Inclusion of new microsatellite repeats in allelic loss analysis excludes retention of heterozygosity in the renal cell carcinoma critical region in 3p21

A variety of human cancers, including renal cell carcinoma (RCC), show frequent heterozygous deletion events in 3p21.3. An approximate 400-kb segment from within 3p21.3 is suspect of harboring a tumor suppressor gene, as it is homozygously deleted in three lung cancer cell lines and heterozygously deleted in virtually all lung tumors. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) studies of this segment are hampered by the absence of highly informative markers. We have identified several new nucleotide repeats that map within this region, and have used these to complement our previous LOH studies in RCC. Our present analysis clearly shows that the common region of homozygous deletions in the lung cancer cell lines is always contained within the smallest region of overlap of heterozygous deletions in RCC. (C) Elsevier Science Inc., 1999. All rights reserved

Inclusion of new microsatellite repeats in allelic loss analysis excludes retention of heterozygosity in the renal cell carcinoma critical region in 3p21

A variety of human cancers, including renal cell carcinoma (RCC), show frequent heterozygous deletion events in 3p21.3. An approximate 400-kb segment from within 3p21.3 is suspect of harboring a tumor suppressor gene, as it is homozygously deleted in three lung cancer cell lines and heterozygously deleted in virtually all lung tumors. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) studies of this segment are hampered by the absence of highly informative markers. We have identified several new nucleotide repeats that map within this region, and have used these to complement our previous LOH studies in RCC. Our present analysis clearly shows that the common region of homozygous deletions in the lung cancer cell lines is always contained within the smallest region of overlap of heterozygous deletions in RCC. (C) Elsevier Science Inc., 1999. All rights reserved

Development and content of a group-based intervention to improve medication adherence in non-adherent patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Item does not contain fulltextOBJECTIVE: To describe the systematic development and content of a short intervention to improve medication adherence to disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in non-adherent patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: The intervention mapping (IM) framework was used to develop the intervention. The following IM steps were conducted: (1) a needs assessment; (2) formulation of specific intervention objectives; (3) inventory of methods and techniques needed to design the intervention and (4) production and piloting of the intervention. RESULTS: The intervention (consisting of two group sessions led by a pharmacist, a homework assignment, and a follow-up call) aims to improve the balance between necessity and concern beliefs about medication, and to resolve practical barriers in medication taking. The central communication method used is motivational interviewing. CONCLUSION: By applying the IM framework, we were able to create a feasible, time-efficient and promising intervention to improve medication adherence in non-adherent RA patients. Intervention effects are currently being assessed in a randomized controlled trial. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This paper could serve as a guideline for other health care professionals when developing similar interventions. If the RCT demonstrates sufficient effectiveness of this intervention in reducing medication non-adherence in RA patients, the intervention could be embedded in clinical practice