Can Implicit Measures Augment Suicide Detection in Youth? The Feasibility and Acceptability of the Death Implicit Association Test Among Pediatric Medical Impatients

Background: Medically ill youth are at increased suicide risk, necessitating early detection. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of administering the Death Implicit Association Test (Death IAT) to pediatric medical inpatients. Methods: Participants completed measures including the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) and the Death IAT. Results: Over 90% of participants found the Death IAT to be acceptable and more than 75% of participants were comfortable completing the task. There was a small, but statistically significant, improvement from pre-survey to post-survey reports of mood (t(174) = 3.02, p = 0.003, d = 0.15). Participants who endorsed a past suicide attempt on the ASQ had significantly higher “suicide” trial D-scores than those without a past suicide attempt (Wilcoxon W = 1312; p = 0.048; d = 0.61). Conclusions: Implementing an IAT measure among pediatric medical inpatients was feasible and acceptable. In exploratory analyses, “suicide” trial IAT D-scores were associated with past suicide attempts, suggesting future studies should examine whether implicit measures may be useful in hospital settings to augment detection of youth suicide risk

Adaptations Made to Pediatric Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry Service Delivery During the Early Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A North American Multisite Survey.

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic led to rapid changes in clinical service delivery across hospital systems nationally. Local realities and resources were key driving factors impacting workflow changes, including for pediatric consultation-liaison psychiatry service (PCLPS) providers.ObjectiveThis study aims to describe the early changes implemented by 22 PCLPSs from the United States and Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding similarities and differences in adaptations made to PCLPS care delivery can inform best practices and future models of care.MethodsA 20-point survey relating to PCLPS changes during the COVID-19 pandemic was sent to professional listservs. Baseline hospital demographics, hospital and PCLPS workflow changes, and PCLPS experience were collected from March 20 to April 28, 2020, and from August 18 to September 10, 2020. Qualitative data were collected from responding sites. An exploratory thematic analysis approach was used to analyze the qualitative data that were not dependent on predetermined coding themes. Descriptive statistics were calculated using Microsoft Excel.ResultsTwenty-two academic hospitals in the United States and Canada responded to the survey, with an average of 303 beds/hospital. Most respondents (18/22) were children's hospitals. Despite differences in regional impact of COVID-19 and resource availability, there was significant overlap in respondent experiences. Restricted visitation to one caregiver, use of virtual rounding, ongoing trainee involvement, and an overall low number of COVID-positive pediatric patients were common. While there was variability in PCLPS care delivery occurring virtually versus in person, all respondents maintained some level of on-site presence. Technological limitations and pediatric provider preference led to increased on-site presence.ConclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first multicenter study exploring pandemic-related PCLPS changes in North America. Findings of this study demonstrate that PCLPSs rapidly adapted to COVID-19 realities. Common themes emerged that may serve as a model for future practice. However, important gaps in understanding their effectiveness and acceptability need to be addressed. This multisite survey highlights the importance of establishing consensus through national professional organizations to inform provider and hospital practices

Opinions on Youth Suicide Risk Screening from Individuals with Neurodevelopmental Disabilities and Their Therapists: A Pilot Study

Background: Individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD) are at increased risk for suicide, yet little work has been done to address the specific needs for this population. Specifically, there are no validated suicide risk screening instruments and processes for individuals with NDD; this study aimed to assess the opinions of individuals with NDD and their therapists on suicide risk screening in order to inform best practices for screening. Method: A pilot study was launched to qualitatively evaluate processes and instruments that may be used in future studies on suicide screening risk in NDDs. Participants and their therapists were surveyed after filling out suicide risk screening instruments and provided qualitative feedback on their opinions of screening for suicide risk. Results: Most participants (9/15) reported positive experiences of being screened for suicide risk. Additionally, almost all therapists (14/15) were in support of suicide risk screening. Several themes, such as interpersonal benefits, emerged as reasons for supporting screening. Conclusions: The findings from this pilot study provide initial qualitative evidence that many individuals with NDD and their therapists would be comfortable with and are in support of suicide risk screening for this population. Screening tools to guide clinicians on how to ask about suicide risk are needed and appear to be desired by clinicians on the frontlines of mental health treatment for people with NDD

Non-suicidal self-injury and suicide risk among adult medical inpatients

Background: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a potent risk factor for suicide among youth. There is limited research, however, on the association between NSSI and suicide risk among adults, particularly among adult medical patients, who are a population at increased risk for suicide. To address this research gap, the current analysis aimed to describe the association between lifetime history of NSSI and suicide risk in an adult medical inpatient population. Method: Adult medical inpatients aged 18 or older from one of four United States hospitals were screened for suicide risk and a lifetime history of NSSI. Suicide risk was determined using the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ). NSSI history, methods, frequency, and severity were assessed via a structured interview based on the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview. Results: A total of 621 adult medical inpatients were included in this secondary analysis (55.2% male; 60.9% White; M[SD] age = 50.3[16.7]); 5.8% of patients (36/621) reported a lifetime history of NSSI and 16.1% (100/621) screened positive for suicide risk. Patients with a lifetime history of NSSI were significantly more likely to screen positive for suicide risk (OR = 9.4 [95% CI, 4.4–20.8]; p < 0.0001). Limitations: This analysis used cross sectional data and could not examine any causal relationships between NSSI and suicide risk. Conclusions: Adult medical inpatients with a lifetime history of NSSI were significantly more likely to screen positive for suicide risk. Research examining NSSI among adult medical patients is especially relevant for suicide risk detection and prevention efforts

Limitations of Screening for Depression as a Proxy for Suicide Risk in Adult Medical Inpatients

BACKGROUND: Medically ill hospitalized patients are at elevated risk for suicide. Hospitals that already screen for depression often use depression screening as a proxy for suicide risk screening. Extant research has indicated that screening for depression may not be sufficient to identify all patients at risk for suicide. OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to determine the effectiveness of a depression screening tool, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, in detecting suicide risk among adult medical inpatients. METHODS: Participants were recruited from inpatient medical/surgical units in 4 hospitals as part of a larger validation study. Participants completed the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and 2 suicide risk measures: the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions and the Adult Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 727 adult medical inpatients (53.4% men; 61.8% white; mean age 50.1 +/- 16.3 years). A total of 116 participants (116 of 727 [16.0%]) screened positive for suicide risk and 175 (175 of 727 [24.1%]) screened positive for depression. Of the 116 patients who screened positive for suicide risk, 36 (31.0%) screened negative for depression on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Of 116, 73 (62.9%) individuals who were at risk for suicide did not endorse item 9 (thoughts of harming oneself or of being better off dead) on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. CONCLUSION: Using depression screening tools as a proxy for suicide risk may be insufficient to detect adult medical inpatients at risk for suicide. Asking directly about suicide risk and using validated tools is necessary to effectively and efficiently screen for suicide risk in this population