Pre-exposure prophylaxis of new COVID-19 coronavirus infection with tixagevimab/cilgavimab in adult Moscow patients with primary immunodeficiencies

Background. Primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs), now known as inborn errors of immunity, are a group of inherited diseases caused by defects in the genes that control the immune response. Patients with PIDs have risks of developing a severe course and/or death in COVID-19. Passive immunization with long-acting monoclonal antibodies (MABs) to SARS-CoV-2 should be considered as pre-exposure prophylaxis in patients with PIDs. Tixagevimab/cilgavimab is a combination of MABs that bind to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Aim. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pre-exposure prophylaxis of new SARS-CoV-2 infection in PIDs with the combination of tixagevimab/cilgavimab. Materials and methods. Forty eight patients diagnosed with PIDs were included in the study. Median follow-up after drug administration was 174 days. The total number of confirmed coronavirus infections in patients with PIDs as well as 6 months before and after administration of MAT were assessed. Results. In the analyzed cohort, the overall incidence of COVID-19 from pandemic onset to MABs administration was 75% (36/48), with 31% (11/36) of over-infected patients having had the infection more than once. The incidence of COVID-19 immediately 6 months before the introduction of tixagevimab/cilgavimab was 40%. All patients who had COVID-19 after pre-exposure prophylaxis had a mild infection. The incidence of COVID-19 6 months after tixagevimab/cilgavimab administration significantly decreased compared to the incidence 6 months before administration (7 and 40%, respectively; p0.001). Conclusion. The use of tixagevimab/cilgavimab in patients with PIDs is effective as pre-exposure prophylaxis and reduces the risk of severe COVID-19

Treatment of atopic dermatitis with upadacitinib: adcare single center experience

IntroductionThe role of upadacitinib in the management of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis seems promising, but more data on its efficacy and safety are needed. This study endeavors to assess the practical impact and safety of upadacitinib in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis, focusing on analyzing patient responses to the treatment.MethodsIn this study, adult patients diagnosed with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis received upadacitinib at daily doses of 15 mg or 30 mg, as prescribed by their attending physicians. The therapeutic efficacy of upadacitinib was meticulously assessed using established clinical metrics. Simultaneously, a comprehensive safety assessment was conducted through monthly monitoring, including the evaluation of potential effects of upadacitinib intake on hepatic function, lipid profile, and hematopoiesis using the pertinent laboratory tests.ResultsSixteen participants were enrolled in the study. At 1month follow-up, there was a significant reduction in the mean Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score to 18.8 points, which further increased to 24 points at the 4-month mark. Additionally, 9 participants (56%) demonstrated an EASI-50 response after 1 month of treatment, with this response increasing to 9 participants (90%) after 4 months. Furthermore, enhanced therapeutic responses were observed at 4 months, with 6 patients (38%) achieving an EASI-75 response at 1month and 8 patients (80%) achieving this milestone at the 4-month follow-up. This study highlights the potential of upadacitinib as an effective treatment option for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. While it demonstrates improved symptom management, close monitoring for potential adverse events, particularly infections and the known risks of Janus kinase inhibitors, is essential. Further research is essential to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of upadacitinib

Rapid selection of BRCA1-proficient tumor cells during neoadjuvant therapy for ovarian cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers

Ovarian carcinomas (OC) often demonstrate rapid tumor shrinkage upon neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). However, complete pathologic responses are very rare and the mechanisms underlying the emergence of residual tumor disease remain elusive. We hypothesized that the change of somatic BRCA1 status may contribute to this process. The loss-of-heterozygosity (LOH) at the BRCA1 locus was determined for 23 paired tumor samples obtained from BRCA1 germ-line mutation carriers before and after NACT. We observed a somatic loss of the wild-type BRCAI allele in 74% (17/23) of OCs before NACT. However, a retention of the wild-type BRCA1 copy resulting in a reversion of LOH status was detected in 65% (11/17) of those patients after NACT. Furthermore, we tested 3 of these reversion samples for LOH at intragenic BRCA1single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and confirmed a complete restoration of the SNP heterozygosity in all instances. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy for BRCA1-associated OC is accompanied by a rapid expansion of pre-existing BRCA1-proficient tumor clones suggesting that continuation of the same therapy after NACT and surgery may not be justified even in patients initially experiencing a rapid tumor regression. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.Peer reviewe

Activated phosphoinositide 3-kinase δ syndrome: Update from the ESID Registry and comparison with other autoimmune-lymphoproliferative inborn errors of immunity

Background: Activated phosphoinositide-3-kinase d syndrome (APDS) is an inborn error of immunity (IEI) with infection susceptibility and immune dysregulation, clinically overlapping with other conditions. Management depends on disease evolution, but predictors of severe disease are lacking. Objectives: This study sought to report the extended spectrum of disease manifestations in APDS1 versus APDS2; compare these to CTLA4 deficiency, NFKB1 deficiency, and STAT3 gain of-function (GOF) disease; and identify predictors of severity in APDS. Methods: Data was collected from the ESID (European Society for Immunodeficiencies)-APDS registry and was compared with published cohorts of the other IEIs. Results: The analysis of 170 patients with APDS outlines high penetrance and early onset of APDS compared to the other IEIs. The large clinical heterogeneity even in individuals with the same PIK3CD variant E1021K illustrates how poorly the genotype predicts the disease phenotype and course. The high clinical overlap between APDS and the other investigated IEIs suggests relevant pathophysiological convergence of the affected pathways. Preferentially affected organ systems indicate specific pathophysiology: bronchiectasis is typical of APDS1; interstitial lung disease and enteropathy are more common in STAT3 GOF and CTLA4 deficiency. Endocrinopathies are most frequent in STAT3 GOF, but growth impairment is also common, particularly in APDS2. Early clinical presentation is a risk factor for severe disease in APDS. Conclusions: APDS illustrates how a single genetic variant can result in a diverse autoimmune-lymphoproliferative phenotype. Overlap with other IEIs is substantial. Some specific features distinguish APDS1 from APDS2. Early onset is a risk factor for severe disease course calling for specific treatment studies in younger patients. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2023;152:984-96.

Agreement between FGFR2 immunohistochemistry assays and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in metastatic gastric cancer: A comparison study.

301 Background: FGFR2 status of a patient with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma could be an important factor in determining optimal treatment strategy with FGFR2 inhibitors and antibodies. The question remains how well different assays agree on the FGFR2 status of the same patient and whether one test can be substituted by another. Methods: Pairwise comparison of 4 tests based on the same patient population was performed: 3 IHC assays [Abcam clone EPR24075-418, R&amp;D clone 98706, Santa Cruz clone C-8] and one FISH test. One hundred and nine formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded samples (including 64 primary tumors and 45 metastases of same patients) were obtained and were stained with FGFR2 IHC assays. Two trained pathologists independently evaluated the percentages of tumor staining and their intensity. FGFR2 FISH was performed as described previously [Su, BJC 2014]. The concordance analysis was performed to assess (1) correlation of FGFR2 expression/amplification between different assays in primary and metastases, (2) the predictive properties of one test of another. Results: After evaluating the expression in the first 19 patients, further study was carried out only using the Abсam assay due to pronounced nuclear staining with other IHC tests. FGFR2 any level expression was detected in 29 (47%) primary tumors and 18 (40%) metastases with concordance of 91%. The prevalence of FGFR2 amplification was 9.4% and intratumoral heterogeneity was observed in 33% of FGFR2 amplified cases. Pearson Correlation Coefficients (PCC) were: 0.89, 0.38 and 0.35 between IHC3+/FISH, IHC≥1% stained cells/FISH and IHC≥10%/FISH, respectively. The table represents how well one assay can predict the same outcome (positivity or negativity) of another assay. Conclusions: Among patients who were negative by FISH, 86%-93% of the patients were negative by IHC assay (Abcam). Among patients who were positive by FISH, 75-80% of them were positive by IHC. FISH should not be recommended as a substitute for a FGFR2 IHC assay due to high probability of false negative prediction as a result of intratumoral heterogeneity and low PCC. [Table: see text] </jats:p

Registry analysis of patients with severe allergic asthma and clinically relevant sensitization to fungal allergens treated with genetically engineered biologics

Background. Fungal sensitization (FS) often escapes the attention of clinicians when assessing the spectrum of sensitization in patients with atopic diseases. According to cohort studies is found in 310% of the general population and in 720% of asthmatics; the proportion of patients with severe bronchial asthma (SBA) with HS ranges from 35 to 75%. Fungal conidia have a 1000-fold higher exposure and are among the most important clinically relevant allergens in asthma. Exposure to fungal allergens is capable of generating a sustained T2 response with production of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-5 and 13, which is indirectly related to the severity of airway eosinophilia. The identification of specific serum IgE is considered the benchmark diagnostic sign of FS, and the encapsulated hydrophobic carrier polymer system is considered preferable to skin prick tests. The process of reclassifying diseases with fungal lung lesions is confusing treatment strategies, leaving the FS problem underestimated. A series of publications have shown that omalizumab and other biologics targeting IL-5 or IL-5 receptor (IL5R) alpha are effective in treating SBA with FS. However, there remains an unmet need in real clinical practice for standardized approaches to genetically engineered biological therapies (BT) for different phenotypes of SBA, especially those associated with impaired microbiological homeostasis and this type of sensitization.&#x0D; Aim. Using retrospective analysis of clinical-dynamic observational data from patients on BT treatment in a real clinical setting to determine phenotypic features of severe allergic bronchial asthma with FS and to perform additional detailed analysis of a cohort of patients on anti-IgE therapy.&#x0D; Materials and methods. A retrospective observational single-center registry study was conducted between June 2017 and August 2021 at the City Reference Center for Allergology and Immunology. The baseline cohort consisted of 198 patients with severe allergic AD who were in the initial phase of BT. Inclusion criteria: age of patients over 18 years; presence of severe allergic bronchial asthma. Complex initial examination of patients included determination of FS by two methods: ImmunoCap ISAC to fungal allergic components alt a1, alt 6 (fungi of genus Alternaria) and asp f1, asp f3, asp f6 (fungi of genus Aspergillus). Specific IgE determinations on fungal panels. Sensitization to fungi was detected in 47 people during allergy examination. The following criteria were considered in evaluation of response to omalizumab: AST score less than 19 and/or difference between initial AST score and this score in dynamics less than 3 points; FEV 1 score less than 80; combination of 2 listed criteria. The minimum period of BT was 16 weeks. Nonparametric methods of descriptive statistics were used: median, interquartile range. Differences were considered significant at p0.05. Data were statistically processed using nonparametric methods in IBM SPSS Statistics V-22 program. MannWhitney U-test and KruskalWallis one-way analysis of variance were used to compare quantitative characteristics. Fisher's 2 test was used to compare qualitative characteristics.&#x0D; Results. Characteristics of the eosinophilic phenotype of SBA combined with FS: middle-aged patients, more often women, with relatively early onset of AD and high baseline eosinophil levels before prescription of biological drug therapy. Concomitant atopic dermatitis and food allergies are additional frequent features of this phenotype. Analysis of the effect of FS on achieving response to omalizumab and further consideration of switching to alternative therapy in SBA and FS patients showed the need to avoid premature revision and perform no earlier than the 10th month of therapy due to delayed response formation. Given the aggressive impact of FS on the barrier functions of the bronchial tree epithelium, it is advisable to test patients for FS at the initial diagnosis of AD. In the presence of atopic dermatitis and/or food allergy as T2 comorbidities in patients with SBA, early testing for FS and increased control of local and systemic inflammation are appropriate, which may improve long-term outcomes and reduce risks of further damage to natural barriers.&#x0D; Conclusion. Further research on various aspects of FS and its role in allergic diseases is extremely relevant in the current context.</jats:p

Optimization of approaches to the management of adult patients with severe atopic dermatitis: analysis of real clinical practice outcomes

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a multifactorial genetically determined immune-mediated skin disease. It is difficult to treat and significantly affects patients quality of life. The development of an integrated approach focusing on atopic multimorbidity, implementation of validated control tools and distinction of clinical parameters specific for different phenotypes of severe forms of disease is especially relevant to patients resistant to standard therapy techniques. Dupilumab, a biologic, is approved for the treatment of the resistant group of patients with moderate to severe AD in the Russian Federation. Dupilumab inhibits the functions of two key cytokines of T2-mediated inflammation IL-4 and IL-13. The article presents personal experience of the authors concerning individual approach to the choice of therapy for the management of this cohort of patients in routine clinical practice. The disease aggravating criteria were determined, which are fundamental for the formation of individual patient portrait for the biologic (dupilumab) treatment for severe AD.</jats:p

Analysis of predictors of response to anti-IgE therapy in patients with severe atopic bronchial asthma in real clinical practice

Introduction. Guidelines on Biological Therapy for Bronchial Asthma of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) identified a number of controversial issues for additional outcome analysis using randomized clinical trials and data from routine clinical practice. In particular, there is unmet need to clarify algorithms for prescribing biologicals using predictors of response and its timing, taking into account risk factors and multimorbidity. Omalizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody of IgG1 class used for the treatment of severe refractory atopic bronchial asthma (BA) and a variety of IgE-mediated diseases. Among biological agents, this "pioneer molecule" has the greatest experience in the "allergology and immunology" profile. Detailed description of the "nonresponders" portraits will allow to perform the therapy response assessment on time and facilitate rational planning of individual therapy, which is a prerequisite for biologicals era. Using only routine methods, it is possible to perform initial and dynamic screening to phenotype a heterogeneous cohort of patients with severe asthma and chose the optimal strategy.&#x0D; Aim. To identify predictors of nonresponse to omalizumab anti-IgE therapy in patients with severe atopic BA and to establish optimal timing of efficacy assessment using retrospective analysis of data from the Biologic Therapy Registry of Allergology and Immunology in routine clinical practice.&#x0D; Materials and methods. A retrospective single-center registry study was conducted at the Allergy and Immunology Reference Center from June 2017 to August 2021. 135 patients with severe BA, with confirmed perennial sensitization, who received omalizumab according to the recommendations of the current version of GINA, were selected from the clinical and dynamic observational system (registry). Dosing regimen and administration frequency of omalizumab were determined in accordance with the instructions for the drug. Assessment of therapy efficacy was performed at the time point 4, 6 and 12 months. Patients were subgrouped into "responders" and "non-responders" according to the following criteria: ACT score less than 19 and/or difference between initial ACT score in dynamics less than 3 points; forced expiratory volume in the first second less than 80%; combination of these two criteria. Nonparametric methods of descriptive statistics were used in data processing: median, interquartile range. Differences were considered significant at p0.05. MannWhitney U-test, KruskalWallis one-way analysis of variance, and Fisher's 2 test were used to compare quantitative characteristics.&#x0D; Results. Heterogeneous subgroups of patients differing in reaching the criteria of "non-responders" to treatment were identified; the informativity of modifiable and unmodifiable factors differed at time-points of dynamic observation. In the differential analysis, two profiles of "nonresponders" were defined in combination with the most significant predictors of "nonrsponse" to omalizumab. According to the data obtained, one of the clinical phenotypes, namely the combination of severe asthma with the Samters triad, corresponded to the characteristics of the patient "nonresponders": age of onset is about 30 years, females, severe exacerbations of BA while taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, accompanied with high levels of eosinophilia.&#x0D; Conclusion. The data obtained illustrates the hypothesis of pathogenetic heterogeneity of severe BA with the phenomenon of overlapping phenotypes and can serve as an additional orienteer for creating the individual plan of anti-IgE therapy in real clinical practice.</jats:p

Pre-exposure prophylaxis of new COVID-19 coronavirus infection with tixagevimab/cilgavimab in adult Moscow patients with primary immunodeficiencies

Background. Primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs), now known as inborn errors of immunity, are a group of inherited diseases caused by defects in the genes that control the immune response. Patients with PIDs have risks of developing a severe course and/or death in COVID-19. Passive immunization with long-acting monoclonal antibodies (MABs) to SARS-CoV-2 should be considered as pre-exposure prophylaxis in patients with PIDs. Tixagevimab/cilgavimab is a combination of MABs that bind to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.&#x0D; Aim. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pre-exposure prophylaxis of new SARS-CoV-2 infection in PIDs with the combination of tixagevimab/cilgavimab.&#x0D; Materials and methods. Forty eight patients diagnosed with PIDs were included in the study. Median follow-up after drug administration was 174 days. The total number of confirmed coronavirus infections in patients with PIDs as well as 6 months before and after administration of MAT were assessed.&#x0D; Results. In the analyzed cohort, the overall incidence of COVID-19 from pandemic onset to MABs administration was 75% (36/48), with 31% (11/36) of over-infected patients having had the infection more than once. The incidence of COVID-19 immediately 6 months before the introduction of tixagevimab/cilgavimab was 40%. All patients who had COVID-19 after pre-exposure prophylaxis had a mild infection. The incidence of COVID-19 6 months after tixagevimab/cilgavimab administration significantly decreased compared to the incidence 6 months before administration (7 and 40%, respectively; p0.001).&#x0D; Conclusion. The use of tixagevimab/cilgavimab in patients with PIDs is effective as pre-exposure prophylaxis and reduces the risk of severe COVID-19.</jats:p

Recurrent angioedema manifestation and treatment response in two patients from different families caring the myoferlin gene mutation: case series

Data on hereditary angioedema with normal C1 inhibitor levels are currently limited. To date, only one Italian family with HAE-MYOF has been described, comprising exclusively female members. The angioedema (AE) of head and neck area with the teenage onset, triggered by menses and high fever episodes were identified. It is necessary to search for potential biomarkers in patients with HAE-MYOF. This case series reports two unrelated individuals from different families with symptoms onset of recurrent AE and identified myoferlin gene mutations. Due to limited knowledge about the clinical presentation, pathogenesis, and treatment response in HAE-MYOF, further data collection is essential.20