Recent trends on techno-economic assessment (TEA) of sugarcane biorefineries

Sustainability challenges, e.g., climate change, resource depletion, and expanding populations, have triggered a swift move towards a circular bio-economy which is expected to evolve progressively in the coming decades. However, the transition from a fossil fuel-based economy to a bio-based economy requires the exploitation of scientific innovations and step changes in the infrastructure of chemical industry. Biorefineries have been extensively investigated for biofuel production from first and second generation feedstocks, whereas some research activities have been conducted on production of biochemical and biopolymers from renewable resources. Techno-economic evaluation of diverse technologies for production of biofuels and biochemical is a crucial step for decision making in the development of bio-economy. This contribution focuses on the economic studies carried out on biorefineries converting sugarcane bagasse, due to its availability and importance in the South African context, into value-added products. Recent studies on biofuel production via biochemical pathway, e.g., ethanol, butanol, or thermochemical pathway, e.g., methanol and bio jet fuel as well as production of biochemicals with high market demands and diverse applications such as lactic acid, succinic acid, and xylitol have been briefly reviewed. In addition, an overview on the production of biopolymers such as polyl-lactic acid and bio-based monomers, i.e., butanediol, from sugarcane bagasse is reported

A critical review on biomass gasification, co-gasification, and their environmental assessments

Gasification is an efficient process to obtain valuable products from biomass with several potential applications, which has received increasing attention over the last decades. Further development of gasification technology requires innovative and economical gasification methods with high efficiencies. Various conventional mechanisms of biomass gasification as well as new technologies are discussed in this paper. Furthermore, co-gasification of biomass and coal as an efficient method to protect the environment by reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions has been comparatively discussed. In fact, the increasing attention to renewable resources is driven by the climate change due to GHG emissions caused by the widespread utilization of conventional fossil fuels, while biomass gasification is considered as a potentially sustainable and environmentally-friendly technology. Nevertheless, social and environmental aspects should also be taken into account when designing such facilities, to guarantee the sustainable use of biomass. This paper also reviews the life cycle assessment (LCA) studies conducted on biomass gasification, considering different technologies and various feedstocks

Life Cycle Assessments of Waste-Based Biorefineries\u2014A Critical Review

In recent years advanced biorefineries based on organic residues and waste have gained increased attention for their potential to obviate first-generation bio-refineries environmental burdens. During the conceptual design phase of an advanced biorefinery the role of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is crucial for providing information on its envi-ronmental performances, better solutions, preferable process setup, more suitable feedstock, trade-off, and so on. This review focuses on advanced biorefineries LCAs in order to accomplish a synthesis of the state-of-the-art from the methodological point of view. Some main methodological issues have been analyzed and discussed on twenty-four LCAs. Attention has been drawn to functional units, system boundaries, invento-ry data collection, allocation methods and multifunctionality management ap-proach. Results show different approaches and solutions to the analyzed aspects but some clear addresses can be pointed out. It has been observed that LCA of biore-fineries can be classified in three different types in base on focal aim, and then functional units are consequentially defined. A large variability has been ob-served regarding system boundaries even if \u201ccradle-to-gate\u201d appears the most common. Inventories are mainly based on secondary data due to the very innova-tive features of the analyzed technologies. No general consensus has been ob-served concerning allocation of environmental impact between co-products