27 research outputs found
Numerical Modeling of the Anthropogenic Dust Transfer by Means of Quasistatic and Non-Quasistatic Models
Kinematics of the anthropogenic dust propagation emitted into the atmosphere by big cities and separate sources using numerical integration of the system of three-dimensional non-linear quasistatic and non-static equations of atmosphere hydrothermodinamics and equation of dust transfer-diffusion in the atmosphere are studied. It is obtained through modeling that kinematics of a dust propagation obtained by quazistatic and non-static equations have both common and different features. In case of beta- mesoscale diffusion, which is described by means of quazistatic equations, advective diffusion plays the key role in the dust transfer process of. In case of gamma- mesoscale diffusion, which is described by means of non-static equations, the major role in the process of dust transfer, is played by convective diffusion
Numerical Modeling of PM2.5 Propagation in Tbilisi Atmosphere in Winter. I. A Case of Background North Light Wind
PM2.5 propagation at Tbilisi territory in winter period in case of background north light wind is numerically modeled and analyzed through combined integration of 3D regional model of atmospheric processes evolution and equation of admixtures transfer-diffusion. Motor transport moving at city streets and trunk lines is a main source of atmosphere pollution. There are investigated the main peculiarities, which characterize the process of microaerosols spatial distribution under rugged terrain conditions. PM2.5 high concentration zones are established at the territory of city, time intervals, when high air pollution forms or air self-purification takes place, are determined. Temporal and spatial variations of PM2.5 concentration in the lower part of atmospheric boundary layer are studied. It is established that 25 mkg/m3 and higher concentration is obtained from 11AM to 1PM and from 7PM to 10PM in the surroundings of Ponichala situated in the eastern part of the city
Evaluation of the content of microparticles in the atmosphere of Rustavi by experimental measurements
áá¥á¡ááá ááááá¢á£áá áááááááááá¡á áá ááááá¢áá ááááá¡ áááááªáááááá ááá§á áááááá ááááááááá£ááá á¥. á á£á¡ááááá¡ áá¢ááá¡á€áá á£á á°ááá ášá áááááá£áá áááá áááá¬áááááááá¡ PM2.5 áá PM10 ááááªááá¢á ááªáááá. ášáá€áá¡ááá£ááá á¥áááá¥áá¡ áá¢ááá¡á€áá áá¡ áááááá«á£á áááá¡ áááááá á¢á áá¡áááá ááá«á ááá ááá¢áá¢á ááá¡ááá á¢áá¡ ááááááá. ááá ááááá áááááá£á á áááá áá¢áá¡ ááááá§áááááá áá¥á¡ááá ááááá¢á£ááá áááá¡áááŠáá á£ááá á¥áááá¥ášá áá ááá¡ ášáááááá ááášá áá¢ááá¡á€áá áášá áááááá£áá áááá áááá¬áááááááá¡ ááááªááá¢á ááªáááá. áááááááááááá ááá¥á¡ááááá£á á áááááá«á£á áááá¡ á£ááááá.The study showed, that in the atmosphere of the Rustavi city, the concentrations of PM2.5 are usually lower than the concentrations of PM10, but the character of their change curve in the atmosphere of the city is almost always the same.
The maximum values of the concentrations of the studied micro particles almost always exceed the values of the corresponding maximum allowable concentration.
The trend of hourly change of PM-particles concentrations in Rustavi differs from the results obtained in Tbilisi, since the content of micro particles in the atmosphere of the city of Rustavi is affected not only by the traffic intensity, but also by the mode of operation of industrial enterprises. As a result, their maximum content in the atmosphere of the city of Rustavi is observed in any interval of the day. Experimental measurements have shown that the tendency to increase the content of PM-particles in the atmosphere of the city of Rustavi determines both the flow of vehicles and emissions from industrial enterprises and meteorological conditions
ÐПлОÑеÑÑÐ²ÐµÐœÐœÐ°Ñ ÐŸÑеМка паÑМОкПвÑÑ Ð³Ð°Ð·ÐŸÐ² ÑЌОÑÑОÑПваММÑÑ Ð² аÑЌПÑÑеÑÑ ÑП ÑвалПк ÑвÑÑÐŽÑÑ Ð±ÑÑПвÑÑ ÐŸÑÑ ÐŸÐŽÐŸÐ² г. ТбОлОÑО
áááááá¡áá¡ (á.á¡.á.) ááááááááááááá ááááá ááá£áá áá ááªáá¡áááá¡ áááá á¬áá ááá¥ááááá ááááááá, ááᣠáááááá¡áá§á áááá¡ áááá (á.á.) áá¢ááá¡á€áá áášá áááááá€á á¥áááá áááá á ááááááááá. áá¡ áááá áááá á ááááááááá ášáááªááá¡ á¡áááá£á áá¡ ááá ááá¡ áááááá¡, ááá®ášáá ááááá¡ áááá¥á¡ááá¡, ááá áááá áááá áááááááááá¢ááá¡ áááá¢á¡, áááááááá¡, á¬á§áááááá¡, áááá áááááá ááááá¡ ááááá ááá¡ áááá¥á¡ááá¡, ááááá áá¬á§áááááá¡. ášáá¡á¬ááááááá áá¥á¡ááá ááááá¢á£ááá áá¢ááá¡á€áá áášá áááá¢áá ááá£áá áááááá¡áá§á áááá¡ ááááá¡ ášááááááááááá áá á áááááááá ášáááá ááá£ááá áááá áá£ááá áááááááááá áááááá¡áá§á áááá¡ ááááá¡ á ááááááááá¡ááá.Biogas or landfill gas at Tbilisi SRWDS-es is emitted into the atmosphere in large quantities. This gas contains GHGs- methane, carbon dioxide and microcomponents - nitrogen, oxygen, hydrogen and small admixtures - sulfur dioxide, hydrogen sulfide. The composition and quantity of emitted landfill gas is examined experimentally and the quantity is compared with the amount calculated theoretically.ÐОПгаз ОлО ÑвалПÑÐœÑй газ, вПзМОкаÑÑОй в ÑезÑлÑÑаÑе аМаÑÑПбМÑÑ
пÑПÑеÑÑПв, в бПлÑÑПЌ кПлОÑеÑÑве ÑЌОÑÑОÑÑеÑÑÑ ÑП ÑвалПк ÑвÑÑÐŽÑÑ
бÑÑПвÑÑ
ПÑÑ
ПЎПв г. ТбОлОÑО. ÐÑÐŸÑ Ð³Ð°Ð· ÑПЎеÑÐ¶ÐžÑ ÐŒÐµÑаМ О ЎвÑПкОÑÑ ÑглеÑПЎа, а Ñакже ЌОкÑПкПЌпПМеМÑÑ â азПÑ, кОÑлПÑПЎ, вПЎПÑПЎ О ЌОкÑПпÑОЌеÑО â ЎОПкÑОЎ ÑеÑÑ Ðž ÑеÑПвПЎПÑПЎ. ÐкÑпеÑОЌеМÑалÑМП ОÑÑÐ»ÐµÐŽÐŸÐ²Ð°ÐœÑ ÑПÑÑав О кПлОÑеÑÑвП ÑЌОÑÑОÑПваММПгП в аÑЌПÑÑеÑÑ ÑвалПÑМПгП газа О кПлОÑеÑÑвП ÑПпПÑÑавлеМП Ñ ÑеПÑеÑОÑеÑкО ÑаÑÑОÑаММÑÐŒ кПлОÑеÑÑвПЌ ÑвалПÑМПгП газа
ÐпÑÑ Ð¿ÑÐžÐŒÐµÐœÐµÐœÐžÑ ÐŒÐŸÐŽÐµÐ»Ðž ОМÑегÑОÑПваММПгП ÑпÑÐ°Ð²Ð»ÐµÐœÐžÑ Ð²ÐŸÐŽÐœÑЌО ÑеÑÑÑÑаЌО WEAP 21 в баÑÑейМе Ñ. СакÑаЌеМÑП
ááá§ááááááá á¡á¢ááá°ááááá¡ ááá áááá¡áááªáááá ááá¡á¢áá¢á£á¢áá¡ ááá¡á¢áááá¡ á€áááááášá áááá£ášááááá£áá WEAP 21 á¬á§ááá¡ ááá¢ááá áááá£áá ááá áááá¡ ááááááá¡ ááááá§áááááá¡ ášááááááá áá. á¡ááá ááááá¢áá¡ áá á áá áááááááá¡ ááááá¯áááá áááááá áá¡ á¥áááá£áášá ááááá áá¢á£áá ááááªááááá¡ ááááá¡ááá áááá. áááá®áá£ááá á¥áááá£ááááá¡ á€ááááá£á -ááááá áá€áá£áá ááá®áá¡áááááááá ááá ášáá áá¡ ááá¡á£áá ááááá¥áááá¡á áá á©áááááááááá¡ áááá£ááá¡ ášáááá¬ááá£á á ááááá¬ááááá. áá.Battle Creek-áá¡ á¥áááá£áášá ááááá¥áá ááááá¬áááááá¡ ášáááá áááá áááááá áá¡ á¡áášá£ááá áááá£á á®áá á¯ááááá áááááááááá ááá¡á ááá¬áá¡á¥ááášá áááááá¡ áá á¡ááááá á ááá á©áááááááááá¡ á€áá ááá áááášá. áá.Cow Creek-áá¡ á¥áááá£áášá á¡áá«ááá áááá¡ á¡áá á¬á§áááá áááááá áá¡ á¬á§ááá¡ ááááá§áááááá¡ ááááááá áááá áá©áááá, á áá áá áŠáááá¡á«ááááá¡ ášáááááá á¬á§ááášáááá áááááá á¢áááá¡ á¡áášá£ááá á¬ááá£á á ááááááá áá ááá áááá 6%-áá, á á᪠áá¬-áááá¡ ááá¡ ášáá¡áá áááááá á©áááááááááá¡ ášáááªáá áááá¡ 3%-áá áá ááá¬áá¡á¥ááášá á¬á§ááá¡ ááááá¡ áááªáááá¡ 0.6 ááá¢á áá. áá.Battle Creek-áá¡ á¥áááá£áášá áá ááá£ááá¡ áááá£áááªááá¡ ášáá¡áááá á©á£ááááá á¡áááá á á¢ááááá áá¢á£á á£áá á áááááá¡ ááá¡ááªáááá ááááááá áááá áá©áááá áááááá ááá áá á¡ááá£áá á°ááá áá¢áá¥áá£á á ááááááááááá¡ á ááááá¡á¢á á£á¥áªááá¡ áá£áªáááááááá, á á᪠ááá á®áá á¯ááááá áá¥áááá áááááášáá ááá£áá. ááááááá áááá¡ áááááªáááááá ášááá«áááá ááááá§ááááá£áá áá¥ááá¡ á¡áá¥áá áááááá¡ áááááá ááá áªááááá£á áá£áááášá á¬á§ááá¡ á áá¡á£á á¡áááá¡ ááá¢ááá áá ááá£áá ááá áááá¡ á¡áááááááá áá áá¥á¢áááášáFollowing the paper published in Water International (2005), the results are given on the application of WEAP 21 Integrated Water Resource Management model to resolve specific problems in two neighboring sub-catchments of R. Sacramento. The features of physical geography of selected areas are reviewed including inter annual distribution of precipitation and the unit runoff. The comparison between precipitation monthly averages in the Battle Creek sub-catchment and mean discharges of the river has revealed essential role of groundwater feeding in retaining the river runoff. The modeling of pasture irrigation in the basin of Cow Creek has demonstrated the increased watershedâs annual evaporative loss by 6%, resulting in 3 percent decline in the average flow volume downstream at the confluence and 0.6 meter drop in the mean groundwater elevation. The modeling of conditions required to maintain temperature regime necessary for the preservation of salmon population in the basin of Battle Creek has revealed the need of essential reconstruction of existing hydrotechnical infrastructure related with vast expenses. The modeling experience could be used in the future practice of integrated water management in the basins of separate rivers in Georgia.ÐÑеЎÑÑÐ°Ð²Ð»ÐµÐœÑ ÑезÑлÑÑаÑÑ Ð¿ÑÐžÐŒÐµÐœÐµÐœÐžÑ ÐŒÐŸÐŽÐµÐ»Ðž ОМÑегÑОÑПваММПгП ÑпÑÐ°Ð²Ð»ÐµÐœÐžÑ Ð²ÐŸÐŽÐœÑЌО ÑеÑÑÑÑаЌО WEAP 21 ÐŽÐ»Ñ ÑеÑÐµÐœÐžÑ ÐºÐŸÐœÐºÑеÑÐœÑÑ
Ð·Ð°ÐŽÐ°Ñ Ð² вПЎПÑбПÑаÑ
ЎвÑÑ
ÑПÑеЎМОÑ
Ñек баÑÑейМа Ñ.СакÑаЌеМÑП (ÐалОÑПÑМОÑ). РаÑÑЌПÑÑÐµÐœÑ ÑОзОкП- геПгÑаÑОÑеÑкОе Ñ
аÑакÑеÑОÑÑОкО вПЎПÑбПÑПв, вклÑÑÐ°Ñ Ð²ÐœÑÑÑОгПЎПвПе ÑаÑпÑеЎелеМОе вÑпаЎаÑÑОÑ
ПÑаЎкПв О ЌПЎÑÐ»Ñ ÑÑПка. СПпПÑÑавлеМОе гПЎПвПгП Ñ
ПЎа ÑÑеЎМОÑ
ЌеÑÑÑÐœÑÑ
ÑÑЌЌ ПÑаЎкПв в вПЎПÑбПÑе Ñ.Battle Creek Ñ Ñ
ПЎПЌ ЌеÑÑÑÐœÑÑ
ÑаÑÑ
ПЎПв ÑекО вÑÑвОлП ÑÑÑеÑÑвеММÑÑ ÑÐŸÐ»Ñ Ð¿ÐŸÐŽÐ·ÐµÐŒÐœÐŸÐ³ÐŸ ÑÑПка в ÑПÑ
ÑаМеМОО ПбÑегП пОÑÐ°ÐœÐžÑ ÑекО. ÐПЎелОÑПваМОе пПлОва паÑÑÐ±ÐžÑ Ð² вПЎПÑбПÑе Ñ.Cow Creek пПказалП, ÑÑП в ÑезÑлÑÑаÑе ÑÑПгП ЌеÑПпÑОÑÑÐžÑ ÑÑеЎМОе гПЎПвÑе пПÑеÑО влагО Ñ Ð²ÐŸÐŽÐŸÑбПÑа ÑвелОÑОваеÑÑÑ ÐœÐ° 6%, пÑÐžÐ²ÐŸÐŽÑ Ðº ÑЌеМÑÑÐµÐœÐžÑ ÑÑПка ÑекО в ÑÑÑÑе Ма 3% О Ð¿Ð°ÐŽÐµÐœÐžÑ ÑÑÐŸÐ²ÐœÑ Ð¿ÐŸÐŽÐ·ÐµÐŒÐœÑÑ
вПЎ Ма 0,6 ÐŒ. ÐПЎелОÑПваМОе ÑÑлПвОй ПбеÑпеÑÐµÐœÐžÑ ÑеЌпеÑаÑÑÑМПгП ÑежОЌа, ÑÑебÑеЌПгП ÐŽÐ»Ñ ÑПÑ
ÑÐ°ÐœÐµÐœÐžÑ Ð¿ÐŸÐ¿ÑлÑÑОО лПÑПÑÑ Ð² Ñ.Battle Creek пПказалП МеПбÑ
ПЎОЌПÑÑÑ ÑÑÑеÑÑвеММПй ÑекПМÑÑÑÑкÑОО кПЌплекÑа гОЎÑПÑеÑ
МОÑеÑкОÑ
ÑППÑÑжеМОй ÑвÑзаММÑÑ
Ñ Ð±ÐŸÐ»ÑÑОЌО заÑÑаÑаЌО. ÐпÑÑ ÐŒÐŸÐŽÐµÐ»ÐžÑÐŸÐ²Ð°ÐœÐžÑ ÐŒÐŸÐ¶ÐµÑ Ð±ÑÑÑ ÐžÑпПлÑзПваМ в бÑÐŽÑÑеЌ в пÑакÑОке ОМÑегÑОÑПваММПгП ÑпÑÐ°Ð²Ð»ÐµÐœÐžÑ Ð²ÐŸÐŽÐœÑЌО ÑеÑÑÑÑаЌО ПÑЎелÑÐœÑÑ
Ñек ÐÑÑзОО
Investigation of Tbilisi Air Pollution With PM-Particles and Dust
áááá¡áááŠáá á£ááá á¥. áááááá¡áá¡á áá ááá¡á áááááááá á á¢áá áá¢áá ááá¡ áá¢ááá¡á€áá á£á á°ááá ášá PM-ááá¬áááááááá¡á áá áá¢áá áá¡ ááááªááá¢á ááªáááá. ášáá€áá¡ááá£ááá áááá á§áááááááá£á á ááá¥á¡ááááá£á á, áááááááá£á á áá á¡áášá£ááá áááášááááááááá. ááááááá ááá£ááá áá¢áá áá¡ áááá áªáááááá¡ áá ááªáá¡á á€ááá£á á á¡á¢ááªáááááá£á á ááá¡ááááááá¡ á¥áá áá¡ ášáááá®ááááášá. áááááá«á£á áááá¡ á¬á§áá áá¡ á¬áá áááááááá¡ á¥áááá¥ášá á¬áá ááá¥ááááá áá¢ááá á. áááŠááá£ááá áááá£ááá£á á á¡á£á ááááá áá¢áá áá¡ áááá áªáááááá¡ áá ááááá¡á áá ááááªááá¢á ááªááááá¡ ášáá¡áá®á
Change of Heavy Metal Concentration in Surface Waters and Soils of East Georgia Considering the Anthropogenic Impact
ášáá¡á¬ááááááá ááŠááá¡ááááá á¡áá¥áá áááááá¡ ááááááá á£á á¬á§áááá¡á áá ááááááááášá áá«ááá ááááááááá¡ ášáááªááááááá¡ áªáááááááááá ááá ááááá áááá ááááááá£áá ááá¢ááá áááá¡ áááááááá¡á¬áááááá 2017-2019 á¬á¬. á§á£á áááŠááá ááááá®áááááá£ááá áá¡áá ááááááááá, á áááá ááªáá á¡áááááá«á, á¢á§ááá áá ááá áªá®áá. ááá©ááááááá, á áá ááŠááá¡ááááá á¡áá¥áá áááááá¡ ááááááááášá áá«ááá ááááááááááá áá ááá áá¢áá¢á£áá áááááááá«á£á ááááá ááááááá¢áá á¡áááááá«á, ášááááá á¢á§ááá, á®ááá ááá áªá®ááá¡ ááááªááá¢á ááªáááá á£áááášáááááá. á á᪠ášááá®ááá áá«ááá ááááááááá¡ ášáááªááááááá¡ á¬á§ááá¡ááªáááááá¡ á¬á§áááášá, áá¡ááá ááá ááá¡ á€áá ááááášáá áá áááááá«á£á áááá¡ áááááá áá áá¥áá¡.The concentrations of heavy metals (copper, lead and silver) in the surface waters and soils of eastern Georgia were studied taking into account anthropogenic impact for the period 2017-2019. It is shown, that the priority soil contaminant in eastern Georgia is copper, followed by lead, and silver concentrations are not significant. As for the content of heavy metals in the waters of water bodies, it is within the normal range and does not cause pollution