Recurrence of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Survival Predicted by Ki67

Background: Despite evidence of different malignant potentials, postoperative follow-up assessment is similar for G1 and G2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs) and adjuvant treatment currently is not indicated. This study investigated the role of Ki67 with regard to recurrence and survival after curative resection of panNET. Methods: Patients with resected non-functioning panNET diagnosed between 1992 and 2016 from three institutions were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who had G1 or G2 tumor without distant metastases or hereditary syndromes were included in the study. The patients were re-categorized into Ki67 0–5 and Ki67 6–20%. Cox regression analysis with log-rank testing for recurrence and survival was performed. Results: The study enrolled 241 patients (86%) with Ki67 0–5% and 39 patients (14%) with Ki67 6–20%. Recurrence was seen in 34 patients (14%) with Ki67 0–5% after a median period of 34 months and in 16 patients (41%) with Ki67 6–20% after a median period of 16 months (p < 0.001). The 5-year recurrence-free and 10-year disease-specific survival periods were respectively 90 and 91% for Ki67 0–5% and respectively 55 and 26% for Ki67 6–20% (p < 0.001). The overall survival period after recurrence was 44.9 months, which was comparable between the two groups (p = 0.283). In addition to a Ki67 rate higher than 5%, tumor larger than 4 cm and lymph node metastases were independently associated with recurrence. Conclusions: Patients at high risk for recurrence after curative resection of G1 or G2 panNET can be identified by a Ki67 rate higher than 5%. These patients should be more closely monitored postoperatively to detect recurrence early and might benefit from adjuvant treatment. A clear postoperative follow-up regimen is proposed

Treatment challenges in and outside a specialist network setting: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms comprise a group of rare tumours with special biology, an often indolent behaviour and particular diagnostic and therapeutic requirements. The specialized biochemical tests and radiological investigations, the complexity of surgical options and the variety of medical treatments that require individual tailoring, mandate a multidisciplinary approach that can be optimally achieved through an organized network. The present study describes currents concepts in the management of these tumours as well as an insight into the challenges of delivering the pathway in and outside a Network

Management of Asymptomatic Sporadic Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (ASPEN) ≤2 cm: Study Protocol for a Prospective Observational Study

Introduction: The optimal treatment for small, asymptomatic, nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NF-PanNEN) is still controversial. European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) guidelines recommend a watchful strategy for asymptomatic NF-PanNEN 18 years, the presence of asymptomatic sporadic NF-PanNEN ≤2 cm proven by a positive fine-needle aspiration (FNA) or by the presence of a measurable nodule on high-quality imaging techniques that is positive at 68Gallium DOTATOC-PET scan. Conclusion: The ASPEN study is designed to investigate if an active surveillance of asymptomatic NF-PanNEN ≤2 cm is safe as compared to surgical approach.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Management of Asymptomatic Sporadic Non-Functioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms No Larger Than 2 Cm: Interim Analysis of Prospective ASPEN Trial

info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Pattern of disease recurrence and treatment after surgery for nonfunctioning well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Background: The risk of recurrence after curative surgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors is reported to be between 10% and 30%. Among the available locoregional and systemic treatments, there are no specific recommendations regarding the best option for treating recurrent disease. The aims of this study were to evaluate the pattern of recurrence after surgery performed with curative intent for nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and to analyze the impact of treatment on disease progression.Methods: All patients submitted to curative surgery for sporadic, well-differentiated, nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors at 2 Italian centers between 2001 and 2018, with evidence of disease recurrence during follow-up, were included (n = 46).Results: The most frequent type of recurrence was distant metastases (n = 38, 83%), located in the liver in 100% of cases, whereas 8 patients (17%) had an isolated local recurrence. Therapy for first disease recurrence included both locoregional (n = 14) and systemic treatments (n = 32). A second disease recurrence/progression occurred in 28 patients (61%). Patients who underwent systemic treatment after the first disease recurrence had better progression-free survival (1-year progression-free survival 78%) compared with those submitted to a locoregional procedure (1-year progression-free survival 50%; P = .007). Independent predictors of shortened progression-free survival after the first disease recurrence were the type of treatment (locoregional, hazard ratio 4.452, P = .001), the presence of necrosis (hazard ratio 2.732, P = .022) and age (&gt;60 year, hazard ratio 2.494, P = .040).Conclusion: Upfront locoregional treatment of the first recurrence of nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors after curative surgery should be avoided in favor of systemic therapy. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved