A Novel NFIX-STAT6 Gene Fusion in Solitary Fibrous Tumor: A Case Report

Solitary fibrous tumor is a rare subtype of soft-tissue sarcoma with a wide spectrum of histopathological features and clinical behaviors, ranging from mildly to highly aggressive tumors. The defining genetic driver alteration is the gene fusion NAB2–STAT6, resulting from a paracentric inversion within chromosome 12q, and involving several different exons in each gene. STAT6 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 6) nuclear immunostaining and/or the identification of NAB2–STAT6 gene fusion is required for the diagnostic confirmation of solitary fibrous tumor. In the present study, a new gene fusion consisting of Nuclear Factor I X (NFIX), mapping to 19p13.2 and STAT6, mapping to 12q13.3 was identified by targeted RNA-Seq in a 74-year-old female patient diagnosed with a deep-seated solitary fibrous tumor in the pelvis. Histopathologically, the neoplasm did not display nuclear pleomorphism or tumor necrosis and had a low proliferative index. A total of 378 unique reads spanning the NFIXexon8–STAT6exon2 breakpoint with 55 different start sites were detected in the bioinformatic analysis, which represented 59.5% of the reads intersecting the genomic location on either side of the breakpoint. Targeted RNA-Seq results were validated by RT-PCR/ Sanger sequencing. The identification of a new gene fusion partner for STAT6 in solitary fibrous tumor opens intriguing new hypotheses to refine the role of STAT6 in the sarcomatogenesis of this entity

A comprehensive review on solitary fibrous tumor: New insights for new horizons

[Simple Summary] Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is a malignant condition that exhibits different clinical behaviors ranging from low to high aggressive SFT, with dedifferentiated SFT (DD-SFT) being the fastest-growing subtype. Even when surgery alone provides curation rates above 60%, recurrences do occur in a fraction of patients where surgery is unable to provide disease control. Among the systemic therapeutic options, antiangiogenic compounds have shown higher efficacy than chemotherapy by indirect comparisons. Furthermore, rotating different antiangiogenics, at the progression time, has been shown to be effective. The exception is DD-SFT since it is resistant to antiangiogenics but can respond to chemotherapy. This comprehensive review also analyzes the underlying molecular components that play a key role in SFT origin and aggressiveness. The discovery in 2013 of anomalous fusion genes between NAB2 and STAT6 was determinant to increase the knowledge on the molecular drivers in SFT that could be potential targets for future therapies.Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is a rare mesenchymal, ubiquitous tumor, with an incidence of 1 new case/million people/year. In the 2020 WHO classification, risk stratification models were recommended as a better tool to determine prognosis in SFT, to the detriment of “typical” or “malignant” classic terms. The risk for metastasis is up to 35–45%, or even greater, in series with a longer follow-up. Over the last few decades, advances in immunohistochemistry and molecular diagnostics identified STAT6 nuclear protein expression and the NAB2–STAT6 fusion gene as more precise tools for SFT diagnosis. Recent evidence taken from retrospective series and from two prospective phase II clinical trials showed that antiangiogenics are active and their sequential use from first line should be considered, except for dedifferentiated SFT for which chemotherapy is the best option. Since the fusion transcript driver’s first description in 2013, new insights have been brought on key molecular events in SFT. This comprehensive review mainly focuses on the superior efficacy of antiangiogenics over chemotherapeutic agents in SFT, provides the current knowledge of key molecules that could co-drive the SFT behavior, and suggests new target candidates that deserve to be explored in preclinical and clinical research in SFT.The authors would also like to thank the SELNET project. SELNET has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No 825806. Furthermore, the authors would like to thank the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII)—Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER), project reference PI18/01728. David S. Moura is the recipient of a Sara Borrell postdoctoral fellowship funded by the National Institute of Health Carlos III (ISCIII) (CD20/00155). José L. Mondaza-Hernandez is the recipient of a PFIS predoctoral fellowship funded by the National Institute of Health Carlos III (ISCIII) (FI19/00184)

Cancer Stem Cells in Soft-Tissue Sarcomas

This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Stem Cells and Resistance to Therapy.Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a rare group of mesenchymal solid tumors with heterogeneous genetic profiles and clinical features. Systemic chemotherapy is the backbone treatment for advanced STS; however, STS frequently acquire resistance to standard therapies, which highlights the need to improve treatments and identify novel therapeutic targets. Increases in the knowledge of the molecular pathways that drive sarcomas have brought to light different molecular alterations that cause tumor initiation and progression. These findings have triggered a breakthrough of targeted therapies that are being assessed in clinical trials. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) exhibit mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) features and represent a subpopulation of tumor cells that play an important role in tumor progression, chemotherapy resistance, recurrence and metastasis. In fact, CSCs phenotypes have been identified in sarcomas, allied to drug resistance and tumorigenesis. Herein, we will review the published evidence of CSCs in STS, discussing the molecular characteristic of CSCs, the commonly used isolation techniques and the new possibilities of targeting CSCs as a way to improve STS treatment and consequently patient outcome

Efficacy of Eribulin Plus Gemcitabine Combination in L-Sarcomas

Although the overall survival of advanced soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) patients has increased in recent years, the median progression-free survival is lower than 5 months, meaning that there is an unmet need in this population. Among second-line treatments for advanced STS, eribulin is an anti-microtubule agent that has been approved for liposarcoma. Here, we tested the combination of eribulin with gemcitabine in preclinical models of L-sarcoma. The effect in cell viability was measured by MTS and clonogenic assay. Cell cycle profiling was studied by flow cytometry, while apoptosis was measured by flow cytometry and Western blotting. The activity of eribulin plus gemcitabine was evaluated in in vivo patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. In L-sarcoma cell lines, eribulin plus gemcitabine showed to be synergistic, increasing the number of hypodiploid events (increased subG1 population) and the accumulation of DNA damage. In in vivo PDX models of L-sarcomas, eribulin combined with gemcitabine was a viable scheme, delaying tumour growth after one cycle of treatment, being more effective in leiomyosarcoma. The combination of eribulin and gemcitabine was synergistic in L-sarcoma cultures and it showed to be active in in vivo studies. This combination deserves further exploration in the clinical context

CUL4A, ERCC5, and ERCC1 as Predictive Factors for Trabectedin Efficacy in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas (STS): A Spanish Group for Sarcoma Research (GEIS) Study

A translational study was designed to analyze the expression of nucleotide excision repair (NER) and homologous recombination (HR) genes as potential predictive biomarkers for trabectedin in soft-tissue sarcoma (STS). This study is part of a randomized phase II trial comparing trabectedin plus doxorubicin versus doxorubicin in advanced STS. Gene expression levels were evaluated by qRT-PCR, while CUL4A protein levels were quantified by immunohistochemistry. Expression levels were correlated with patients’ progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Gene expression was also evaluated in cell lines and correlated with trabectedin sensitivity. In doxorubicin arm and in the whole series, which includes samples from both arms, no significant differences in terms of PFS were observed amongst the analyzed genes. In the group treated with trabectedin plus doxorubicin, the median of PFS was significantly longer in cases with CUL4A, ERCC1, or ERCC5 overexpression, while BRCA1 expression did not correlated with PFS. Gene expression had no prognostic influence in OS. CUL4A protein levels correlated with worse PFS in doxorubicin arm and in the whole series. In cell lines, only overexpression of ERCC1 was significantly correlated with trabectedin sensitivity. In conclusion, CUL4A, ERCC5, and mainly ERCC1 acted as predictive factors for trabectedin efficacy in advanced STS