5 research outputs found

    ΠœΠ•Π’ΠžΠ”ΠžΠ›ΠžΠ“Π˜Π― РАБЧЕВА ΠŸΠ›ΠžΠ©ΠΠ”Π˜ Π›ΠžΠšΠΠ›Π¬ΠΠžΠ“Πž ΠžΠ’Π•ΠšΠ ΠšΠžΠ–Π˜ ПРИ Π ΠΠšΠ• ΠœΠžΠ›ΠžΠ§ΠΠžΠ™ Π–Π•Π›Π•Π—Π«

    Get PDF
    Breast cancer with skin involvement is one of the least studied and at the same time difficult to treat forms of cancer. Despite the achievements of modern diagnostics, many issues related to skin edema severity evaluation and quantitative assessment of changes associated with neoadjuvant drug therapy often cause a number of difficulties. In turn, this can lead to both incorrect staging and Β«overtreatmentΒ» of patients, as well as subjectivity in assessing the response to the treatment. Various approaches have been proposed to calculate the severity of edema, but they have not been widely accepted. This article presents our method developed for determining the area of skin edema, which in the future will allow individualizing approaches to treatment.Π Π°ΠΊ ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ‹ с Π²ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠΆΠΈ β€” ΠΎΠ΄Π½Π° ΠΈΠ· Π½Π°ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π΅ ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΈ, Π² Ρ‚ΠΎ ΠΆΠ΅ врСмя, слоТно ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΄Π°ΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΡ…ΡΡ Π»Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌ. НСсмотря Π½Π° достиТСния соврСмСнной диагностики, ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠ΅ вопросы, ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ°ΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΠ΅ΡΡ опрСдСлСния стСпСни выраТСнности ΠΎΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΠ° ΠΊΠΎΠΆΠΈ ΠΈ количСствСнной ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π½Π° Ρ„ΠΎΠ½Π΅ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ°Π΄ΡŠΡŽΠ²Π°Π½Ρ‚Π½ΠΎΠΉ лСкарствСнной Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ, Π·Π°Ρ‡Π°ΡΡ‚ΡƒΡŽ Π²Ρ‹Π·Ρ‹Π²Π°ΡŽΡ‚ ряд слоТностСй. Π’ свою ΠΎΡ‡Π΅Ρ€Π΅Π΄ΡŒ, это ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ‚ привСсти ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΊ Π½Π΅ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΈΠ»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡƒ ΡΡ‚Π°Π΄ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡŽ ΠΈ Β«ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π»Π΅Ρ‡ΠΈΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡŽΒ» ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ², Ρ‚Π°ΠΊ ΠΈ ΠΊ ΡΡƒΠ±ΡŠΠ΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΈ Π² ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠ΅ ΠΎΡ‚Π²Π΅Ρ‚Π° Π½Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΅ Π»Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. Π Π°Π½Π΅Π΅ Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ‹ Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹ для расчСта стСпСни выраТСнности ΠΎΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΠ°, ΠΎΠ΄Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎ ΡˆΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ распространСния ΠΎΠ½ΠΈ Π½Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡƒΡ‡ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ. Π’ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΠ΅ прСдставлСн Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ Π½Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄, ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΠΉ ΠΎΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΡ‰Π°Π΄ΡŒ ΠΎΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΠ° ΠΊΠΎΠΆΠΈ, ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹ΠΉ Π² дальнСйшСм ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ΄ΡƒΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹ ΠΊ Π»Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ

    Π’Ρ‹Π±ΠΎΡ€ ΠΎΠΏΡ‚ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²Π°Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π½Ρ‚Π° Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΊΠΈ мСтастатичСских лимфатичСских ΡƒΠ·Π»ΠΎΠ² Ρƒ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ‹

    Get PDF
    Often, neoadjuvant treatment in patients with locally advanced breast cancer leads to complete clinical and pathomorphological regression of not only the primary tumor, but metastatic lymph nodes also. Currently, discussions are ongoing regarding the optimal volume of surgical intervention on regional lymph nodes in this category of patients. As a de-escalation of classical lymphadenectomy, a method of targeted axillary dissection (TAD) is used, which presumes a biopsy of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) with the removal of a previously marked metastatic lymph node. Our study is aimed at choosing the most optimal method for labeling a metastatic lymph node. The study included 63 patients diagnosed with stage T1–3N1M0 breast cancer, all divided into two comparison groups: 29 patients had a radiopaque label placed in the metastatic lymph node before neoadjuvant therapy, and 33 patients had a radioisotope label (with I125).After the neoadjuvant treatment completion, all patients with complete clinical response in the lymph nodes underwent targeted axillary lymphadenectomy. We evaluated the time of the surgical intervention, the length of the skin incision, the presence of complications when using one or another type of marking. Based on the results of statistical analysis, we propose a variant with a radioisotope label for implementation into the clinical practice. This method, in our opinion, presented the best qualities, reliability and convenience for the surgeon, comfort for the patient.НСрСдко ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ°Π΄ΡŠΡŽΠ²Π°Π½Ρ‚Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ лСкарствСнного лСчСния Ρƒ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠΊ с мСстно-распространСнной Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠΎΠΉ Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠ° ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ‹ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ‚ ΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΠΉ клиничСской ΠΈ патоморфологичСской рСгрСссии Π½Π΅ Ρ‚ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠΊΠΎ самой ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π²ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ, Π½ΠΎ ΠΈ мСтастатичСских лимфатичСских ΡƒΠ·Π»ΠΎΠ². Π’ настоящСС врСмя ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ°ΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ дискуссии ΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΡ‚ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ объСма хирургичСского Π²ΠΌΠ΅ΡˆΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΡΡ‚Π²Π° Π½Π° Ρ€Π΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… Π»ΠΈΠΌΡ„ΠΎΡƒΠ·Π»Π°Ρ… Ρƒ этой ΠΊΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Π³ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ…. Π’ качСствС дСэскалации классичСской лимфадСнэктомии примСняСтся Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ таргСтная аксиллярная диссСкция (ВАД), Π° ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ биопсии «стороТСвых» Π»ΠΈΠΌΡ„ΠΎΡƒΠ·Π»ΠΎΠ² (Π‘Π‘Π›Π£) с ΡƒΠ΄Π°Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Ρ€Π°Π½Π΅Π΅ Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ мСтастатичСского Π»ΠΈΠΌΡ„ΠΎΡƒΠ·Π»Π°. НашС исслСдованиС Π½Π°Ρ†Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ Π½Π° Π²Ρ‹Π±ΠΎΡ€ Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΠΎΠΏΡ‚ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ способа ΠΌΠ°Ρ€ΠΊΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠΈ мСтастатичСского Π»ΠΈΠΌΡ„ΠΎΡƒΠ·Π»Π°. Π’ Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚Ρƒ Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½Ρ‹ 63 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΊΠΈ с Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠΌ Ρ€Π°ΠΊ ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ‹ T1–3N1М0 стадии, всС Ρ€Π°Π·Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Ρ‹ Π½Π° Π΄Π²Π΅ Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΡ‹ сравнСния: 29 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΊΠ°ΠΌ Π΄ΠΎ провСдСния Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ°Π΄ΡŠΡŽΠ²Π°Π½Ρ‚Π½ΠΎΠΉ Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ Π² мСтастатичСский Π»ΠΈΠΌΡ„ΠΎΡƒΠ·Π΅Π» Π±Ρ‹Π»Π° установлСна рСнтгСнконтрастная ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΊΠ°, Π° 33 Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌ β€” радиоизотопная ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΊΠ° (с I125). ПослС окончания лСкарствСнного лСчСния всСм Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌ с ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ Π»Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π±Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ ΠΏΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌΠΎΡ€Ρ„ΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠΌ Π½Π° Π»ΠΈΠΌΡ„ΠΎΡƒΠ·Π»Π°Ρ… Π²Ρ‹ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½Π° таргСтная аксиллярная лимфадСнэктомия. Π’ Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚Π΅ ΡƒΡ‡ΠΈΡ‚Ρ‹Π²Π°Π»ΠΎΡΡŒ врСмя выполнСния ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΌΠ΅ΡˆΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΡΡ‚Π²Π°, Π΄Π»ΠΈΠ½Π° ΠΊΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ€Π΅Π·Π°, Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΠ΅ ослоТнСний ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ использовании Ρ‚ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π° Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΊΠΈ. ΠžΠΏΠΈΡ€Π°ΡΡΡŒ Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹ статистичСского Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°, для внСдрСния Π² ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΡƒΡŽ ΠΏΡ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΡƒ ΠΌΡ‹ ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π»Π°Π³Π°Π΅ΠΌ Π²Π°Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π½Ρ‚ с Ρ€Π°Π΄ΠΈΠΎΠΈΠ·ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΠΏΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΊΠΎΠΉ. ИмСнно этот ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄, Π½Π° наш взгляд, прСдставил Π½Π°ΠΈΠ»ΡƒΡ‡ΡˆΠΈΠ΅ качСства, Π° ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎ Π½Π°Π΄Π΅ΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΈ удобство для Π²Ρ€Π°Ρ‡Π°-Ρ…ΠΈΡ€ΡƒΡ€Π³Π°, ΠΊΠΎΠΌΡ„ΠΎΡ€Ρ‚ для ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π°

    Choice of a way to verify space-occupying lesions of the breast at a preoperative stage

    No full text
    Preoperative verification of breast cancer (BC) is a necessary stage of diagnosis. The main method for obtaining materials is fine-needle aspiration biopsy that is of low informative value in a number of cases. Histological biopsy of nonpalpable breast masses extends the verification capabilities of accurate diagnosis and determines the choice and tactics of combination and complex treatments in patients with BC just at a preoperative stage, and, in case of detection of a benign tumor, enables one to abandon sector resection with an urgent histological study

    Capabilities of percutaneous biopsy methods to preoperatively verify breast microcalcinates

    No full text
    Information on the morphological type of a tumor is of crucial importance for successfully planning the treatment of patients with breast cancer (BC). Technological progress in the past decade has led to quality improvement in the diagnosis of particularly nonpalpable BC, one of whose manifestations is microcalcinates. Adequate use of mini-invasive procedures for obtaining materials for morphological analysis is favorable for extending the capabilities of accurate preoperative diagnosis verification to effectively plan a patient treatment and rehabilitation program
    corecore