10 research outputs found
Π€Π°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΡ ΠΈ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ ΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Π² Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ
Private health spending in modern developed countries varies considerably depending on the national policy objectives, selected regulatory instruments as well as general socio-economic conditions.The objective of this paper is to analyze key determinants of private health spending.Materials and Methods. To achieve this objective we analyze academic works dealing with theoretical and empirical studies of private health spending.Results. From the analysis the effects of private health spending determining national health financing policy, significant discretionary (breadth and depth of social healthcare system, public health expenditure, regulatory measures on cost sharing, paid medical services, voluntary health insurance) and non-discretionary factors (relative health services price, income and its distribution, age structure, level of education, political preferences) were highlighted.Conclusion. In developed countries priorities of health private spending regulatory policy now are ensuring accessibility of essential health care and preventing consumerβs moral hazard. The most significant discretionary factor influencing the share and amount of private health spending is the management of state guarantees of free medical care; the most significant non-discretionary factor is the income and its distribution.Π£ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Π½Π° Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΡΡ
ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π°Ρ
ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π² Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡ ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ, Π²ΡΠ±ΡΠ°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠΈΡ
ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΉ.Π¦Π΅Π»ΡΡ Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΡΡ
Π΄Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠΌΠΈΠ½Π°Π½Ρ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Π² Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ.ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ. ΠΠ»Ρ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ Π±ΡΠ» ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡ, ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΈ ΡΠΌΠΏΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Π² ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ.Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ. Π ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° Π²ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ², ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΡΠΈΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ, Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΡΠ΅ Π΄ΠΈΡΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠ΅ (ΠΎΡ
Π²Π°Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΡΠ°Π·ΠΌΠ΅Ρ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Π½Π° Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅, ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡ Π² ΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΠ΅, ΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ»ΡΠ³, Π΄ΠΎΠ±ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ°Ρ
ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ) ΠΈ Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΡ (ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΡΠΎΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΡΠ»ΡΠ³ Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ, Π΄ΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΈ Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅, Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ°, ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ).ΠΠ°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠΡΠΈΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π·Π°Π΄Π°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Π² ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΡΡ
ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π°Ρ
Π½Π° ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π½Ρ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡΡΡ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΎΡΠ²ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ±ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π±ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Ρ. ΠΠ°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΡΠΌ Π΄ΠΈΡΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠΌ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΌ, ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΡΡΠΈΠΌ Π΄ΠΎΠ»Ρ ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·ΠΌΠ΅Ρ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ², ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π³Π°ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ Π±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠΈ, Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠΌ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΌ β Π΄ΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΈ Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅
ΠΠ±Π·ΠΎΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠΈΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π€Π΅Π΄Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ
The article presents a review of current and alternative methods for planning the scope and financing of medical care in the subjects of the Russian Federation. The relevance of the issue is due to the imperfection of the current planning model, which stimulate representatives of the profile bodies and independent experts to develop alternative methods. The current approaches and legal documents regulating the procedure for distributing the scope of medical care and financial resources to pay for this care are discribed. The analysis of alternative methods shows how different demographic and infrastructural features of regions can be used to redistribute the scope of medical care and the corresponding financial support.Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ ΠΎΠ±Π·ΠΎΡ Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΈ Π°Π»ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΡΠΈΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠΈ Π² ΡΡΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ°Ρ
Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π€Π΅Π΄Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ. ΠΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π° Π½Π΅ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠΌ Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, ΡΡΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡΡ ΡΡΠΈΠΌΡΠ»ΠΎΠΌ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΎΠ² ΠΈ Π½Π΅Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΡΡ
ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ² ΠΊ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ΅ Π°Π»ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊ. ΠΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½Ρ Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΈ Π½ΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡ, ΡΠ΅Π³Π»Π°ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΊ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠΈΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ² Π½Π° ΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠΈ. ΠΠ½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· Π°Π»ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²Π°Π΅Ρ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ² Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ Π΅ΠΌΡ ΡΠΈΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΠ½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· Π·Π°ΡΡΠ±Π΅ΠΆΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΉ
Objevtive: to identify and systematize the main approaches to planning health care provider network used in foreign countries.Material and methods. Preliminary search for countries who had an experience of systematical planning of health care provider network and tools that they used for planning was conducted in regular health system reviews made by the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Identified tools became a subject of general Internet search for the official publications about goals, mechanisms and results of their usage. The findings were analysed to reveal the similarities and differences between national health care provider network planning policies as well as the objective preconditions for the formation of such policies.Results. Three main approaches to health care provider network planning were identified in the analysis: (1) through establishing state-owned health care providers, (2) through granting the right to deliver guaranteed health care or (3) through granting the right to deliver health care of all categories. A close relationship between the choice of prevailing approach to planning and specific planning tools and the national health care model and structure of health services supply was shown. The typical policy of countries most similar to Russia on these parameters (βyoungβ insurance systems, operating under conditions of predominant state supply of medical services) is the protection of key providers on the basis of minimum activity or income guarantees with the gradual development of a competitive health care market based on the rest of the Compulsory Health Insurance program.Conclusion. Current Russian health care provider network planning regulation based on the direct control over the state-owned health care providers does not correspond to the changed health care model and does not allow taking full advantages of the social health insurance. The results of the review can be used to develop new tools for planning health care provider network spanning on non-state providers.Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ: ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΊ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΉ (ΠΠ), ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΡ
Π·Π°ΡΡΠ±Π΅ΠΆΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π°ΠΌΠΈ.ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π» ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ. ΠΠ° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ±Π·ΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π±ΡΡΠΎ ΠΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π²ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Ρ, ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΡΡ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈ ΠΠ, ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡ. ΠΠ»Ρ ΠΎΠ±Π½Π°ΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π΅Ρ-ΠΏΠΎΠΈΡΠΊ ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ, ΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°ΡΠΈΡ
ΡΠ°Π·Π²Π΅ΡΠ½ΡΡΡΠ΅ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡ
, ΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ°Ρ
ΠΈΡ
ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ Π² ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡ
Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠΈΡ
ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΡ ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΠ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π²Π½Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠΊ, Π²Π»ΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΡ
Π½Π° ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊ.Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ. ΠΠ½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΡΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ» Π²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΡ ΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΊ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈ ΠΠ: 1) ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π· ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΠ; 2) ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π· ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎΠΏΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΊ ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π³Π°ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠΈ (ΠΠ); 3) ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π· ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎΠΏΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΊ ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π΄Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π²ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅. ΠΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°Π΄Π°ΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½ Ρ ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠΌ Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π³Π°ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΠ. ΠΠ»Ρ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½, Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π±Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΊ Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΠΌ (Β«ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡ
Β» ΡΡΡΠ°Ρ
ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ, Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
Π² ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΈΠΌΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ»ΡΠ³), ΡΠΈΠΏΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π·Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ° ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ Π³Π°ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ° Π΄Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Π° Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΊΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΠ° ΠΠ Π½Π° Π±Π°Π·Π΅ ΠΎΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ°Ρ
ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ.ΠΠ°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. Π’Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠ°Ρ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈ ΠΠ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΠΏΡΡΠΌΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΌ Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π΅ ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΉΡΡ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π³Π°ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΠ ΠΈ Π½Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ΅Ρ Π² ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅ Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΈΠΌΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ°Ρ
ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ. Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΎΠ±Π·ΠΎΡΠ° ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡ Π±ΡΡΡ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈ, Π² Ρ.Ρ. ΠΎΡ
Π²Π°ΡΡΠ²Π°ΡΡΠΈΡ
Π½Π΅Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΠ
ΠΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠΈ
Methods of payment to care providers constitute an essential part of the healthcare financing system; these mechanisms determine the motivation of service providers. Throughout the history of public health care, the payment methods have been gradually improved so to stimulate the providers to best match the societal demands (greater access to health services, cost reduction, and better quality) and prevent βmoral hazardsβ. As a result, the most advanced healthcare systems have stopped paying simply for service volume and rigorously restraining the costs. Instead, the updated system is based on the integrated payments combining the elements of cost control with the stimuli that promote a high quality and better access to healthcare service. At present, the new payment mechanisms aiming at improving the long-term treatment outcomes (life expectancy and quality of life) are available. The care provider payment system existing in Russia, by large, corresponds to the best international practices as far as the hospital care is concerned. However, the payment arrangements in the primary care network still lag behind the international standards. To improve the situation, quality indicators should be included in payments for primary care services.ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠΉ Π²Π°ΠΆΠ½ΡΠΉ ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΡΠΈΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΡΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΌΠΎΡΠΈΠ²Ρ Π΄Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² ΡΡΠ»ΡΠ³. ΠΠ° Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡ Π½Π΅ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π½ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ Π² ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡ
ΡΡΠΈΠΌΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠΌ (ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΠ°, ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ², ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° ΡΡΠ»ΡΠ³), ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ±ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ². Π ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΡΡ ΠΎΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΈ ΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π·Π°ΡΡΠ°Ρ ΠΊ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΠΌ ΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡ, ΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»Ρ ΡΠ°ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΡΠΎ ΡΡΠΈΠΌΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ². Π Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΌΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ Π² ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΡΡ
ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π°Ρ
ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±Π°ΡΡΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡ, Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΌΠΎΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΊ ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠ΄Π°Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ (ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°). ΠΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ° ΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡ Π³Π°ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠΈ ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²ΡΠ΅Ρ Π»ΡΡΡΠΈΠΌ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΌ Π² ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠΈ, Π½ΠΎ ΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π΅Ρ Π² ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π²Π΅Π½Π°. ΠΡΠΈΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π·Π°Π΄Π°ΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π²Π½Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡ Π°ΠΌΠ±ΡΠ»Π°ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π°
ΠΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ° ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Π½Π° Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΈ
Life expectancy to healthcare spending ratio differs significantly among the Russian regions. The differences could be explained with both non-discretionary factors and the regional management efficiency. The main aim of this article is to evaluate the efficiency of the regional healthcare in Russia employing the formal methodological approach. We use three-step data envelopment analysis (DEA) in order to (1) calculate the technical efficiency scores for regional healthcare systems, (2) determine non-discretionary factors affecting the scores and (3) exclude the non-discretionary component from scores to asses the management efficiency. Using data for 76 Russian regions in 2006-2013 we found approx. 27% regional healthcare spending inefficient, which equals to real 269-435 billion rubles of inefficient spending annually.Β Π‘ΠΎΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ΄Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠΈΜ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½ΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Π½Π° Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ ΡΡΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΡΠ½ΡΡΡΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π΄Π΅ΠΈΜΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π²Π½Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ², ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ Π² ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ. Π¦Π΅Π»ΡΡ Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ° ΠΈ Π°ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΊ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΈΜ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ΅ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Π½Π° Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΈ. ΠΠ»Ρ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΈΜ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ Π±ΡΠ» ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ ΡΡΠ΅Ρ
ΡΡΡΠΏΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΜ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Ρ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠΈΜ Π² ΡΠ΅Π±Ρ: 1) ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΡ ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈΜ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈ Π·Π°ΡΡΠ°Ρ Π² Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ; 2) ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ Π²Π½Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ²; 3) ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΈΜ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π±Π΅Π· ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ° Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ Π²Π½Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ², ΡΠΎ Π΅ΡΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠΈΜ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠΌ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠ»Ρ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎ 76 ΡΡΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ°ΠΌ Π Π€ Π·Π° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄ 2006-2013 Π³Π³. Π ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ Π² ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Π½Π΅ΠΌ ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎ 27% ΡΠ°ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Π½Π° Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² ΡΡΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ°Ρ
Π Π€ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡΡΡ Π½Π΅ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ. ΠΠ±ΡΠ°Ρ Π²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Π° Π½Π΅ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Π² 76 ΡΡΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ°Ρ
Π·Π° ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΠΌΡΠΈΜ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄ ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅Π±Π°Π»Π°ΡΡ Π² ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Π²ΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΡ 269 Π΄ΠΎ 435 ΠΌΠ»ΡΠ΄ ΡΡΠ±. Π² Π³ΠΎΠ΄ Π² ΡΠ΅Π½Π°Ρ
2013 Π³.
ΠΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΎΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ
This article contains the aims and main principles of the concept of value-based healthcare (VBHC). The relevance of the implementation of this approach into the Russian healthcare system results from the fact that during the control and payment for medical care, the treatment outcomes are evaluated selectively and at separate stages. The medical care payment system considers only its volumes and not achieving the desired treatment outcome significant to a patient. A review of the worldβs best practices of introducing VBHC conception and, also new medical care payment methods such as bundled payment and pay-for-performance (P4P) has been conducted. According to international experience, VBHC increases the quality of medical care and provides the optimization of costs. To implement VBHC model in the Russian Federation, it is necessary to ensure the informatization of the providing medical care, development, and improvement of medical quality control systems (development of the resulting criteria for medical care quality for all diseases), and introduction of the rating system for medical organizations. Provided these processes are ensured, further progressing to P4P is possible. Moreover, it would also be feasible to implement VBHC in other healthcare processes including procurement of drugs and medical devices, their pricing, and reimbursement.Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½Ρ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΎΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ (Π¦ΠΠ). ΠΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π²Π½Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Π° Π² ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π Π€ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π° ΡΠ΅ΠΌ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»Π΅ ΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ° ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ°ΠΏΠ°Ρ
. Π‘ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ° ΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠΈ ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠ²Π°Π΅Ρ Π»ΠΈΡΡ Π΅Π΅ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ, Π° Π½Π΅ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ° Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ ΠΎΠ±Π·ΠΎΡ Π·Π°ΡΡΠ±Π΅ΠΆΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΡΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎ Π²Π½Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΠΈ Π¦ΠΠ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠΈ, ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Β«ΠΏΠ°ΠΊΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠΈΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅Β» ΠΈ Β«ΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΠ° Π·Π° ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΒ». Π‘ΠΎΠ³Π»Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΎΠΏΡΡΡ, Π²Π½Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΎΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠΈΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΡΠ°ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Ρ. ΠΠ»Ρ ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Π° Π² Π Π€ Π½Π° ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΎΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Ρ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°, ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»Ρ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠΈ (ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ° ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ΅Π² ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠΈ Π΄Π»Ρ Π²ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ) ΠΈ Π²Π½Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΉΡΠΈΠ½Π³ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΉ. ΠΡΠΈ ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΈ Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ Π΄Π°Π»ΡΠ½Π΅ΠΉΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ Π½Π° P4P ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠΈ. Π¦Π΅Π»Π΅ΡΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΠΎ Π²Π½Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ² Π¦ΠΠ ΠΈ Π² Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π² Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ, Π² ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π² Π·Π°ΠΊΡΠΏΠΊΡ Π»Π΅ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈΠ·Π΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΠΉ, Π² ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠΎΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ
FACTORS AND EFFECTS OF PRIVATE HEALTH SPENDING
Private health spending in modern developed countries varies considerably depending on the national policy objectives, selected regulatory instruments as well as general socio-economic conditions.The objective of this paper is to analyze key determinants of private health spending.Materials and Methods. To achieve this objective we analyze academic works dealing with theoretical and empirical studies of private health spending.Results. From the analysis the effects of private health spending determining national health financing policy, significant discretionary (breadth and depth of social healthcare system, public health expenditure, regulatory measures on cost sharing, paid medical services, voluntary health insurance) and non-discretionary factors (relative health services price, income and its distribution, age structure, level of education, political preferences) were highlighted.Conclusion. In developed countries priorities of health private spending regulatory policy now are ensuring accessibility of essential health care and preventing consumerβs moral hazard. The most significant discretionary factor influencing the share and amount of private health spending is the management of state guarantees of free medical care; the most significant non-discretionary factor is the income and its distribution
Evolution of healthcare provider payment mechanisms
Methods of payment to care providers constitute an essential part of the healthcare financing system; these mechanisms determine the motivation of service providers. Throughout the history of public health care, the payment methods have been gradually improved so to stimulate the providers to best match the societal demands (greater access to health services, cost reduction, and better quality) and prevent βmoral hazardsβ. As a result, the most advanced healthcare systems have stopped paying simply for service volume and rigorously restraining the costs. Instead, the updated system is based on the integrated payments combining the elements of cost control with the stimuli that promote a high quality and better access to healthcare service. At present, the new payment mechanisms aiming at improving the long-term treatment outcomes (life expectancy and quality of life) are available. The care provider payment system existing in Russia, by large, corresponds to the best international practices as far as the hospital care is concerned. However, the payment arrangements in the primary care network still lag behind the international standards. To improve the situation, quality indicators should be included in payments for primary care services
HEALTHCARE SPENDING EFFICIENCY IN RUSSIAN REGIONS
Life expectancy to healthcare spending ratio differs significantly among the Russian regions. The differences could be explained with both non-discretionary factors and the regional management efficiency. The main aim of this article is to evaluate the efficiency of the regional healthcare in Russia employing the formal methodological approach. We use three-step data envelopment analysis (DEA) in order to (1) calculate the technical efficiency scores for regional healthcare systems, (2) determine non-discretionary factors affecting the scores and (3) exclude the non-discretionary component from scores to asses the management efficiency. Using data for 76 Russian regions in 2006-2013 we found approx. 27% regional healthcare spending inefficient, which equals to real 269-435 billion rubles of inefficient spending annually