12 research outputs found

    Choosing and Using a Plant DNA Barcode

    Get PDF
    The main aim of DNA barcoding is to establish a shared community resource of DNA sequences that can be used for organismal identification and taxonomic clarification. This approach was successfully pioneered in animals using a portion of the cytochrome oxidase 1 (CO1) mitochondrial gene. In plants, establishing a standardized DNA barcoding system has been more challenging. In this paper, we review the process of selecting and refining a plant barcode; evaluate the factors which influence the discriminatory power of the approach; describe some early applications of plant barcoding and summarise major emerging projects; and outline tool development that will be necessary for plant DNA barcoding to advance

    Brazilian guidelines for the clinical management of paracoccidioidomycosis

    Full text link

    Glycolipid Sensing and Innate Immunity in Paracoccidioidomycosis

    No full text
    Distinct glycolipid profiles are described in microorganisms, which have been shown to modulate the innate immune system. We tested the hypothesis that glycosphingolipids from Paracoccidioides brasiliensis have immunomodulatory properties on monocytes and dendritic cells of two groups of healthy individuals, one cured of paracoccidioidomycosis in the past (CUR-I) and the other nonexposed to P. brasiliensis (HNE-I). Two classes of glycosphingolipids purified from yeast cells were evaluated: a neutral glycosphingolipid, monohexosylceramide (CMH), and acidic glycosylinositolphosphorylceramides (GIPCs). Both glycosphingolipids affected the functioning of innate immunity cells, interfering with the antigen presenting process: P. brasiliensis yeast cells phagocytosis, IL-10 secretion, and costimulatory molecules and recognition receptors expression by monocytes were altered, while dendritic cell antigen presentation to autologous T cells was markedly down-modulated as shown by reduced T-cell proliferative responses. the mechanisms by which CMH and GIPCs exert their effects differ since the target cells did not always respond similarly to the challenge with the glycosphingolipids. Moreover, CUR-I and HNE-I presented different responses to the glycosphingolipids. Differences not only in the glycosphingolipid structure (such as the polar head group or the ceramide moiety), but also in the innate immunity properties of CUR-I and HNE-I, may underlie these differences and contribute to individual's susceptibility or resistance to develop paracoccidioidomycosis.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Univ São Paulo, Sch Med, Lab Med Invest, Div Clin Dermatol,Unit 53, BR-05403000 São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Div Glycoconjugate Immunochem, Dept Biochem, São Paulo Med Sch, São Paulo, BrazilUNESP, Fac Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Clin Anal, Araraquara, BrazilUniv São Paulo, Lab Med Invest, Unit 53, Inst Trop Med, BR-05403000 São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Div Glycoconjugate Immunochem, Dept Biochem, São Paulo Med Sch, São Paulo, BrazilFAPESP: 07/58598-8FAPESP: 07/58462-9Web of Scienc
    corecore