Polymyxin-B hemoperfusion in septic patients: analysis of a multicenter registry

Background: In 2010, the EUPHAS 2 collaborative group created a registry with the purpose of recording data from critically ill patients suffering from severe sepsis and septic shock treated with polymyxin-B hemoperfusion (PMX-HP) for endotoxin removal. The aim of the registry was to verify the application of PMX-HP in the daily clinical practice. Methods: The EUPHAS 2 registry involved 57 centers between January 2010 and December 2014, collecting retrospective data of 357 patients (297 in Europe and 60 in Asia) suffering from severe sepsis and septic shock caused by proved or suspected infection related to Gram negative bacteria. All patients received atleast one cycle of extracorporeal endotoxin removal by PMX-HP. Results: Septic shock was diagnosed in 305 (85.4\ua0%) patients. The most common source of infection was abdominal (44.0\ua0%) followed by pulmonary (17.6\ua0%). Gram negative bacteria represented 60.6\ua0% of the pathogens responsible of infection. After 72\ua0h from the first cycle of PMX-HP, some of the SOFA score components significantly improved with respect to baseline: cardiovascular (2.16\ua0\ub1\ua01.77 from 3.32\ua0\ub1\ua01.29, p\ua0<\ua00.0001), respiratory (1.95\ua0\ub1\ua00.95 from 2.40\ua0\ub1\ua01.06, p\ua0<\ua00.001) and renal (1.84\ua0\ub1\ua01.77 from 2.23\ua0\ub1\ua01.62, p\ua0=\ua00.013). Overall 28-day survival rate was 54.5\ua0% (60.4\ua0% in abdominal and 47.5\ua0% in pulmonary infection). Patients with abdominal infection treated with PMX-HP within 24\ua0h from the diagnosis of septic shock had a 28-day survival rate of 64.5\ua0%. Patients showing a significantly cardiovascular improvement after PMX-HP had a 28-survival rate of 75\ua0% in comparison to the 39\ua0% of patients who did not (p\ua0<\ua00.001). Cox regression analysis found the variation of cardiovascular, respiratory and coagulation SOFA to be independent covariates for 28-day survival. In European patients were observed a higher 28-day (58.8 vs. 34.5\ua0%, p\ua0=\ua00.003), ICU (59 vs. 36.7\ua0%, p\ua0=\ua00.006) and hospital survival rate (53.2 vs. 35\ua0%, p\ua0=\ua00.02) than in Asian patients. However, the two populations were highly heterogeneous in terms of source of infection and severity scores at admission. Conclusion: The EUPHAS 2 is the largest registry conducted outside Japan on the clinical use of PMX-HP in septic patients. Data analysis confirmed the feasibility of PMX-HP to treat septic patients in daily clinical practice, showing clinical benefits associated with endotoxin removal without significant adverse events related to the extracorporeal technique. \ua9 2016, The Author(s)

Prosafe: a european endeavor to improve quality of critical care medicine in seven countries

BACKGROUND: long-lasting shared research databases are an important source of epidemiological information and can promote comparison between different healthcare services. Here we present ProsaFe, an advanced international research network in intensive care medicine, with the focus on assessing and improving the quality of care. the project involved 343 icUs in seven countries. all patients admitted to the icU were eligible for data collection. MetHoDs: the ProsaFe network collected data using the same electronic case report form translated into the corresponding languages. a complex, multidimensional validation system was implemented to ensure maximum data quality. individual and aggregate reports by country, region, and icU type were prepared annually. a web-based data-sharing system allowed participants to autonomously perform different analyses on both own data and the entire database. RESULTS: The final analysis was restricted to 262 general ICUs and 432,223 adult patients, mostly admitted to Italian units, where a research network had been active since 1991. organization of critical care medicine in the seven countries was relatively similar, in terms of staffing, case mix and procedures, suggesting a common understanding of the role of critical care medicine. conversely, icU equipment differed, and patient outcomes showed wide variations among countries. coNclUsioNs: ProsaFe is a permanent, stable, open access, multilingual database for clinical benchmarking, icU self-evaluation and research within and across countries, which offers a unique opportunity to improve the quality of critical care. its entry into routine clinical practice on a voluntary basis is testimony to the success and viability of the endeavor