Cartilage quantification using contrast-enhanced MRI in the wrist of rheumatoid arthritis: cartilage loss is associated with bone marrow edema

Objective: To quantify wrist cartilage using contrast MRI and compare with the extent of adjacent synovitis and bone marrow edema (BME) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: 18 patients with RA underwent post-contrast fat-suppressed T-1 weighted coronal imaging. Cartilage area at the centre of the scaphoid-capitate and radius-scaphoid joints was measured by in-house developed software. We defined cartilage as the pixels with signal intensity between two thresholds (lower: 0.4, 0.5 and 0.6 times the muscle signal, upper: 0.9, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 times the muscle signal). We investigated the association of cartilage loss with synovitis and BME score derived from RA MRI scoring system. Results: Cartilage area was correlated with BME score when thresholds were adequately set with lower threshold at 0.6 times the muscle signal and upper threshold at 1.2 times the muscle signal for both SC (r(s)=-0.469, p < 0.05) and RS (r(s)= -0.486,p < 0.05) joints, while it showed no significant correlation with synovitis score at any thresholds. Conclusion: Our software can accurately quantify cartilage in the wrist and BME associated with cartilage loss in patients with RA. Advances in knowledge: Our software can quantify cartilage using conventional MR images of the wrist. BME is associated with cartilage loss in RA patients

Computed diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating synovial proliferation from joint effusion in hand arthritis

The objective of this study is to investigate computed DWI (cDWI) as an alternative method to contrast-enhanced MRI in comparison with directory measured DWI (mDWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for differentiating synovial proliferation from joint effusion. Nine patients suspected with RA (5 women) were included in this study. A radiologist identified region of interest (ROI) based on STIR, and evaluated using a 5-point grading scale of 0 (fluid) to 4 (synovial proliferation) according to the degree of contrast enhancement within the ROI. cDWI was synthesized for b values from 1000 to 2000 at 200 s/mm(2) intervals using the combination of b values at mDWI. In addition to ADC values, contrast ratios were calculated using signal intensity for each ROI on the mDWI and cDWI. Visual assessment by a radiologist was conducted between pairs of STIR image and mDWI or cDWI. ROI grades were most significantly correlated with cDWI(2000) based on b values of 400-1000 s/mm(2) (r(s) = 0.405, p < 0.01). The area under the curve of cDWI(2000) based on b values of 400-1000 s/mm(2) (0.762) was larger than that of ADC values (0.570-0.608) when comparing low versus high contrast enhancement grades. Both cDWI(1800) (200-1000) and cDWI(2000) (400-1000) demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in visual assessment (84.6% and 66.7%, respectively). The cDWI(2000) based on b values of 400-1000 s/mm(2) may be useful for noninvasive differentiation of synovial proliferation from joint effusion in hand arthritis

Composite assessment of power Doppler ultrasonography and MRI in rheumatoid arthritis: a pilot study of predictive value in radiographic progression after one year

Objective: Power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS) and MRI are independently useful to predict structural damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We hypothesize that there is a complementary relationship between these modalities. The aim of this study is, therefore, to investigate the usefulness of the predictive value of composite assessment of PDUS and contrast-enhanced MRI in radiographic outcomes in patients with RA. Methods: 20 patients (17 females and 3 males) with RA on disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs underwent PDUS and MRI of both hands at baseline. Radiography of the bilateral hands was performed at baseline and at 1 year, Articular synovitis on PDUS was evaluated according to quantitative measurement. Synovitis, bone marrow edema and bone erosion were scored according to the RA MRI scoring method. The changes of joint space narrowing and bone erosion on radiograph were assessed by the Sharp/van der Heijde method. We applied t-statistics to combine the assessment of quantitative PDUS with semiquantitative MRI. Results: Structural damage progression for radiography was not correlated with any evaluations for MRI, while it showed significant correlation with synovitis on PDUS (r(s) = 0.597, p = 0.005). The composite assessment of both modalities (synovitis for PDUS and bone marrow edema for MRI) was correlated with structural damage progression on radiograph (r(s) = 0.792, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Composite assessment of PDUS and MRI may have a stronger predictive value in radiographic progression than PDUS or MRI alone in RA. Advances In knowledge: Composite assessment of PDUS and MRI may be an effective predictor of structural damage in RA

Quantitative power Doppler signal assessment in the subchondral bone region of the metacarpophalangeal joint is an effective predictor of radiographic progression in the hand of rheumatoid arthritis: a pilot study

Ultrasonography is useful for assessment of synovitis in the hand of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive value of the quantitative power Doppler (PD) signal assessment in the subchondral bone region of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint in patients with RA showing radiographic progression of the hand by comparing with those of previously reported scoring systems. Twenty-two patients (20 women) with RA who underwent power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS) of the bilateral one to five MCP joints at baseline were included in the study. Radiography of both hands was performed at baseline and at 1year. PDUS of the synovial space was evaluated according to semi-quantitative scoring (0-3) and quantitative measurement (0-100%). The PD signal in the subchondral bone region was qualitatively (0, 1) and quantitatively (mm(2)) assessed. The performance of PDUS assessment was compared using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the risk ratio (RR). As a predictor for radiographic progression, the quantitative PD signal assessment in the subchondral bone region (AUC=0.842, p<0.01) was equivalent to quantitative vascularity (AUC=0.817, p<0.05) and semi-quantitative scoring (AUC=0.754, p<0.05). As for the RR of the PD signal in the subchondral bone region for radiographic progression, the quantitative PD signal assessment was 5.40 (p<0.01), whereas the qualitative PD signal assessment was 1.60 (p=0.204). Quantitative PD signal assessment in the subchondral bone region can predict radiographic progression in the hand of RA patients