7 research outputs found
Manganese- and Lanthanide-Based 1D Chiral Coordination Polymers as an Enantioselective Catalyst for Sulfoxidation
The chiral 1D-coordination
polymers (CP) {[Ln<sub>2</sub>Â(MnLCl)<sub>2</sub>Â(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Â(dmf)<sub>6</sub>Â(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>]·<i>x</i>H<sub>2</sub>O}<sub><i>n</i></sub> [Ln = Pr (<b>1</b>), Nd (<b>2</b>), Sm (<b>3</b>), and Gd (<b>4</b>)] were synthesized
by the reaction of <i>N,N</i>′-bisÂ(4-carboxyÂsalicylidene)ÂcycloÂhexaneÂdiÂamine
(H<sub>4</sub>L) with [MnCl<sub>2</sub>·4Â(H<sub>2</sub>O)] and
[LnÂ(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>·<i>x</i>(H<sub>2</sub>O)] in the presence of dmf/pyridine at 90 °C. The polymers consist
of manganese-salen-based moieties having carboxylate linkers connected
to rare earth atoms in a 1D-chain structure. The polymers are very
easily accessible. A one-step synthesis for the ligand and a second
step for the preparation of the 1D coordination polymers starting
from commercially available material are needed. The solid state structures
of <b>1</b>–<b>4</b> were established by single-crystal
X-ray diffraction. Compounds <b>1</b>–<b>4</b> were
investigated as heterogeneous catalysts for the sulfoxidation reaction
of various alkyl and aryl sulfides. The influence of various solvents
and oxidizing agents on the catalytic reaction was examined. It was
found that the catalysts were active for more than one reaction cycle
without significant loss of activity. For phenylsulfide with 1 mol
% of the catalyst <b>4</b>, a maximum conversion 100% and a
chemoselectivity 88% were observed
Origin of Ferromagnetic Exchange Coupling in Donor–Acceptor Biradical Analogues of Charge-Separated Excited States
A new donor–acceptor biradical complex, TpCum,MeZn(SQ-VD) (TpCum,MeZn+ = zinc(II)
hydro-tris(3-cumenyl-5-methylpyrazolyl)borate
complex cation; SQ = orthosemiquinone; VD = oxoverdazyl), which is
a ground-state analogue of a charge-separated excited state, has been
synthesized and structurally characterized. The magnetic exchange
interaction between the S = 1/2 SQ and the S = 1/2 VD within the SQ-VD biradical ligand is observed
to be ferromagnetic, with JSQ‑VD = +77 cm–1 (H = −2JSQ‑VDŜSQ·ŜVD) determined from an analysis of the variable-temperature
magnetic susceptibility data. The pairwise biradical exchange interaction
in TpCum,MeZn(SQ-VD) can be compared with that of the related
donor–acceptor biradical complex TpCum,MeZn(SQ-NN)
(NN = nitronyl nitroxide, S = 1/2), where JSQ‑NN ≅ +550 cm–1. This represents a dramatic
reduction in the biradical exchange by a factor of ∼7, despite
the isolobal nature of the VD and NN acceptor radical SOMOs. Computations
assessing the magnitude of the exchange were performed using a broken-symmetry
density functional theory (DFT) approach. These computations are in
good agreement with those computed at the CASSCF NEVPT2 level, which
also reveals an S = 1 triplet ground state as observed
in the magnetic susceptibility measurements. A combination of electronic
absorption spectroscopy and CASSCF computations has been used to elucidate
the electronic origin of the large difference in the magnitude of
the biradical exchange coupling between TpCum,MeZn(SQ-VD)
and TpCum,MeZn(SQ-NN). A Valence Bond Configuration Interaction
(VBCI) model was previously employed to highlight the importance of
mixing an SQSOMO → NNLUMO charge transfer
configuration into the electronic ground state to facilitate the stabilization
of the high-spin triplet (S = 1) ground state in
TpCum,MeZn(SQ-NN). Here, CASSCF computations confirm the
importance of mixing the pendant radical (e.g., VD, NN) LUMO (VDLUMO and NNLUMO) with the SOMO of the SQ radical
(SQSOMO) for stabilizing the triplet, in addition to spin
polarization and charge transfer contributions to the exchange. An
important electronic structure difference between TpCum,MeZn(SQ-VD) and TpCum,MeZn(SQ-NN), which leads to their
different exchange couplings, is the reduced admixture of excited
states that promote ferromagnetic exchange into the TpCum,MeZn(SQ-VD) ground state, and the intrinsically weaker mixing between
the VDLUMO and the SQSOMO compared to that observed
for TpCum,MeZn(SQ-NN), where this orbital mixing is significant.
The results of this comparative study contribute to a greater understanding
of biradical exchange interactions, which are important to our understanding
of excited-state singlet–triplet energy gaps, electron delocalization,
and the generation of electron spin polarization in both the ground
and excited states of (bpy)Pt(CAT-radical) complexes
Tetranuclear and Pentanuclear Compounds of the Rare-Earth Metals: Synthesis and Magnetism
The Schiff-base proligand 4-<i>tert</i>-butyl-2,6-bis-[(2-hydroxy-phenylimino)Âmethyl]Âphenol
(H<sub>3</sub>L) was prepared in situ from 4-<i>tert</i>-butyl-2,6-diformylphenol and 2-aminophenol. The proligand (H<sub>3</sub>L) was used with dibenzoylmethane (DBMH) or acetylacetone
(acacH) with lanthanides giving compounds with varying arrangements
of metal atoms and nuclearities. The tetranuclear compound {[Dy<sub>4</sub>(L)<sub>3</sub>(DBM)<sub>4</sub>]Â[Et<sub>3</sub>NH]} (<b>1</b>) and pentanuclear compound {[Dy<sub>5</sub>(μ<sub>3</sub>-OH)<sub>2</sub>(L)<sub>3</sub>(DBM)<sub>4</sub>(MeOH)<sub>4</sub>]·4Â(MeOH)} (<b>2</b>) were obtained from the ligand
(L)<sup>3–</sup> and dibenzoylmethane. The tetranuclear compounds
{[Dy<sub>4</sub>(μ<sub>4</sub>-OH)Â(L)<sub>2</sub>(acac)<sub>4</sub>(MeOH)<sub>2</sub>(EtOH)Â(H<sub>2</sub>O)]·(NO<sub>3</sub>)·2Â(MeOH)·3Â(EtOH)} (<b>3</b>) and {[Ln<sub>4</sub>(μ<sub>3</sub>-OH)<sub>2</sub>(L)Â(HL)Â(acac)<sub>5</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)] (HNEt<sub>3</sub>)Â(NO<sub>3</sub>)·2Â(Et<sub>2</sub>O)} (Ln = Tb (<b>4</b>), Dy (<b>5</b>), Ho (<b>6</b>), and Tm (<b>7</b>)) resulted when the ligand (L)<sup>3–</sup> was used in the presence of acetylacetone. In the solid state structures,
the tetranuclear compound <b>1</b> adopts a linear arrangement
of metal atoms, while tetranuclear compound <b>3</b> has a square
grid arrangement of metal atoms, and tetranuclear compounds <b>4</b>–<b>7</b> have a seesaw-shaped arrangement of
metal atoms. The composition found from single-crystal X-ray analysis
of compound <b>1</b> and <b>3</b>–<b>7</b> is supported by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS).
The magnetic studies on compounds <b>1</b> suggest the presence
of weak ferromagnetic interactions, whereas compounds <b>2</b>–<b>6</b> exhibit weak antiferromagnetic interactions
between neighboring metal centers. Compounds <b>1</b>,<b> 2</b>, and <b>3</b> also show single-molecule magnet behavior
under an applied dc field
Tetranuclear and Pentanuclear Compounds of the Rare-Earth Metals: Synthesis and Magnetism
The Schiff-base proligand 4-<i>tert</i>-butyl-2,6-bis-[(2-hydroxy-phenylimino)Âmethyl]Âphenol
(H<sub>3</sub>L) was prepared in situ from 4-<i>tert</i>-butyl-2,6-diformylphenol and 2-aminophenol. The proligand (H<sub>3</sub>L) was used with dibenzoylmethane (DBMH) or acetylacetone
(acacH) with lanthanides giving compounds with varying arrangements
of metal atoms and nuclearities. The tetranuclear compound {[Dy<sub>4</sub>(L)<sub>3</sub>(DBM)<sub>4</sub>]Â[Et<sub>3</sub>NH]} (<b>1</b>) and pentanuclear compound {[Dy<sub>5</sub>(μ<sub>3</sub>-OH)<sub>2</sub>(L)<sub>3</sub>(DBM)<sub>4</sub>(MeOH)<sub>4</sub>]·4Â(MeOH)} (<b>2</b>) were obtained from the ligand
(L)<sup>3–</sup> and dibenzoylmethane. The tetranuclear compounds
{[Dy<sub>4</sub>(μ<sub>4</sub>-OH)Â(L)<sub>2</sub>(acac)<sub>4</sub>(MeOH)<sub>2</sub>(EtOH)Â(H<sub>2</sub>O)]·(NO<sub>3</sub>)·2Â(MeOH)·3Â(EtOH)} (<b>3</b>) and {[Ln<sub>4</sub>(μ<sub>3</sub>-OH)<sub>2</sub>(L)Â(HL)Â(acac)<sub>5</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)] (HNEt<sub>3</sub>)Â(NO<sub>3</sub>)·2Â(Et<sub>2</sub>O)} (Ln = Tb (<b>4</b>), Dy (<b>5</b>), Ho (<b>6</b>), and Tm (<b>7</b>)) resulted when the ligand (L)<sup>3–</sup> was used in the presence of acetylacetone. In the solid state structures,
the tetranuclear compound <b>1</b> adopts a linear arrangement
of metal atoms, while tetranuclear compound <b>3</b> has a square
grid arrangement of metal atoms, and tetranuclear compounds <b>4</b>–<b>7</b> have a seesaw-shaped arrangement of
metal atoms. The composition found from single-crystal X-ray analysis
of compound <b>1</b> and <b>3</b>–<b>7</b> is supported by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS).
The magnetic studies on compounds <b>1</b> suggest the presence
of weak ferromagnetic interactions, whereas compounds <b>2</b>–<b>6</b> exhibit weak antiferromagnetic interactions
between neighboring metal centers. Compounds <b>1</b>,<b> 2</b>, and <b>3</b> also show single-molecule magnet behavior
under an applied dc field
Mononuclear and Tetranuclear Compounds of Yttrium and Dysprosium Ligated by a Salicylic Schiff-Base Derivative: Synthesis, Photoluminescence, and Magnetism
The Schiff-base (2-aminoethyl)Âhydroxybenzoic
acid (H<sub>2</sub>L) as a proligand was prepared in situ from 3-formylsalicylic
acid
and ethanolamine (ETA). The mononuclear {[YÂ(HL)<sub>4</sub>]Â[ETAH]·H<sub>2</sub>O} (<b>1</b>) and {[DyÂ(HL)<sub>4</sub>] [ETAH]·3MeOH·H<sub>2</sub>O} (<b>2</b>) and tetranuclear {[Y<sub>4</sub>(HL)<sub>2</sub>(L)<sub>4</sub>(μ<sub>3</sub>-OH)<sub>2</sub>]·4MeOH·4H<sub>2</sub>O} (<b>3</b>), {[Dy<sub>4</sub>(HL)<sub>2</sub>(L)<sub>4</sub>(μ<sub>3</sub>-OH)<sub>2</sub>]·5Â(MeOH)<sub>2</sub>·7H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>4</b>), and {[Dy<sub>4</sub>(HL)<sub>8</sub>(L)<sub>2</sub>]·4MeOH·2H<sub>2</sub>O}Â(<b>5</b>) rare-earth metal complexes of this ligand could be obtained as
single-crystalline materials by the treatment of H<sub>2</sub>L in
the presence of the metal salts [LnÂ(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>·(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub><i>m</i></sub>] (Ln = Y, Dy). In the solid
state, the tetranuclear compounds <b>3</b> and <b>4</b> exhibit butterfly structures, whereas <b>5</b> adopts a rectangular
arrangement. Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry data of the
ionic compounds <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> support single-crystal
X-ray analysis. The yttrium compounds <b>1</b> and <b>3</b> show fluorescence with 11.5% and 13% quantum yield, respectively,
whereas the quantum yield of the dysprosium complex <b>4</b> is low. Magnetic studies on the dysprosium compounds <b>4</b> and <b>5</b> suggest the presence of weak antiferromagnetic
interactions between neighboring metal centers. Compound <b>4</b> shows single-molecule-magnet behavior with two relaxation processes,
one with the effective energy barrier <i>U</i><sub>eff</sub> = 84 K and the preexponential factor τ<sub>0</sub> = 5.1 ×
10<sup>–9</sup> s
Mononuclear and Tetranuclear Compounds of Yttrium and Dysprosium Ligated by a Salicylic Schiff-Base Derivative: Synthesis, Photoluminescence, and Magnetism
The Schiff-base (2-aminoethyl)Âhydroxybenzoic
acid (H<sub>2</sub>L) as a proligand was prepared in situ from 3-formylsalicylic
acid
and ethanolamine (ETA). The mononuclear {[YÂ(HL)<sub>4</sub>]Â[ETAH]·H<sub>2</sub>O} (<b>1</b>) and {[DyÂ(HL)<sub>4</sub>] [ETAH]·3MeOH·H<sub>2</sub>O} (<b>2</b>) and tetranuclear {[Y<sub>4</sub>(HL)<sub>2</sub>(L)<sub>4</sub>(μ<sub>3</sub>-OH)<sub>2</sub>]·4MeOH·4H<sub>2</sub>O} (<b>3</b>), {[Dy<sub>4</sub>(HL)<sub>2</sub>(L)<sub>4</sub>(μ<sub>3</sub>-OH)<sub>2</sub>]·5Â(MeOH)<sub>2</sub>·7H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>4</b>), and {[Dy<sub>4</sub>(HL)<sub>8</sub>(L)<sub>2</sub>]·4MeOH·2H<sub>2</sub>O}Â(<b>5</b>) rare-earth metal complexes of this ligand could be obtained as
single-crystalline materials by the treatment of H<sub>2</sub>L in
the presence of the metal salts [LnÂ(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>·(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub><i>m</i></sub>] (Ln = Y, Dy). In the solid
state, the tetranuclear compounds <b>3</b> and <b>4</b> exhibit butterfly structures, whereas <b>5</b> adopts a rectangular
arrangement. Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry data of the
ionic compounds <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> support single-crystal
X-ray analysis. The yttrium compounds <b>1</b> and <b>3</b> show fluorescence with 11.5% and 13% quantum yield, respectively,
whereas the quantum yield of the dysprosium complex <b>4</b> is low. Magnetic studies on the dysprosium compounds <b>4</b> and <b>5</b> suggest the presence of weak antiferromagnetic
interactions between neighboring metal centers. Compound <b>4</b> shows single-molecule-magnet behavior with two relaxation processes,
one with the effective energy barrier <i>U</i><sub>eff</sub> = 84 K and the preexponential factor τ<sub>0</sub> = 5.1 ×
10<sup>–9</sup> s
Mononuclear and Tetranuclear Compounds of Yttrium and Dysprosium Ligated by a Salicylic Schiff-Base Derivative: Synthesis, Photoluminescence, and Magnetism
The Schiff-base (2-aminoethyl)Âhydroxybenzoic
acid (H<sub>2</sub>L) as a proligand was prepared in situ from 3-formylsalicylic
acid
and ethanolamine (ETA). The mononuclear {[YÂ(HL)<sub>4</sub>]Â[ETAH]·H<sub>2</sub>O} (<b>1</b>) and {[DyÂ(HL)<sub>4</sub>] [ETAH]·3MeOH·H<sub>2</sub>O} (<b>2</b>) and tetranuclear {[Y<sub>4</sub>(HL)<sub>2</sub>(L)<sub>4</sub>(μ<sub>3</sub>-OH)<sub>2</sub>]·4MeOH·4H<sub>2</sub>O} (<b>3</b>), {[Dy<sub>4</sub>(HL)<sub>2</sub>(L)<sub>4</sub>(μ<sub>3</sub>-OH)<sub>2</sub>]·5Â(MeOH)<sub>2</sub>·7H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>4</b>), and {[Dy<sub>4</sub>(HL)<sub>8</sub>(L)<sub>2</sub>]·4MeOH·2H<sub>2</sub>O}Â(<b>5</b>) rare-earth metal complexes of this ligand could be obtained as
single-crystalline materials by the treatment of H<sub>2</sub>L in
the presence of the metal salts [LnÂ(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>·(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub><i>m</i></sub>] (Ln = Y, Dy). In the solid
state, the tetranuclear compounds <b>3</b> and <b>4</b> exhibit butterfly structures, whereas <b>5</b> adopts a rectangular
arrangement. Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry data of the
ionic compounds <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> support single-crystal
X-ray analysis. The yttrium compounds <b>1</b> and <b>3</b> show fluorescence with 11.5% and 13% quantum yield, respectively,
whereas the quantum yield of the dysprosium complex <b>4</b> is low. Magnetic studies on the dysprosium compounds <b>4</b> and <b>5</b> suggest the presence of weak antiferromagnetic
interactions between neighboring metal centers. Compound <b>4</b> shows single-molecule-magnet behavior with two relaxation processes,
one with the effective energy barrier <i>U</i><sub>eff</sub> = 84 K and the preexponential factor τ<sub>0</sub> = 5.1 ×
10<sup>–9</sup> s