36 research outputs found

    The Formation of Endoderm-Derived Taste Sensory Organs Requires a <i>Pax9</i>-Dependent Expansion of Embryonic Taste Bud Progenitor Cells

    No full text
    <div><p>In mammals, taste buds develop in different regions of the oral cavity. Small epithelial protrusions form fungiform papillae on the ectoderm-derived dorsum of the tongue and contain one or few taste buds, while taste buds in the soft palate develop without distinct papilla structures. In contrast, the endoderm-derived circumvallate and foliate papillae located at the back of the tongue contain a large number of taste buds. These taste buds cluster in deep epithelial trenches, which are generated by intercalating a period of epithelial growth between initial placode formation and conversion of epithelial cells into sensory cells. How epithelial trench formation is genetically regulated during development is largely unknown. Here we show that <i>Pax9</i> acts upstream of <i>Pax1</i> and <i>Sox9</i> in the expanding taste progenitor field of the mouse circumvallate papilla. While a reduced number of taste buds develop in a growth-retarded circumvallate papilla of <i>Pax1</i> mutant mice, its development arrests completely in <i>Pax9</i>-deficient mice. In addition, the <i>Pax9</i> mutant circumvallate papilla trenches lack expression of K8 and <i>Prox1</i> in the taste bud progenitor cells, and gradually differentiate into an epidermal-like epithelium. We also demonstrate that taste placodes of the soft palate develop through a <i>Pax9</i>-dependent induction. Unexpectedly, <i>Pax9</i> is dispensable for patterning, morphogenesis and maintenance of taste buds that develop in ectoderm-derived fungiform papillae. Collectively, our data reveal an endoderm-specific developmental program for the formation of taste buds and their associated papilla structures. In this pathway, <i>Pax9</i> is essential to generate a pool of taste bud progenitors and to maintain their competence towards prosensory cell fate induction.</p></div

    FUP maintenance and FUP taste bud renewal do not require Pax9 functions.

    No full text
    <p>All analyses were carried out using 3–5 months old mice. (<b>A,B</b>) Pax9 immunostaining of FUPs. In <i>Pax9<sup>fl/fl</sup></i> mice (A), Pax9 expression is detected in the FUP epithelium and in isolated taste bud cells (area of taste bud is indicated by dotted line). (B) No Pax9-positive cells are detectable in the FUP after <i>K14<sup>Cre</sup></i>-mediated recombination of <i>Pax9<sup>fl/fl</sup></i>. (<b>C,D</b>) Histological sections of FUP. <i>Pax9<sup>fl/fl</sup></i> FUP (C) and <i>K14<sup>Cre</sup></i>;<i>Pax9<sup>fl/fl</sup></i> FUP (D) are morphologically indistinguishable. (<b>E,F</b>) Scanning electron microscopy images of FUP. The FUP of both <i>Pax9<sup>fl/fl</sup></i> (E) and <i>K14<sup>Cre</sup></i>;<i>Pax9<sup>fl/fl</sup></i> (F) form taste pores (arrowhead), whereas the non-sensory FIP of the mutants (F) are hypoplastic. (<b>G–L</b>) Indirect immunofluorescent detection of keratins. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). (G) In <i>Pax9<sup>fl/fl</sup></i> mice, K14 is expressed in basal cells of the epithelium and K1 expression was seen in isolated epithelial cells of the FUP epithelium (arrowhead). (H) While K14 expression was not affected in the FUP of <i>K14<sup>Cre</sup></i>;<i>Pax9<sup>fl/fl</sup></i> mice, the number K1 expressing cells was strongly increased. (<b>I,J</b>) K10 expression is mainly restricted to the apical end of the FUP in <i>Pax9<sup>fl/fl</sup></i> mice (I) whereas its expression is more extended in <i>K14<sup>Cre</sup></i>;<i>Pax9<sup>fl/fl</sup></i> mice (J). (<b>K,L</b>) K8 expression marks taste bud cells in both genotypes. (<b>M,N</b>) Immunohistochemical staining showing that Sox2 is expressed in mature taste buds of both <i>Pax9<sup>fl/fl</sup></i> (M) and <i>K14<sup>Cre</sup></i>;<i>Pax9<sup>fl/fl</sup></i> (N) mice. Scale bars: 50 µm in A,C,G,M; 500 µm in E.</p

    <i>Pax1</i> and <i>Sox9</i> are <i>Pax9</i> targets in the proliferating compartment of the CVP trenches.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>A–F</b>) Immunohistochemical staining on sections of the CVP at E15.5. (<b>A,B</b>) Pax1 is strongly expressed in the tips of epithelial trenches and in periderm cells covering the central dome of the wild type CVP (A), but not in the <i>Pax9</i>-deficient CVP (B). (<b>C,D</b>) Similarly, Sox9 expression is strongest in the epithelial trenches (C) and is barely detectable in the <i>Pax9</i> mutant CVP (D). (<b>E,F</b>) BrdU-positive cells were counted in defined areas (boxed) of the CVP trenches from three wild type (n = 29 sections) and three <i>Pax9</i> mutant CVPs (n = 28 sections). (<b>G</b>) The number of proliferating cells in the <i>Pax9</i>-deficient CVP is significantly reduced. Error bars illustrate standard deviation. (<b>H</b>) Pax1 immunostaining of one CVP trench in a 3 months old wild type mouse. (<b>I,J</b>) Morphology of the CVP at E18.5. The lengths of the CVP trenches (indicated by bars) were measured and shown to be reduced in the absence of <i>Pax1</i> (for summary of measurements see <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004709#pgen.1004709.s009" target="_blank">Table S1</a>). (<b>K,L</b>) Morphology of the CVP at postnatal day 16. In <i>Pax1</i> mutants (n = 3) the trenches are growth-retarded and contain fewer taste buds. Scale bars: 50 µm in A,C,E; 100 µm in H,I,K.</p

    Absence of <i>Pax9</i> causes an endoderm-specific disruption of the Shh pathway in taste papillae.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>A–F</b>) Whole mount in situ hybridization of <i>Shh</i>, its receptor (<i>Ptc1</i>) and the downstream effector transcription factor (<i>Gli1</i>) at E14.5. (<b>A,B</b>) In the wild type CVP (A), <i>Shh</i> is expressed in the central dome as well as in a ring of accessory papillae (arrowheads). <i>Ptc1</i> and <i>Gli</i> are expressed in a similar pattern. In the absence of <i>Pax9</i>, <i>Shh</i>, <i>Ptc1</i> and <i>Gli1</i> are only expressed in the central dome of the CVP (B). (<b>C,D</b>) In wild type embryos (C), patches of <i>Shh</i>, <i>Ptc1</i> and <i>Gli1</i> expression are detectable in the region of the developing FOP, whereas these expression patterns are missing (<i>Shh</i>) or are greatly reduced (<i>Ptc1</i>, <i>Gli1</i>) in <i>Pax9<sup>−/−</sup></i> embryos (D). (<b>E,F</b>) <i>Shh</i> expression in FUP placodes is similar in wild type (E) and <i>Pax9</i>-deficient (F) embryos. (<b>G, H</b>) Histological sections of <i>Pax9</i>-deficient, cultured embryonic tongues. (G) In control medium the <i>Pax9<sup>−/−</sup></i> CVP of cultured tongues is small and is not visible externally (inset). (H) In the presence of purmorphamine (PUR) the number of epithelial cells is increased in the dome of the CVP. Note the absence of trenches. Inset shows enlarged, protruded CVP dome (arrowhead) of the cultured tongue. Scale bars: 100 µm in A,C,G: 200 µm in E.</p

    Expression patterns of Pax9 in different taste papillae of the embryonic mouse tongue.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>A</b>) Drawing showing the localization of the circumvallate papilla (CVP), foliate papillae (FOP), and fungiform papillae (FUP) in the mouse tongue. (<b>B</b>) Whole mount X-Gal staining of a <i>Pax9<sup>+/LacZ</sup></i> mouse tongue at embryonic day 13.5 (E13.5). Note that expression is also seen in the mesenchyme adjacent to the developing FOP (arrowheads) and that the color reaction was stopped before epithelial staining began to obscure the mesenchymal expression domain. (<b>C–N</b>) Pax9 immunostaining of taste papillae during development on cross sections (C–F; K–N) and horizontal sections of the tongue (G–J). (<b>C–F</b>) Pax9 is expressed in the epithelium during CVP morphogenesis and is down-regulated in some regions of the trenches at E18.5 (arrowhead in F). (<b>G–J</b>) In addition to the epithelium, Pax9 is also expressed in the mesenchyme during FOP development, while reduced Pax9 levels were observed in the trenches at E18.5 (arrowhead in J). (<b>K–N</b>) In the anterior part of the tongue Pax9 is expressed in the FUP epithelium and in filiform papillae (FIP). Note that the expression is very weak or absent in the taste placodes (arrowheads). Scale bars: 200 µm in B; 50 µm in other panels.</p

    Arrest of CVP and FOP development in <i>Pax9</i>-deficient mouse embryos.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>A,C</b>) In wild type (WT) embryos, the invaginating CVP epithelium forms deep trenches. (<b>B,D</b>) Rudimentary CVP trenches form in <i>Pax9<sup>−/−</sup></i> embryos at E16.5 (B) but these trenches fail to invaginate (D). (<b>E,G</b>) A series of invaginations develop in the FOP of wild type embryos. (<b>F,H</b>) FOP trenches are absent in <i>Pax9</i> mutants. (<b>I–L</b>) FUP development on the dorsal tongue. The FUP of wild type embryos (I,K) and <i>Pax9<sup>−/−</sup></i> embryos (J,L) are morphologically indistinguishable. (<b>M,N</b>) FOP development in <i>Pax9<sup>fl/fl</sup></i> embryos. (M) Without <i>Cre</i> expression, FOP development at E14.5 is normal and Pax9 expression is detectable in both epithelium and mesenchyme of the tongue (t), as well as in the adjacent lower jaw mesenchyme (arrow; inset shows a coronal section of the posterior region of the tongue). (N) <i>Wnt1<sup>Cre</sup></i>-mediated inactivation of <i>Pax9<sup>fl/fl</sup></i> did not disrupt the formation of epithelial invaginations. Note that Pax9-positive cells are not detectable in the tongue mesenchyme (asterisk in inset) or in the mesenchyme of the non-elevated secondary palate (p). Scale bars: 50 µm.</p

    Development of the arterial roots and ventricular outflow tracts.

    No full text
    The separation of the outflow tract of the developing heart into the systemic and pulmonary arterial channels remains controversial and poorly understood. The definitive outflow tracts have three components. The developing outflow tract, in contrast, has usually been described in two parts. When the tract has exclusively myocardial walls, such bipartite description is justified, with an obvious dogleg bend separating proximal and distal components. With the addition of non-myocardial walls distally, it becomes possible to recognise three parts. The middle part, which initially still has myocardial walls, contains within its lumen a pair of intercalated valvar swellings. The swellings interdigitate with the distal ends of major outflow cushions, formed by the remodelling of cardiac jelly, to form the primordiums of the arterial roots. The proximal parts of the major cushions, occupying the proximal part of the outflow tract, which also has myocardial walls, themselves fuse and muscularise. The myocardial shelf thus formed remodels to become the free-standing subpulmonary infundibulum. Details of all these processes are currently lacking. In this account, we describe the anatomical changes seen during the overall remodelling. Our interpretations are based on the interrogation of serially sectioned histological and high-resolution episcopic microscopy datasets prepared from developing human and mouse embryos, with some of the datasets processed and reconstructed to reveal the specific nature of the tissues contributing to the separation of the outflow channels. Our findings confirm that the tripartite postnatal arrangement can be correlated with the changes occurring during development

    Generation of a null <i>Khdrbs3</i> allele.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Northern analysis of different adult mouse tissues to detect expression of <i>Khdrbs3</i> (upper panel) and small subunit rRNA (lower panel). (B) The genomic structure of the <i>Khdrbs3</i> alleles from wild type, floxed, and null mice mice were monitored using Southern blotting and the probe indicated in parts C–D. The Southern blot demonstrates that the cross with a PGK-Cre mouse successfully removed exon 2 from the genomic DNA. (C) Genomic structure of the <i>Khdrbs3<sup>LoxP</sup></i> conditional allele in which exon 2 of the <i>Khdrbs3</i> gene is flanked by <i>Lox</i>P sites. (D) Genomic structure of the null (<i>Khdrbs3<sup>−</sup></i>) allele from which exon 2 has been deleted by Cre-mediated recombination. (E) Multiplex RT-PCR analysis of <i>Khdrbs3</i> and <i>Hprt</i> mRNA levels in different mouse tissues. The size markers are shown in nucleotides. (F) Western blot analysis of Sam68 and T-STAR protein levels in the testes of wild type and <i>Khdrbs3</i> null mice using an antibody that recognizes T-STAR and Sam68. The position of the size markers are shown in KDa.</p

    T-STAR protein is expressed in the embryonic brain.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Section of embryonic brain (13.5 day embryo) including most of the forebrain region, stained for T-STAR (brown) and counterstained with haematoxylin (blue). (B) <i>Nrxn1-3</i> exon AS4 splicing patterns in wild type and T-STAR knockout 13.5d embryonic brain.</p

    <i>Nrxn</i> exon AS4 alternative splicing control is dependent on the physiological expression of T-STAR protein even though Sam68 is co-expressed.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Immunolocalisation of T-STAR and Sam68 proteins in the mouse hippocampus from wild type or knockout mouse brains (Abbreviations: DG - Dentate Gyrus; and AH -Ammon's Horn). The scale bar is equivalent to 20 µm). (B) Immunolocalisation in the mouse testis. Paraffin embedded adult mouse testis sections were stained with affinity purified antibodies raised against T-STAR or Sam68 (brown staining), and counterstained with haematoxylin (blue). Abbreviations: Spg –spermatogonia; Spc –spermatocyte; Rtd –round spermatid; Spd –elongating spermatid; SC –Sertoli cell. The size bar corresponds to 20 µM. (C) Levels of <i>Nrxn1</i> and <i>Nrxn3</i> AS4 alternative splice isoforms in the testes of different mouse genotypes (n = 3 mice of each genotype) measured by RT-PCR and agarose gel electrophoresis. (D) Quantification of Percentage Splicing Exclusion in the testes of different mouse genotypes using capillary gel electrophoresis (n = 3 mice of each genotype: wild type mice <i>Khdrbs3<sup>+/+</sup></i> (abbreviated WT) <i>Khdrbs3<sup>+/−</sup></i> mice (abbreviated HET) and <i>Khdrbs3<sup>−/−</sup></i> mice (abbreviated KO). The p values were calculated using unpaired t tests, to determine the significance of the difference between percentage splicing exclusion levels in the wild type versus either the heterozygous <i>Khdrbs<sup>+/−</sup></i> mice (HET); or wild type versus the homozygous <i>Khdrbs3<sup>−/−</sup></i> (KO) mice. The standard error of the mean is shown as an error bar.</p
    corecore