Knowledge and Practices of Colorectal Cancer Early Detection Examinations in Jordan : A Cross Sectional Study

Background: Globally, colorectal cancer (CRC) is ranked the third most common cancer among men and the second in women. The American Cancer Society recommends that starting from the age 50 years, both men and women should be screened for polyps and for early detection of CRC. In Jordan, CRC is the most common cancer among males and the second most common cancer among females. This study aims to assess the knowledge and practices of CRC early detection tests and the barriers and motivators of screening in Jordan. Methods: A semi-structured questionnaire and face-to-face interviews were conducted with 300 males and 300 females recruited using stratified clustered random sampling technique from four governorates in Jordan. The participants were aged 30 to 65 years, without a previous history of CRC. Descriptive and multivariate analyses were used to assess knowledge and practices of CRC early detection tests. Results: Overall, there were poor knowledge and practices of CRC early detection tests. Better knowledge and practices were significantly associated with previously consulting a doctor due to symptoms and worries from CRC, receiving a recommendation from a doctor to perform CRC testing, or having more knowledge about CRC signs and symptoms (p≤ 0.05). Conclusions: This study indicates that there is a need for raising awareness about CRC early detection tests in Jordan, especially among those aged 50 years and above, and those who have a family history of CRC. Additionally, it is important to educate and encourage physicians to recommend CRC screening to patients that are at higher risk of the disease

Diagnostic yield of electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy

Objectives: Peripheral lung nodules (PLNs) are a common and diagnostically challenging finding. Electronavigational bronchoscopy (ENB) is used to increase the diagnostic yield and is considered safe. Multiple factors have been correlated with a better diagnostic yield. We sought to assess the effect of nodule characteristics and prior workup on the diagnostic yield in ENB. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of 98 ENB procedures in a community referral center. Two investigators reviewed patients’ charts and images independently. Multiple logistic regression analyses was used to determine if factors such as bronchus sign, ground glass opacification (GGO), distance from pleura, prior use of endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) and positron emission tomography (PET) had an impact on the diagnostic yield. Results: We evaluated 98 ENBs performed in 92 patients. Most of the lesions were in the upper lobes. The diagnostic yield was 60%. A PET scan was performed prior to ENB in 47% of cases. EBUS was performed in 24% of cases. Bronchus sign was present in 60% of cases and GGO in only 6% of nodules. The odds ratio for diagnostic yield with a bronchus sign was 1.89 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83–4.33] and with nodules showing GGO characteristics it was 4.51 (95% CI: 0.51–39.68). Pneumothorax occurred in 6% of cases. Conclusion: In our cohort, diagnostic yield was 60% with a 6% pneumothorax rate. A suggestive trend for the presence of bronchus sign on computed tomography scan, albeit statistically nonsignificant, as a predictor for improved diagnostic yield needs to be validated in a larger cohort

Outcomes after cardiac arrest in Medical Intensive Care Unit: A propensity score matching analysis of COVID-19 MICU vs non COVID-19 MICU cardiac arrest.

AIM: To assess whether there were differences in resuscitation efforts and outcomes for medical intensive care unit (MICU) in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) during the COVID-19 pandemic when compared to pre-pandemic. METHODS: Comparing COVID-19 MICU-IHCA patients (03/2020 to 10/2020) to non-COVID-19 MICU IHCA (01/2014 to 12/2018) at Clevleand Clinic Health System (CCHS) of NE Ohio. Propensity score matching analysis (PSMA) was used to create comparable groups. RESULTS: There were a total of 516 patients, 51 in COVID-19 MICU IHCA cohort and 465 in the non-COVID-19 MICU IHCA cohort. The mean (SD) age of the study population was 60.9 (16) years and 56% were males. In 92.1% (n = 475) patients, initial arrest rhythm was non-shockable. At the time of ICU admission, compared to the non-COVID-19 MICU-IHCA cohort, the COVID-19 MICU IHCA cohort had a lower mean APACHE III score (70 [32.9] vs 101.3 [39.6], P = <0.01). The COVID-19 cohort had a higher rate of survival to hospital discharge (12 [23.5%] vs 59 [12.7%], P = 0.03). Upon PSMA, the algorithm selected 40 COVID-19 patients and 200 non-COVID-19 patients. Imbalances in baseline characteristics, comorbidities, and APACHE III were well-balanced after matching. Survival rate after matching became non-significant; (10 [25%] vs 42 [21%], P = 0.67). Further, there were no significant differences in ICU or hospital length-of-stay or neurological outcomes at discharge for survivors in the two matched cohorts. CONCLUSION: It is imperative that COVID-19 patients receive unbiased and unrestricted resuscitation measures, without any discouragement