Rapid Combinatorial ERLIC–SCX Solid-Phase Extraction for In-Depth Phosphoproteome Analysis

Protein phosphorylation is an important mechanism of cellular signaling, and many proteins are precisely regulated through the interplay of stimulatory and inhibitory phosphorylation sites. Phosphoproteomics offers great opportunities to unravel this complex interplay, generating a mechanistic understanding of vital cellular processes. However, protein phosphorylation is substoichiometric and, in particular, peptides carrying multiple phosphorylation sites are extremely difficult to detect in a highly complex mixture of abundant nonphosphorylated peptides. Chromatographic methods are employed to reduce sample complexity and thereby significantly increase the number of phosphopeptide identifications. We previously demonstrated that combinatorial strong cation exchange–electrostatic repulsion–hydrophilic interaction chromatography yields a surplus in overall identifications of phosphopeptides compared with single chromatographic approaches. Here we present a simple and rapid strategy implemented as solid-phase extraction not requiring specific instrumentation such as off-line HPLC systems. It is inexpensive, adaptable for high and low amounts of starting material, and saves time by allowing multiplexed sample preparation without any carry-over problem

Rapid Combinatorial ERLIC–SCX Solid-Phase Extraction for In-Depth Phosphoproteome Analysis

Protein phosphorylation is an important mechanism of cellular signaling, and many proteins are precisely regulated through the interplay of stimulatory and inhibitory phosphorylation sites. Phosphoproteomics offers great opportunities to unravel this complex interplay, generating a mechanistic understanding of vital cellular processes. However, protein phosphorylation is substoichiometric and, in particular, peptides carrying multiple phosphorylation sites are extremely difficult to detect in a highly complex mixture of abundant nonphosphorylated peptides. Chromatographic methods are employed to reduce sample complexity and thereby significantly increase the number of phosphopeptide identifications. We previously demonstrated that combinatorial strong cation exchange–electrostatic repulsion–hydrophilic interaction chromatography yields a surplus in overall identifications of phosphopeptides compared with single chromatographic approaches. Here we present a simple and rapid strategy implemented as solid-phase extraction not requiring specific instrumentation such as off-line HPLC systems. It is inexpensive, adaptable for high and low amounts of starting material, and saves time by allowing multiplexed sample preparation without any carry-over problem

Fragments

In large-scale phosphoproteomics studies, fractionation by strong cation exchange (SCX) or electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ERLIC) is commonly used to reduce sample complexity, fractionate phosphopeptides from their unmodified counterparts, and increase the dynamic range for phosphopeptide identification. However, these procedures do not succeed to separate, both singly and multiply phosphorylated peptides due to their inverse physicochemical characteristics. Hence, depending on the chosen method only one of the two peptide classes can be efficiently separated. Here, we present a novel strategy based on the combinatorial separation of singly and multiply phosphorylated peptides by SCX and ERLIC for in-depth phosphoproteome analysis. In SCX, mostly singly phosphorylated peptides are retained and fractionated while not-retained multiply phosphorylated peptides are fractionated in a subsequent ERLIC approach (SCX–ERLIC). In ERLIC, multiply phosphorylated peptides are fractionated, while not-retained singly phosphorylated peptides are separated by SCX (ERLIC–SCX). Compared to single step fractionations by SCX, the combinatorial strategies, SCX–ERLIC and ERLIC–SCX, yield up to 48% more phosphopeptide identifications as well as a strong increase in the number of detected multiphosphorylated peptides. Phosphopeptides identified in two subsequent, complementary fractionations had little overlap (5%) indicating that ERLIC and SCX are orthogonal methods ideally suited for in-depth phosphoproteome studies

Rapid Combinatorial ERLIC–SCX Solid-Phase Extraction for In-Depth Phosphoproteome Analysis

Protein phosphorylation is an important mechanism of cellular signaling, and many proteins are precisely regulated through the interplay of stimulatory and inhibitory phosphorylation sites. Phosphoproteomics offers great opportunities to unravel this complex interplay, generating a mechanistic understanding of vital cellular processes. However, protein phosphorylation is substoichiometric and, in particular, peptides carrying multiple phosphorylation sites are extremely difficult to detect in a highly complex mixture of abundant nonphosphorylated peptides. Chromatographic methods are employed to reduce sample complexity and thereby significantly increase the number of phosphopeptide identifications. We previously demonstrated that combinatorial strong cation exchange–electrostatic repulsion–hydrophilic interaction chromatography yields a surplus in overall identifications of phosphopeptides compared with single chromatographic approaches. Here we present a simple and rapid strategy implemented as solid-phase extraction not requiring specific instrumentation such as off-line HPLC systems. It is inexpensive, adaptable for high and low amounts of starting material, and saves time by allowing multiplexed sample preparation without any carry-over problem

Additional file 1 of Isometric and isokinetic strength of lower-limb muscles in female athletes during different phases of menstrual cycle: a causal-comparative study

Supplementary Material 1: The STROBE checklist is included in the supplementary file

Comparison of ERLIC–TiO₂, HILIC–TiO₂, and SCX–TiO₂ for Global Phosphoproteomics Approaches

Reversible phosphorylations play a critical role in most biological pathways. Hence, in signaling studies great effort has been put into identification of a maximum number of phosphosites per experiment. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based phosphoproteomics approaches have been proven to be an ideal analytical method for mapping of phosphosites. However, because of sample complexity, fractionation of phosphopeptides prior to MS analysis is a crucial step. In the current study, we compare the chromatographic strategies electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ERLIC), hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC), and strong cation exchange chromatography (SCX) for their fractionation behavior of phosphopeptides. In addition, we investigate the use of repetitive TiO2-based enrichment steps for a maximum identification of phosphopeptides. On the basis of our results, SCX yields the highest number of identified phosphopeptides, whereas ERLIC is optimal for the identification of multiphosphorylated peptides. Consecutive incubations of fractions and flow-through by TiO2 beads enrich qualitatively different sets of phosphopeptides, increasing the number of identified phosphopeptides per analysis

Comparison of ERLIC–TiO₂, HILIC–TiO₂, and SCX–TiO₂ for Global Phosphoproteomics Approaches

Reversible phosphorylations play a critical role in most biological pathways. Hence, in signaling studies great effort has been put into identification of a maximum number of phosphosites per experiment. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based phosphoproteomics approaches have been proven to be an ideal analytical method for mapping of phosphosites. However, because of sample complexity, fractionation of phosphopeptides prior to MS analysis is a crucial step. In the current study, we compare the chromatographic strategies electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ERLIC), hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC), and strong cation exchange chromatography (SCX) for their fractionation behavior of phosphopeptides. In addition, we investigate the use of repetitive TiO2-based enrichment steps for a maximum identification of phosphopeptides. On the basis of our results, SCX yields the highest number of identified phosphopeptides, whereas ERLIC is optimal for the identification of multiphosphorylated peptides. Consecutive incubations of fractions and flow-through by TiO2 beads enrich qualitatively different sets of phosphopeptides, increasing the number of identified phosphopeptides per analysis

Comparison of ERLIC–TiO₂, HILIC–TiO₂, and SCX–TiO₂ for Global Phosphoproteomics Approaches

Reversible phosphorylations play a critical role in most biological pathways. Hence, in signaling studies great effort has been put into identification of a maximum number of phosphosites per experiment. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based phosphoproteomics approaches have been proven to be an ideal analytical method for mapping of phosphosites. However, because of sample complexity, fractionation of phosphopeptides prior to MS analysis is a crucial step. In the current study, we compare the chromatographic strategies electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ERLIC), hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC), and strong cation exchange chromatography (SCX) for their fractionation behavior of phosphopeptides. In addition, we investigate the use of repetitive TiO2-based enrichment steps for a maximum identification of phosphopeptides. On the basis of our results, SCX yields the highest number of identified phosphopeptides, whereas ERLIC is optimal for the identification of multiphosphorylated peptides. Consecutive incubations of fractions and flow-through by TiO2 beads enrich qualitatively different sets of phosphopeptides, increasing the number of identified phosphopeptides per analysis

Comparison of ERLIC–TiO₂, HILIC–TiO₂, and SCX–TiO₂ for Global Phosphoproteomics Approaches

Reversible phosphorylations play a critical role in most biological pathways. Hence, in signaling studies great effort has been put into identification of a maximum number of phosphosites per experiment. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based phosphoproteomics approaches have been proven to be an ideal analytical method for mapping of phosphosites. However, because of sample complexity, fractionation of phosphopeptides prior to MS analysis is a crucial step. In the current study, we compare the chromatographic strategies electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ERLIC), hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC), and strong cation exchange chromatography (SCX) for their fractionation behavior of phosphopeptides. In addition, we investigate the use of repetitive TiO2-based enrichment steps for a maximum identification of phosphopeptides. On the basis of our results, SCX yields the highest number of identified phosphopeptides, whereas ERLIC is optimal for the identification of multiphosphorylated peptides. Consecutive incubations of fractions and flow-through by TiO2 beads enrich qualitatively different sets of phosphopeptides, increasing the number of identified phosphopeptides per analysis

Comparison of ERLIC–TiO₂, HILIC–TiO₂, and SCX–TiO₂ for Global Phosphoproteomics Approaches

Reversible phosphorylations play a critical role in most biological pathways. Hence, in signaling studies great effort has been put into identification of a maximum number of phosphosites per experiment. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based phosphoproteomics approaches have been proven to be an ideal analytical method for mapping of phosphosites. However, because of sample complexity, fractionation of phosphopeptides prior to MS analysis is a crucial step. In the current study, we compare the chromatographic strategies electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ERLIC), hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC), and strong cation exchange chromatography (SCX) for their fractionation behavior of phosphopeptides. In addition, we investigate the use of repetitive TiO2-based enrichment steps for a maximum identification of phosphopeptides. On the basis of our results, SCX yields the highest number of identified phosphopeptides, whereas ERLIC is optimal for the identification of multiphosphorylated peptides. Consecutive incubations of fractions and flow-through by TiO2 beads enrich qualitatively different sets of phosphopeptides, increasing the number of identified phosphopeptides per analysis