, but inter-subject CVs for response latency and intra-subject CVs for response amplitude were overall comparable. Our results may represent an optimistic estimate of the CVs of NIRS measurements, as optode positioning was guided by structural MRI, which is normally unavailable. We concluded that fMRI may be preferable to NIRS for group comparisons, but NIRS is equally powerful when comparing conditions within participants. The discrepancy between inter- and intra-subject CVs is likely related to variability in head anatomy and tissue properties, which may be better accounted for by emerging NIRS technolog