The human cathelicidin hCAP-18 in serum of children with haemato-oncological diseases

The human cathelicidin hCAP-18 (pro-LL-37) is the pro-protein of the antimicrobial peptide LL-37. hCAP-18 can be produced by many different cell types; bone marrow neutrophil precursors are the main source of hCAP-18 in the circulation. Neutrophil count is used as a marker for myelopoiesis but does not always reflect neutrophil production in the bone marrow, and thus additional markers are needed. In this study, we established the reference interval of serum hCAP-18 level in healthy children and compared serum hCAP-18 levels between different diagnostic groups of children with haemato-oncological diseases, at diagnosis. We found that children with diseases that impair myelopoiesis, such as acute leukaemia, aplastic anaemia, or myelodysplastic syndrome, presented with low hCAP-18 levels, whereas patients with non-haematological malignancies displayed serum hCAP-18 levels in the same range as healthy children. Children with chronic myeloid leukaemia presented with high circulating levels of hCAP-18, probably reflecting the high number of all differentiation stages of myeloid cells. We suggest that analysis of serum hCAP-18 provides additional information regarding myelopoiesis in children with haemato-oncological diseases, which may have future implications in assessment of myelopoiesis in clinical management

Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping to guide targeted anti-D prophylaxis-an external quality assessment workshop.

To access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink belowBACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Fetal RHD genotyping of cell-free fetal DNA from RhD-negative pregnant women can be used to guide targeted antenatal and postnatal anti-D prophylaxis for the prevention of RhD immunization. To assure the quality of clinical testing, we conducted an external quality assessment workshop with the participation of 28 laboratories. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Aliquots of pooled maternal plasma were sent to each laboratory. One sample was positive, and the second sample was negative for fetal RHD, verified by pre-workshop testing using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) analysis of RHD exons 4, 5, 7 and 10. Plasma samples were shipped at room temperature. A reporting scheme was supplied for data collection, including questions regarding the methodological setup, results and clinical recommendations. Different methodological approaches were used, all employing qPCR with a total of eight different combinations of RHD exon targets. The samples were tested blindly. RESULTS: Fetal RHD genotyping was performed with no false-negative and no false-positive results. One inconclusive result was reported for the RHD-positive sample, and four inconclusive results were reported for the RHD-negative sample. All clinical conclusions were satisfactory. CONCLUSION: This external quality assessment workshop demonstrates that despite the different approaches taken to perform the clinical assays, fetal RHD genotyping is a reliable laboratory assay to guide targeted use of Rh prophylaxis in a clinical setting