Oral surgery referrals at a UK dental hospital in the context of a managed vlinical network: a mixed-methods study

Background and aims: To inform the first Welsh OS Managed Clinical Network (MCN), a mixed-methods study investigated existing patterns, quality, suitability and reasons for referral to secondary care at the University Dental Hospital in Wales. Materials and methods: A random sample of 298 OS referrals were studied over a six-month period. Data recording proforma included details on referral practitioner, patient and referral diagnosis. Referrals were categorised by Levels of complexity (Levels 1, 2 and 3) and face-to-face, semi-structured and audio-recorded interviews were conducted with five frequent referrers. Results: The age range of patients was between 1 and 92 years, with over 58% (n=174) female. Majority of referrals (80%) were from GDPs. Top six practices accounted for a fifth (21%) of referrals, with three of these practices were corporate dental chains. Approximately, a third of referrals were categorised as Level 1 (37%), Level 2 (33%) and Level 3 (30%) complexity. 16% provided no medical history, and only 13% included supporting radiographs. Five themes emerged as reasons for oral surgery referrals: contract limitations, perception that new graduates lack OS practical skills, communication, practice resources and risk. Conclusions: Priorities for the Wales OS MCN are to reduce inappropriate referrals to secondary care and to ensure quality referrals. Introduction of the pan-Wales electronic Referral Management System in May 2019 is welcome in this context. The newly formed Health Education and Improvement Wales, with lead roles in education, training and shaping the healthcare workforce, will form a vital part in tackling barriers for safe OS in primary care

The use of non-surgical interventions in patients with periimplantitis; a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives: To systematically assess the efficacy of different non‐surgical treatment methods to manage peri‐implantitis reported to date in the literature, together with its correlation with time following therapy. Materials and Methods: A systematic literature review was undertaken to identify randomised control trials of the non‐surgical management of peri‐implantitis published up to November 2019. The search was limited to English language human studies containing follow‐up periods of ≥3 months and for sample size of 10 or more patients. A meta‐analysis was implemented for the following clinical parameters: Peri‐implant pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP), clinical attachment level (CAL), radiographic bone loss (RBL) and mucosal recession (MR). Results: Twelve articles met the inclusion criteria. Two principal treatment modalities were identified; mechanical debridement and laser therapy, with two adjunctive therapies antimicrobial and antiseptic agents. Non‐surgical interventions (ultrasonic scalers, Er:YAG laser and powdered air‐abrasive devices) showed significant clinical improvement in the short term (<3 months). Clinical benefit was demonstrated with the adjunctive use of antimicrobial agents in the short term but diminished with time. Antiseptic agents alone have no significant effect. Non‐surgical therapies applied in these studies failed to arrest mucosal recession, peri‐implant bone loss or reduce the counts of viable pathogens in the long term. Conclusion: The evidence demonstrate that the clinical parameters of peri‐implantitis, i.e. BOP, PPD and CAL may all be improved by simple mechanical debridement, using either ultrasonic instrumentation or Er:YAG laser therapy; adjunctive antimicrobial and antiseptic therapy. Further randomised control trials in this area are, however, required