Risks and Rewards of Advanced Practice Providers in Cardiothoracic Surgery Training: National Survey

Background Changes in healthcare have led to increasing utilization of Advanced Practice Providers (APPs), but their role in Cardiothoracic Surgery (CTS) education remains undefined. This study aimed to analyze the extent of APP utilization on the CTS team, their role within the hierarchy of clinical care, and the impact of PEs on CTS training from the resident perspective. Methods CTS residents’ responses to the 2017 Thoracic Surgery Residents Association (TSRA)/Thoracic Surgery Directors Association (TSDA) In-Service Training Examination (ITE) survey regarding the role of APPs in specific clinical scenarios, and perception of APP contribution to residents’ educational environment were analyzed. Statistical analysis of categorical variables was performed in SPSS using a Fisher’s exact test and Pearson Chi-Square with statistical significance set at p<0.05. Results Response rate was 82.1% (280/341). The median number of employed APPs was 16-20 and 50.4% (n=141) reported 11-25 PEs at their institution. The median forAPPs in the operating room, floor, and intensive care unit was 3, 3, and 2 respectively. Overall impression of APPs was positive in 87.5% (n=245) of respondents, with 47.7% (n=133) being “very positive” and 40.1% being “positive” (n=112). In general, residents reported greater resident involvement in post-operative issues and operative consults and greater APP involvement in floor issues. 72.5% of residents had not missed a surgical opportunity due to APPs while, 9.6% missed an opportunity due to a APP despite being at an appropriate level of training. Of those that reported missed opportunities, 44% were I-6 residents. There were no significant differences in APPs’ operative role based on resident seniority. Conclusions The overall impression of APPs among CTS residents is favorable, and they more commonly are involved assisting on the floor or the operating room. Occasionally, residents report missing a surgical opportunity due to APPs. There is further opportunity to optimize and standardize their role within programs, in order to improve clinical outcomes and enhance the CTS educational experience for residents

Current Status of Endovascular Training for Cardiothoracic Surgery Residents in the United States

Background Endovascular interventions for cardiovascular pathology are becoming increasingly relevant to cardiothoracic surgery. This study assessed the perceived prevalence and efficacy of endovascular skills training and identified differences among training paradigms. Methods Trainee responses to questions in the 2016 In-Service Training Examination survey regarding endovascular training were analyzed based on the four different cardiothoracic surgery training pathways: traditional 2- and 3-year thoracic, integrated 6-year, and combined 4+3 general and thoracic residency programs. Results The duration of endovascular training was substantially different among programs, at a median of 17 weeks for integrated 6-year, 8.5 weeks for 3-year, 6 weeks for 4+3, and 4 weeks for 2-year residency (p < 0.0001). After adjusting for year of training and program type, the duration of endovascular rotations was significantly associated with self-assessed comfort with catheter-based skills (p < 0.0001). Eighty-two percent of residents rotated with trainees from other specialties, and 58% experienced competition for cases. Residents reported greater exposure to transcatheter aortic valve replacement than to thoracic endovascular aortic repair, cardiac catheterization, percutaneous closure of atrial septal defect, and transcatheter mitral valve surgery (p < 0.0001). A significant proportion of responders reported feeling uncomfortable performing key steps of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (52%) or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (49%). Conclusions Considerable heterogeneity exists in endovascular training among cardiothoracic surgery training pathways, with a significant number of residents having minimal to no exposure to these emerging techniques. These findings highlight the need for a standardized curriculum to improve endovascular exposure and training

\u3ci\u3eFrom Nation to States: The Small Cities Community Development Block Grant Program\u3c/i\u3e

Editors: Edward T. Jennings, Dale Krane(UNO faculty member), Alex N. Pattakos, and B.J. Reed (UNO faculty member) The advent of the Reagan administration\u27s New Federalism initiatives in 1981 impacted state government in numerous ways. One example of this new era in intergovernmental relations is the transfer of responsibility of the Small Cities Community Development Block Grant Program from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to state governments. This volume provides an overview of the Small Cities CDBG program, an analysis of its politics, and an examination of the grant award processes established by the states. It concludes with an assessment of the consequences of state assumption for program activities, outcomes, and administration. Assessing the program transfer within the context of theories and practices of intergovernmental relations and policy execution, the book provides rich contextual information and a thorough comparison of implementation activities and outputs in seven states.https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/facultybooks/1194/thumbnail.jp