11 research outputs found
Molecular-genetic bases of plumage coloring in chicken
The color of plumage in birds is an important feature, often determining descent to a particular species or breed. It serves as a key factor in the interaction of birds with each other due to their well-developed visual perception of the surrounding world. In poultry including chickens, the color of the plumage can be treated as a genetic marker, useful for identifying breeds, populations and breeding groups with their specific traits. The origin of diverse color plumage is the result of two interrelated physical processes, chemical and optical, due to which pigment and structural colors in the color are formed. The pigment melanin, which is presented in two forms, eumelanin and pheomelanin, is widely spread in birds. The basis for the formation of melanin is the aromatic amino acid tyrosine. The process of melano-genesis involves many loci, part of the complex expression of plumage color genes. In birds, the solid black color locus encodes the melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R), mutations in which lead to a change in receptor activation and form different variants of the E locus. Using the GWAS analysis, possible genes affecting the formation of color in chickens were detected. The biosynthesis and types of melanin are affected by the activity of the enzyme tyrosine, and mutations in the tyrosinase gene (TYR) cause albinism in different species. The formation mechanism of brown, silver, gold, lavender and a number of other shades is determined by the influence on the work of the MC1R genes and TYR specific modifier genes. Thus, locus I currently associated with the PMEL17 gene inhibits the expression of eumelanin, and the MLPH gene affects tyrosinase function. Research on the mechanisms of formation of the secondary coloring of plumage in chickens is being actively conducted nowadays. The formation of a marble feather pattern is associated with the mutation of the endothelin B2 receptor (EDNRB2), in the coding part of the gene of which a polymorphism is found associated with the mo locus. The molecular base that causes the feather banding (locus B and autosomal recessive banding) is identified. Today, only some genes that determine the color of the plumage of chickens are studied and described. Different genes can produce similar plumage patterns, and different phenotypes can be determined by the polymorphism of a single gene. Using molecular methods, you can more accurately identify these differences. This overview shows the nature of melanin coloration in birds using the example of chickens of various breeds and also attempts to systematize knowledge about the molecular-genetic mechanisms of the appearance of various types of coloration
Efficiency of using SNP markers in the <i>MSTN</i> gene in the selection of the Pushkin breed chickens
In the poultry industry, indicators reflecting the growth rate of young stock and the exterior characteristics of chickens are important benchmarks for breeding. Traditional selection based on phenotypic evaluation is characterized by low efficiency with a low character inheritance ratio and is difficult to apply in small groups of animals and birds bred in bioresource collections. The use of molecular genetic markers associated with economically important traits makes it possible to carry out early selection of birds. This entails an increase in the profitability of the poultry industry. Recently, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have served as convenient markers for selection purposes. For five generations (P1βP5), an experimental selection of hens of the Pushkin breed was carried out for live weight. It was based on selection for single nucleotide polymorphism rs313744840 in the MSTN gene. As a result, a significant increase in the frequency of allele A in this gene, from 0.11 to 0.50, took place. The association of SNP markers with meat qualities in the experimental group led to changes in the exterior profile of an adult bird at 330 days of age. The individuals with the AA and AG genotypes had the greatest live weight and longest body. As a result of selection, the bird on average became larger due to an increase in the number of heterozygous individuals with long bodies and large chest girths. The depth of the chest and the width of the pelvis increased due to an increase in the frequency of allele A in the experimental population. A tendency towards an increase in these indicators with the substitution of G with A in the genotype was found. Saturation of the population with desirable alleles led to an increase in the average live weight of the chickens. Analysis of the exterior parameters of adult birds showed that this growth is achieved by increasing the depth and volume of the bird body, and not by increasing the length of the limbs. Thus, marker selection carried out for five generations in the experimental population of Pushkin breed chickens to increase body weight has reliably (p < 0.001) changed the exterior profile of adult birds
The rate of weight gain and productivity of chicken broiler cross with various polymorphic types of myostatin gene
The search for single nucleotide polymorphismsΒ (SNP) in the myostatin gene is a promising directionΒ of research as this gene is involved in the developmentΒ of important biological and productive traitsΒ in chicken. Using PCR-RFLP technique, an analysisΒ of allele and genotype frequencies in Cornish chickenΒ breed of G5 line of Smena-8 cross has been conducted.Β Two pairs of primers allowing PCR product to beΒ obtained in the myostatin gene have been used.Β Two single nucleotide substitutions on exon 1 ofΒ the myostatin gene have been under investigation:Β G/A in MST2109 and G/Π‘ in MST2244. A signifiantΒ predominance of deoxynucleotide G in MST2244Β over C and deoxynucleotide A over G in MST2109Β has been observed. Differences in productive traitsΒ between genotypes in MST2109 were not detected.Β Analysis of allelic variability by MST2244 locus showedΒ statistically significant differences in live weightΒ at the age of 7 days between CC and G2G2 genotypesΒ (p < 0.01), CG2 and G2G2 (p < 0.05). G2G2 individualsΒ (203.52 g) were significantly heavier than CC (179.5 g)Β and CG2 (193.95 g) chickens at the age of 7 days.Β Statistically significant differences between the CCΒ and G2G2 genotypes in live weight at the age of 33Β days have been revealed (p < 0.05). Thus, this researchΒ has led to a better understanding of allele frequenciesΒ in the myostatin gene in line G5 of Cornish breed.Β The results obtained will allow particular myostatinΒ gene-based genotypes to be taken into accountΒ for accelerating the breeding process in the broilerΒ poultry industry
Clinical correlations of neuron-specific enolase in patients with first-ever ischemic stroke after systemic thrombolysis
Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) was studied in 24 in patients with first-ever ischemic stroke on admission and on the third day after systemic thrombolysis. Control group consisted of 9 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers. There was no difference in NSE levels between groups. Significant correlations of NSE levels with Rivermid mobility index (inverse) and Rankin scale (direct) on discharge were revealed. NSE levels were significantly higher in lethal cases compared with survivors. No correlations of NSE with the volume of ischemic zone were present. Conclusion: these results indicate that neuron-specific enolase may be an indicator of clinical prognosis of ischemic stroke. At the same time NSE level doesnβt give an opportunity to prognose the volume of ischemic lesion after systemic thrombolysis.ΠΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΉΡΠΎΠ½-ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ»Π°Π·Ρ (ΠΠ‘Π) ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ Π½Π° ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΉ Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ° Ρ 24 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ° Ρ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΡΠΌ Π² ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½ΠΈ ΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ»ΡΡΠΎΠΌ. ΠΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»Ρ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ 9 ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ Π·Π΄ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
Π΄ΠΎΠ±ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π² ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π° ΠΈ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ°. Π£ΡΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΈ ΠΠ‘Π Π² Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ΅ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ΅ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎ Π½Π΅ ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΡ. ΠΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Ρ ΠΠ‘Π Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠΌΠΈ Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ° ΠΏΡΠΈ Π²ΡΠΏΠΈΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΈΠ· ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ° - ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΈΡ Ρ ΠΈΠ½Π΄Π΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π ΠΈΠ²Π΅ΡΠΌΠΈΠ΄ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΡΠΌΠ°Ρ Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΌ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΠΊΠ°Π»Π΅ Π ΡΠ½ΠΊΠΈΠ½. Π£ΡΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΈ ΠΠ‘Π ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎ Π²ΡΡΠ΅ Π² Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ΅ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ², ΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡ
Π² ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΌ Π² Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ΅ Π²ΡΠΆΠΈΠ²ΡΠΈΡ
. ΠΠ΅ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΎ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΠ‘Π Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ°Π³Π°. ΠΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄: ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΡ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π½Π΅ΠΉΡΠΎΠ½-ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΡΡ ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ»Π°Π·Ρ Π² ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Ρ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·Π° ΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°. ΠΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅ Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΠ‘Π Π½Π΅ Π΄Π°Π΅Ρ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π±ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ°Π³Π° ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ°
Emotional disturbances in patients with first-ever acute ischemic stroke
Objective: Π’ΠΎ evaluate the neuropsychological status of patients during the acute period of the first ischemic stroke. The study included 25 patients aged 65,72 Β± 12,49 years (M Β± StD) 1 -3 and 19-21 days for ischemic stroke. With the scale of assessment of mental status (MMSE), the scale of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Beck Depression Inventory, Spielberger anxiety scale, Questionnaire coping strategies Lazarus. By the end of the acute period in patients observed reduction of neurological deficit figure for NIHSS score decreased by 66.4%. Also, there was a significant positive trend in relation to the cognitive status of patients. The level of depression at the beginning of the disease by questionnaire Beck averaged 15.60 points. By the end of the acute period of depressive symptoms regressed on the average level of depression was 11.1IU. Anxiety patients by the end of the acute period or remained at the same level, or slightly reduced. A direct correlation of the degree of neurological deficit by NIHSS and the level of depression on the scale of Beck's depression level and the level of personal anxiety. There was an inverse correlation between the index of MMSE cognitive status and depression levels. Conclusion. Emotional disorders observed in patients with acute ischemic stroke first, correlate with the severity of motor deficit. Intensity of depression decreases during the acute period, while anxiety disorders by the end of this period persist.Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ: ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ Π½Π΅ΠΉΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΡΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°. ΠΠ±ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ 25 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π² Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ 65,72Β±12,49 Π»Π΅Ρ (M+StD) Π½Π° 1-3 ΠΈ 19-21 Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°. Π‘ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠΊΠ°Π»Ρ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ° (MMSE), ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΠ°Π»Ρ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΉ (ΠΠΎΠ‘Π), ΡΠΊΠ°Π»Ρ Π΄Π΅ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΠ΅ΠΊΠ°, ΡΠΊΠ°Π»Ρ ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π‘ΠΏΠΈΠ»Π±Π΅ΡΠ³Π΅ΡΠ°, ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΠ½Π³-ΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΉ ΠΠ°Π·Π°ΡΡΡΠ°. Π ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡ ΠΎΡΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄Π° Ρ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π°Π»Π°ΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΠΊΡΠΈΡ Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ°, ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Ρ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΠΊΠ°Π»Π΅ NIHSS ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠΈΠ»ΡΡ Π½Π° 66,4%. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π°Π»Π°ΡΡ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠ° Π² ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ° ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ². Π£ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½Ρ Π΄Π΅ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΈ Π² Π½Π°ΡΠ°Π»Π΅ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΡ ΠΠ΅ΠΊΠ° ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΠ» Π² ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Π½Π΅ΠΌ 15,60 Π±Π°Π»Π»ΠΎΠ². Π ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡ ΠΎΡΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄Π° ΡΠΈΠΌΠΏΡΠΎΠΌΡ Π΄Π΅ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈ, Π² ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Π½Π΅ΠΌ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½Ρ Π΄Π΅ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ» ME 11,1. Π’ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΊ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡ ΠΎΡΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΎΡΡΠ°Π»Π°ΡΡ Π»ΠΈΠ±ΠΎ Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ½Π΅ΠΌ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅, Π»ΠΈΠ±ΠΎ Π½Π΅Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΠ»Π°ΡΡ. ΠΠ±Π½Π°ΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΡΠΌΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½ΠΈ Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎ NIHSS ΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ Π΄Π΅ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΠΊΠ°Π»Π΅ ΠΠ΅ΠΊΠ°, ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ Π΄Π΅ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ. ΠΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π° ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎ MMSE ΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ Π΄Π΅ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΈ. ΠΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄. ΠΠΌΠΎΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΡΠ²Π°, Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ΡΡ Ρ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π² ΠΎΡΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄Π΅ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°, ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈΡΡΡΡ Ρ Π²ΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΠΌΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ°. ΠΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π΄Π΅ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΡΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄Π°, Π² ΡΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΊ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡ ΡΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΡ
DEFORMATION FEATURES OF THE CENTRAL LAYERS OF Fe - 3%Si(110)[hkl] ALLOY BY ROLLING WITH A ROLL DIAMETER OF 90 MM
The article presents the results of studies of the effect of initial crystallographic orientation and deformation modes on rolling texture in the central layer of Fe - 3%Si(110)[hkl] single crystals. Several groups of samples of single crystals were rolled under laboratory conditions. The groups of samples were classified according to the final deformation rate, the ideal crystallographic orientation of the rolling plane and deflections of the direction of the ideal orientation plane from the rolling direction. The methodology of the experiment took into account the amount of reduction rate during one rolling. Radiographic method was used to analyze the results of rolling. The obtained data was superimposed on a stereographic projection, and straight pole figures were built. The results of decoding direct pole figures revealed differences in the formation of the texture from the previously obtained results. The research shows the manifestation of the one-component deformation texture in the central layer
[Studying the structure of a gene pool population of the Russian White chicken breed by genome-wide SNP scan] ΠΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π±Π΅Π»ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΊΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ SNP-ΡΠΊΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ
A population of the Russian White chickens, bred at the gene pool farm of ARRIFAGB for 25 generations using individual selection, is characterized by resistance to a lowered temperature in the early postnatal period and white colour of the embryonic down. In 2002-2012, breeding was carried out by panmixia, and by now a new population of the Russian White chickens has been formed on the basis of the surviving stock. Comparison of the genetic variability of this population and the archival DNA of representatives of the 2001 population using microarray screening technology will help to assess the population structure and the preservation of the unique characteristics of its genome. The material for the study was DNA extracted from 162 chicken blood samples. Two groups of the Russian White breed were studied, the 2001 population and the current population. Genome-wide analysis using single nucleotide markers (SNP) included screening by means of the Illumina Chicken 60K SNP iSelect BeadChip microarray. Quality control of genotyping, determination of the population genetic structure by multidimensional scaling (MDS), calculation of linkage disequilibrium (LD) and allele frequency in the groups were carried out using PLINK 1.9 software program. The construction of a cluster delimitation model based on SNP genotypes was carried out using the ADMIXTURE program. According to the MDS analysis results, the current population can be divided into four MDS groups, which, when compared to the data of the pedigree, adequately reflect the origin of the studied individuals. The representatives of the ancestral population were genetically similar to the MDS3 group of the current population. Using the F-statistic of the two-way analysis of variance, a significant effect of the group, chromosome, chromosome in the group, and the distance between SNP markers on LD (r2) values was observed. In the 2001 group, the maximum r2 and the high incidence of LD equal to 1 were observed for all chromosomes, with a distance between SNP markers being 500-1000 Kb. There was also the greatest number of monomorphic alleles in this group. Based on the SNP analysis, we may conclude that the current Russian White chicken population is characterized by the disintegration of long LD regions of the ancestral population. Modelling clusters using the ADMIXTURE program revealed differences between the current population groups determined by MDS analysis. The groups composed of individuals included in MDS1 and MDS2 had a homogeneous structure and differed from each other at K = 4 and K = 5. The MDS4 group formed a genetically heterogeneous cluster different from the MDS1 and MDS2 groups at K of 2-5. The MDS3 group was phylogenetically close to the 2001 population (at K of 2-5). In general, the analysis of the current gene pool population of the Russian White chickens showed its heterogeneity while one of its groups (MDS3) was similar to the ancestral population of 2001, which in turn is characterized by a large number of monomorphic alleles and a high frequency of long LD regions. Thus, SNP scanning allowed evaluating the genetic similarity of individuals and the population structure of the Russian White chicken breed. Understanding the genetic structure is an important point in the panmictic breeding and tracking of historical changes in the molecular organization of the genome of a gene pool population with a limited number of animals.
ΠΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π±Π΅Π»ΡΡ
ΠΊΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π»Π°ΡΡ Π² Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π΄Π½ΠΎΠΌ Ρ
ΠΎΠ·ΡΠΉΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΠΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΠΠ Π³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΊΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠ·ΡΠΉΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
(ΠΠΠΠΠΠ Π) Π² ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ 25 ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Ρ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π±ΠΎΡΠ°. ΠΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ β ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ΅ Π²ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΡΠ°Π½Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ½Π°ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄ ΠΈ Π±Π΅Π»ΡΠΉ ΡΠ²Π΅Ρ ΡΠΌΠ±ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΡ
Π°. Π 2002-2012 Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π°Ρ
Π΅Π΅ ΡΠ°Π·Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ»ΠΎΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠ°Π½ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ, ΠΈ ΠΊ Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΡΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ²ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π° Π½ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π±Π΅Π»ΡΡ
ΠΊΡΡ. ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΡ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ SNP-ΡΠΊΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ (single nucleotide polymorphisms) Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄ ΠΊΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π°ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΡΡ Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π±Π΅Π»ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ 2001 Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π°. ΠΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ Π΄Π²Π΅ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ ΠΊΡΡ: ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡ 2001 Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π° (6 Π³ΠΎΠ»., Π½Π΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈ ΠΈΠ· Π΄Π²ΡΡ
Π»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΉ) ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡ (156 Π³ΠΎΠ».). SNP-Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π» ΡΠΊΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠ½Π³ 162 ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΠΠ Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΏΠ° Illumina Chicken 60K SNP iSelect BeadChip (Β«IlluminaΒ», Π‘Π¨Π). ΠΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»Ρ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΡΠΈΠΏΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ (multidimensional scaling, MDS), ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ Π½Π΅ΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ (linkage disequilibrium, LD) ΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΎΡΡ Π²ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π°Π»Π»Π΅Π΅ΠΉ ΠΏΠΎ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ°ΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π² ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠ΅ PLINK 1.9. ΠΠΎΡΡΡΠΎΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ² Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ SNP-Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ² ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ»ΠΈ Ρ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΡ ADMIXTURE. ΠΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌ MDS-Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡ Π±ΡΠ»Π° ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π° Π½Π° ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅ MDS-Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ, ΡΡΠΎ Π² ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Ρ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π°Π΄Π΅ΠΊΠ²Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ°Π΅Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅ΠΉ. ΠΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ Π³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Π½Ρ Ρ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠΎΠΉ MDS3. Π‘ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ F-ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄ΠΈΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ, Ρ
ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠΎΠΌΡ, Ρ
ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠΎΠΌΡ Π² Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ΅ ΠΈ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ SNP-ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΊΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π½Π° Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ LD (r2). Π Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ΅ 2001 Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΏΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌ Ρ
ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌ Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ r2 ΠΈ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠ°Ρ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΎΡΠ° Π²ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ LD, ΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ 1, ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ SNP-ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΊΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ 500-1000 ΠΠ±. ΠΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π°Π»Π»Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ Π² ΡΡΠΎΠΉ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΠΌΡΠΌ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈΠΌ. ΠΠ° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ SNP-Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π°Π½ Π²ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠΌ, ΡΡΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π±Π΅Π»ΡΡ
ΠΊΡΡ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ·ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΠ°Π΄ΠΎΠΌ Π΄Π»ΠΈΠ½Π½ΡΡ
LD-ΡΠ°ΠΉΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ. ΠΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ² Π² ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠ΅ ADMIXTURE Π²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ»ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ, ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ MDS-Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°. ΠΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ, ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠ· ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅ΠΉ, Π²Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠΈΡ
Π² MDS1 ΠΈ MDS2, ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΡ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ ΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΈ K = 4 ΠΈ K = 5. ΠΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ° MDS4 ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ²Π°Π»Π° Π³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠ΅Ρ, ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΡ ΠΎΡ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏ MDS1 ΠΈ MDS2 ΠΏΡΠΈ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ
K ΠΎΡ 2 Π΄ΠΎ 5. ΠΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ° MDS3 Π±ΡΠ»Π° ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ Π±Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠ° ΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ 2001 Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π° (ΠΏΡΠΈ K ΠΎΡ 2 Π΄ΠΎ 5). Π’Π°ΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠΌ, Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π±Π΅Π»ΡΡ
ΠΊΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π» Π΅Π΅ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΈ ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ MDS3 Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ 2001 Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π°, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ°Ρ, Π² ΡΠ²ΠΎΡ ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π΄Ρ, Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π»Π°ΡΡ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΌ ΡΠΈΡΠ»ΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π°Π»Π»Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΈ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΉ Π²ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π΄Π»ΠΈΠ½Π½ΡΡ
LD-ΡΠ°ΠΉΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ². SNP-ΡΠΊΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ»ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ Π³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅ΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π±Π΅Π»ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΊΡΡ. ΠΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ Π²Π°ΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΏΠ°Π½ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ°Π·Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΎΡΡΠ»Π΅ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π² ΠΌΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ° Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ Ρ ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌ
Association of polymorphic variants in MSTN, PRL, and DRD2 genes with intensity of young animal growth in Pushkin breed chickens
Diversities in the Gut Microbial Patterns in Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases and Certain Heart Failure Phenotypes
To continue progress in the treatment of cardiovascular disease, there is a need to improve the overall understanding of the processes that contribute to the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Exploring the role of gut microbiota in various heart diseases is a topic of great interest since it is not so easy to find such reliable connections despite the fact that microbiota undoubtedly affect all body systems. The present study was conducted to investigate the composition of gut microbiota in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and heart failure syndromes with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved EF (HFpEF), and to compare these results with the microbiota of individuals without those diseases (control group). Fecal microbiota were evaluated by three methods: living organisms were determined using bacterial cultures, total DNA taxonomic composition was estimated by next generation sequencing (NGS) of 16S rRNA gene (V3–V4) and quantitative assessment of several taxa was performed using qPCR (quantitative polymerase chain reaction). Regarding the bacterial culture method, all disease groups demonstrated a decrease in abundance of Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis in comparison to the control group. The HFrEF group was characterized by an increased abundance of Streptococcus sanguinus and Streptococcus parasanguinis. NGS analysis was conducted at the family level. No significant differences between patient’s groups were observed in alpha-diversity indices (Shannon, Faith, Pielou, Chao1, Simpson, and Strong) with the exception of the Faith index for the HFrEF and control groups. Erysipelotrichaceae were significantly increased in all three groups; Streptococcaceae and Lactobacillaceae were significantly increased in ASCVD and HFrEF groups. These observations were indirectly confirmed with the culture method: two species of Streptococcus were significantly increased in the HFrEF group and Lactobacillus plantarum was significantly increased in the ASCVD group. The latter observation was also confirmed with qPCR of Lactobacillus sp. Acidaminococcaceae and Odoribacteraceae were significantly decreased in the ASCVD and HFrEF groups. Participants from the HFpEF group showed the least difference compared to the control group in all three study methods. The patterns found expand the knowledge base on possible correlations of gut microbiota with cardiovascular diseases. The similarities and differences in conclusions obtained by the three methods of this study demonstrate the need for a comprehensive approach to the analysis of microbiota