6 research outputs found
School-based diagnosis and treatment of malaria by teachers using rapid diagnostic tests and artemisinin-based combination therapy: experiences and perceptions of users and implementers of the Learner Treatment Kit, southern Malawi.
BACKGROUND: Training teachers to diagnose uncomplicated malaria using malaria rapid diagnostic tests and treat with artemisinin-based combination therapy has the potential to improve the access of primary school children (6-14 years) to prompt and efficient treatment for malaria, but little is known about the acceptability of such an intervention. This qualitative study explored experiences and perceptions of users and implementers of a programme of school-based malaria case management via a first-aid kit-the Learner Treatment Kit (LTK)-implemented as part of a cluster-randomized controlled trial in Zomba district, Malawi. METHODS: From 29 primary schools where teachers were trained to test and treat school children for malaria using the LTK, six schools were purposively selected on the basis of relative intervention usage (low, medium or high); school size and geographical location. In total eight focus group discussions were held with school children, parents and guardians, and teachers; and 20 in-depth interviews were conducted with key stakeholders at the school, district and national levels. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analysed using a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: The LTK was widely perceived by respondents to be a worthwhile intervention, with the opinion that trained teachers were trusted providers of malaria testing and treatment to school children. Benefits of the programme included a perception of improved access to malaria treatment for school children; decreased school absenteeism; and that the programme supported broader national health and education policies. Potential barriers to successful implementation expressed included increased teacher workloads, a feeling of inadequate supervision from health workers, lack of incentives and concerns for the sustainability of the programme regarding the supply of drugs and commodities. CONCLUSION: Training teachers to test for and treat uncomplicated malaria in schools was well received by both users and implementers alike, and was perceived by the majority of stakeholders to be a valuable programme. Factors raised as critical to the success of such a programme included ensuring an effective supervisory system, a reliable supply chain, and the training of greater numbers of teachers per school to manage high consultation numbers, especially during the peak malaria transmission season
Design, implementation and evaluation of a training programme for school teachers in the use of malaria rapid diagnostic tests as part of a basic first aid kit in southern Malawi.
BACKGROUND: With increasing levels of enrolment, primary schools present a pragmatic opportunity to improve the access of school children to timely diagnosis and treatment of malaria, increasingly recognised as a major health problem within this age group. The expanded use of malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) by community health workers (CHWs) has raised the prospect of whether teachers can provide similar services for school children. We describe and evaluate the training of primary school teachers to use a first aid kit containing malaria RDTs and ACT for the diagnosis and treament of uncomplicated malaria in school children in southern Malawi. METHODS: We outline the development of the intervention as: (1) conception and design, (2) pilot training, (3) final training, and (4) 7-month follow up. The training materials were piloted at a four-day workshop in July 2013 following their design at national stakeholders meetings. The evaluation of the pilot training and materials were assessed in relation to increased knowledge and skill sets using checklist evaluations and questionnaires, the results of which informed the design of a final seven-day training programme held in December 2013. A follow up of trained teachers was carried out in July 2014 following 7 months of routine implementation. A total of 15 teachers were evaluated at four stages: pilot training, two weeks following pilot, final training and seven months following final training. RESULTS: A total of 15 and 92 teachers were trained at the pilot and final training respectively. An average of 93 % of the total steps required to use RDTs were completed correctly at the final training, declining to 87 % after 7 months. All teachers were observed correctly undertaking safe blood collection and handling, accurate RDT interpretation, and correct dispensing of ACT. The most commonly observed errors were a failure to wait 20 minutes before reading the test result, and adding an incorrect volume of buffer to the test cassette. CONCLUSION: Following training, teachers are able to competently use RDTs and ACTs test and treat children at school for uncomplicated malaria safely and accurately. Teachers demonstrate a comparable level of RDT use relative to non-health professional users of RDTs, and sustain this competency over a period of seven months during routine implementation
Learner Treatment Kit (school-based malaria diagnosis and treatment in southern Malawi): Study data and support materials
A set of data collection tools, STATA .do processing scripts, and resultant datasets produced as part of the Learner Treatment Kit (LTK) Project, a study funded to evaluate the impact of a school-based programme of malaria diagnosis and treatment (malaria case management) as part of a wider school first-aid kit exploring school attendance, health and education outcomes. The study conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial in 58 primary schools in TA Chikowi, Zomba district of southern Malawi. The intervention, implemented between 2013-2015 in 29 randomly selected schools from the total of 58 schools, comprised providing free-of-charge malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) to primary schools to be used by trained teachers to diagnose and treat uncomplicated malaria, as part of basic first aid kits known as "Learner Treatment Kits" (LTKs). The primary outcome was school attendance, assessed through teacher-recorded school attendance registers and periodic spot checks. Secondary outcomes included prevalence of Plasmodium spp. infection, anaemia, educational performance, self-reported child wellbeing, and health seeking behaviour. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02213211
Learner Treatment Kit (school-based malaria diagnosis and treatment in southern Malawi): Study data and support materials
A set of data collection tools, STATA .do processing scripts, and resultant datasets produced as part of the Learner Treatment Kit (LTK) Project, a study funded to evaluate the impact of a school-based programme of malaria diagnosis and treatment (malaria case management) as part of a wider school first-aid kit exploring school attendance, health and education outcomes. The study conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial in 58 primary schools in TA Chikowi, Zomba district of southern Malawi. The intervention, implemented between 2013-2015 in 29 randomly selected schools from the total of 58 schools, comprised providing free-of-charge malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) to primary schools to be used by trained teachers to diagnose and treat uncomplicated malaria, as part of basic first aid kits known as "Learner Treatment Kits" (LTKs). The primary outcome was school attendance, assessed through teacher-recorded school attendance registers and periodic spot checks. Secondary outcomes included prevalence of Plasmodium spp. infection, anaemia, educational performance, self-reported child wellbeing, and health seeking behaviour. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02213211
Impact of school-based malaria case management on school attendance, health and education outcomes: a cluster randomised trial in southern Malawi.
Introduction: Evidence indicates children who suffer from ill-health are less likely to attend or complete schooling. Malaria is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in school-age children. However, they are less likely to receive malaria treatment at health facilities and evidence for how to improve schoolchildren's access to care is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a programme of school-based malaria case management on schoolchildren's attendance, health and education. Methods: A cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted in 58 primary schools in Zomba District, Malawi, 2011-2015. The intervention, implemented in 29 randomly selected schools, provided malaria rapid diagnostic tests and artemisinin-based combination therapy to diagnose and treat uncomplicated malaria as part of basic first aid kits known as 'Learner Treatment Kits' (LTK). The primary outcome was school attendance, assessed through teacher-recorded daily attendance registers and independent periodic attendance spot checks. Secondary outcomes included prevalence of Plasmodium spp infection, anaemia, educational performance, self-reported child well-being and health-seeking behaviour. A total of 9571 children from standards 1-7 were randomly selected for assessment of school attendance, with subsamples assessed for the secondary outcomes. Results: Between November 2013 and March 2015, 97 trained teachers in 29 schools provided 32 685 unique consultations. Female schoolchildren were significantly more likely than male to seek a consultation (unadjusted OR=1.78 (95% CI 1.58 to 2.00). No significant intervention effect was observed on the proportion of child-days recorded as absent in teacher registers (n=9017 OR=0.90 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.05), p=0.173) or of children absent during random school visits-spot checks (n=5791 OR=1.09 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.36), p=0.474). There was no significant impact on child-reported well-being, prevalence of Plasmodium spp, anaemia or education scores. Conclusion: Despite high community demand, the LTK programme did not reduce schoolchildren's absenteeism or improve health or education outcomes in this study setting. Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02213211