2 research outputs found

    How much can Mexican healthcare providers learn about breastfeeding through a semi-virtual training? A propensity score matching analysis

    Get PDF
    Background: Mexico has shown a worrisome decrease in breastfeeding indicators, especially in the lowest socioeconomic level. Improving breastfeeding protection, promotion, and support services through workforce development is a key area of intervention. The objective of this study is to assess the influence on breastfeeding knowledge and abilities of a semi-virtual training for primary healthcare providers assisting beneficiaries of PROSPERA in Mexico, which is one of the largest conditional cash-transfer programs in the world. Methods: Two independent cross-sectional samples of healthcare providers were drawn at baseline and post-intervention in three states of Mexico. Baseline data were collected among primary physicians, registered nurses and nurse technicians (i.e. unit of analysis) on July 2016 (n = 529) and post-training between March and April 2017 (n = 211). A 19-item telephone questionnaire assessed providers\u27 general knowledge about breastfeeding, breastfeeding benefits and clinical aspects of breastfeeding, clinical ability to solve problems and abilities to overcome breastfeeding challenges. The effects of the training were assessed through a propensity score matching (PSM) stratified by types of providers (i.e. physicians, registered nurses, nurse technicians). Results: The PSM analysis showed significant improvements among all providers in the general knowledge about breastfeeding (around 20 percentage points [pp]) and knowledge about breastfeeding benefits (approximately 50 pp). In addition, physicians improved their knowledge about clinical aspects of breastfeeding (7 pp), while registered nurses improved in their ability to solve breastfeeding problems (14 pp) and in helping mothers overcome breastfeeding challenges (12 pp). Conclusions: Promoting a breastfeeding enabling environment in Mexico to improve breastfeeding rates will require improving the knowledge and skills of healthcare providers. While a semi-virtual training showed large improvements in knowledge, developing skills among providers may require a more intensive approach

    The yearly financing need of providing paid maternity leave in the informal sector in Indonesia

    Get PDF
    Background: The economic cost of not breastfeeding in Indonesia is estimated at US1.5–9.4billionannually,thehighestinSouthEastAsia.Halfofthe33.6millionworkingwomenofreproductiveage(WRA)inIndonesia(15–49years)areinformalemployees,meaningtheyareworkingascasualworkersortheyareself−employed(smallscalebusiness)andassistedbyunpaid/familyworker(s).NospecificmaternityprotectionentitlementsarecurrentlyavailableforWRAworkinginformallyinIndonesia.Thisstudyaimstoestimatethefinancingneedofprovidingmaternityleavecashtransfer(MCT)forWRAworkingintheinformalsectorinIndonesia.Method:ThecostingmethodologyusedistheadaptedversionoftheWorldBankmethodologybyVilar−Compteetal,followingpre−setstepstoestimatecostsusingnationalsecondarydata.Weusedthe2018IndonesianNationalSocio−EconomicSurveytoestimatethenumberofwomenworkinginformallywhogavebirthwithinthelastyear.Thepopulationcovered,potentialcashtransfer’sunitarycost,theincrementalcoverageofthepolicyintermsoftimeandcoverage,andtheadministrativecostswereusedtoestimatethecostofMCTfortheinformalsector.Result:At1001.5–9.4 billion annually, the highest in South East Asia. Half of the 33.6 million working women of reproductive age (WRA) in Indonesia (15–49 years) are informal employees, meaning they are working as casual workers or they are self-employed (small scale business) and assisted by unpaid/family worker(s). No specific maternity protection entitlements are currently available for WRA working informally in Indonesia. This study aims to estimate the financing need of providing maternity leave cash transfer (MCT) for WRA working in the informal sector in Indonesia. Method: The costing methodology used is the adapted version of the World Bank methodology by Vilar-Compte et al, following pre-set steps to estimate costs using national secondary data. We used the 2018 Indonesian National Socio-Economic Survey to estimate the number of women working informally who gave birth within the last year. The population covered, potential cash transfer’s unitary cost, the incremental coverage of the policy in terms of time and coverage, and the administrative costs were used to estimate the cost of MCT for the informal sector. Result: At 100% coverage for 13 weeks of leave, the yearly financing need of MCT ranged from US175million (US152/woman)toUS152/woman) to US669million (US$583/woman). The share of the yearly financing need did not exceed 0.5% of Indonesian Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Conclusions: The yearly financing need of providing MCT for eligible WRA working in the informal sector is economically attractive as it amounts to less than 0.5% of GDP nominal of Indonesia. While such a program would be perceived as a marked increase from current public health spending at the onset, such an investment could substantially contribute to the success of breastfeeding and substantial corresponding public health savings given that more than half of working Indonesian WRA are employed in the informal sector. Such policies should be further explored while taking into consideration realistic budget constraints and implementation capacity
    corecore