Isolated corneal pseudodendrites as the initial manifestation of tyrosinemia type II in monozygotic twins.

Fifteen-month-old twins presented with photophobia and bilateral corneal pseudodendrites, and tyrosinemia type II was suspected. Plasma tyrosine levels were elevated. After therapy with tyrosine-restricted diet, corneal lesions resolved. Bilateral pseudodendritic keratitis may be the initial or only manifestation of tyrosinemia type II

University faculty on student motivation to use medical education apps and barriers to their usage

OBJECTIVE: University teachers, who primarily provide guidance and advice to their students, can play a significant role in educational process transformation. As there is no particular e-learning framework, it is important to understand the factors and variables that may impact both its effective usage and further successful implementation. The current study aims to outline the influence of university faculty, and possible barriers preventing medical students from using apps for learning purposes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Α cross-sectional study was conducted with an online survey questionnaire. The population of the study included 1,458 students from all the seven Greek schools of medicine. RESULTS: University faculty (51.7%), followed by fellow students and friends (55.6%), constitute the second most common source of information on adopting apps for medical education. 45.8% of students rated their educational guidance as insufficient/inadequate, 33.0% as moderate, 18.6% as quite good, and only 2.7% as sufficient/complete. University professors have proposed certain apps to 25.5% of students. PubMed (41.7%), Medscape (20.9%), and Complete Anatomy (12.2%) were the leading suggestions. The main barriers to app usage were the lack of knowledge of apps’ benefits (28.8%), insufficient updates of their content (21.9%), their cost-effectiveness (19.2%), and financial reasons (16.2%). Most students preferred using free apps (51.4%) and 76.7% preferred universities to cover apps’ expenses. CONCLUSIONS: University faculty represent the main source of information regarding the adaptation of medical apps in the educational process. However, students need improved and enhanced guidance. The main barriers are ignorance about apps and financial reasons. The majority prefer free apps and universities to cover their cost

Inventory of current EU paediatric vision and hearing screening programmes

Objective: To examine the diversity in paediatric vision and hearing screening programmes in Europe. Methods: Themes for comparison of screening programmes derived from literature were used to compile three questionnaires on vision, hearing, and public health screening. Tests used, professions involved, age, and frequency of testing seem to influence sensitivity, specificity, and costs most. Questionnaires were sent to ophthalmologists, orthoptists, otolaryngologists, and audiologists involved in paediatric screening in all EU full-member, candidate, and associate states. Answers were cross-checked. Results: Thirty-nine countries participated; 35 have a vision screening programme, 33 a nation-wide neonatal hearing screening programme. Visual acuity (VA) is measured in 35 countries, in 71% of these more than once. First measurement of VA varies from three to seven years of age, but is usually before age five. At age three and four, picture charts, including Lea Hyvarinen, are used most; in children over four, Tumbling-E and Snellen. As first hearing screening test, otoacoustic emission is used most in healthy neonates, and auditory brainstem response in premature newborns. The majority of hearing testing programmes are staged; children are referred after 1–4 abnormal tests. Vision screening is performed mostly by paediatricians, ophthalmologists, or nurses. Funding is mostly by health insurance or state. Coverage was reported as >95% in half of countries, but reporting was often not first-hand. Conclusion: Largest differences were found in VA charts used (12), professions involved in vision screening (10), number of hearing screening tests before referral (1–4), and funding sources (8). © 2015, The Author(s) 2015 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav