Virus Movements on the Plasma Membrane Support Infection and Transmission between Cells

How viruses are transmitted across the mucosal epithelia of the respiratory, digestive, or excretory tracts, and how they spread from cell to cell and cause systemic infections, is incompletely understood. Recent advances from single virus tracking experiments have revealed conserved patterns of virus movements on the plasma membrane, including diffusive motions, drifting motions depending on retrograde flow of actin filaments or actin tail formation by polymerization, and confinement to submicrometer areas. Here, we discuss how viruses take advantage of cellular mechanisms that normally drive the movements of proteins and lipids on the cell surface. A concept emerges where short periods of fast diffusive motions allow viruses to rapidly move over several micrometers. Coupling to actin flow supports directional transport of virus particles during entry and cell-cell transmission, and local confinement coincides with either nonproductive stalling or infectious endocytic uptake. These conserved features of virus–host interactions upstream of infectious entry offer new perspectives for anti-viral interference

High-Dose Rifapentine with Moxifloxacin for Pulmonary Tuberculosis

BackgroundTuberculosis regimens that are shorter and simpler than the current 6-month daily regimen are needed.MethodsWe randomly assigned patients with newly diagnosed, smear-positive, drug-sensitive tuberculosis to one of three regimens: a control regimen that included 2 months of ethambutol, isoniazid, rifampicin, and pyrazinamide administered daily followed by 4 months of daily isoniazid and rifampicin; a 4-month regimen in which the isoniazid in the control regimen was replaced by moxifloxacin administered daily for 2 months followed by moxifloxacin and 900 mg of rifapentine administered twice weekly for 2 months; or a 6-month regimen in which isoniazid was replaced by daily moxifloxacin for 2 months followed by one weekly dose of both moxifloxacin and 1200 mg of rifapentine for 4 months. Sputum specimens were examined on microscopy and after culture at regular intervals. The primary end point was a composite treatment failure and relapse, with noninferiority based on a margin of 6 percentage points and 90% confidence intervals.ResultsWe enrolled a total of 827 patients from South Africa, Zimbabwe, Botswana, and Zambia; 28% of patients were coinfected with the human immunodefiency virus. In the per-protocol analysis, the proportion of patients with an unfavorable response was 4.9% in the control group, 3.2% in the 6-month group (adjusted difference from control, -1.8 percentage points; 90% confidence interval [CI], -6.1 to 2.4), and 18.2% in the 4-month group (adjusted difference from control, 13.6 percentage points; 90% CI, 8.1 to 19.1). In the modified intention-to-treat analysis these proportions were 14.4% in the control group, 13.7% in the 6-month group (adjusted difference from control, 0.4 percentage points; 90% CI, -4.7 to 5.6), and 26.9% in the 4-month group (adjusted difference from control, 13.1 percentage points; 90% CI, 6.8 to 19.4).ConclusionsThe 6-month regimen that included weekly administration of high-dose rifapentine and moxifloxacin was as effective as the control regimen. The 4-month regimen was not noninferior to the control regimen. (Funded by the European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership and the Wellcome Trust; RIFAQUIN Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN44153044.)

Inhibition of Anchorage-independent Growth of Transformed NIH3T3 Cells by Epithelial Protein Lost in Neoplasm (EPLIN) Requires Localization of EPLIN to Actin Cytoskeleton

Epithelial protein lost in neoplasm (EPLIN) is a cytoskeleton-associated protein characterized by the presence of a single centrally located lin-11, isl-1, and mec-3 (LIM) domain. We have reported previously that EPLIN is down-regulated in transformed cells. In this study, we have investigated whether ectopic expression of EPLIN affects transformation. In untransformed NIH3T3 cells, retroviral-mediated transduction of EPLIN did not alter the cell morphology or growth. NIH3T3 cells expressing EPLIN, however, failed to form colonies when transformed by the activated Cdc42 or the chimeric nuclear oncogene EWS/Fli-1. This suppression of anchorage-independent growth was not universal because EPLIN failed to inhibit the colony formation of Ras-transformed cells. Interestingly, the localization of EPLIN to the actin cytoskeleton was maintained in the EWS/Fli-1– or Cdc42-transformed cells, but not in Ras-transformed cells where it was distributed heterogeneously in the cytoplasm. Using truncated EPLIN constructs, we demonstrated that the NH(2)-terminal region of EPLIN is necessary for both the localization of EPLIN to the actin cytoskeleton and suppression of anchorage-independent growth of EWS/Fli-1–transformed cells. The LIM domain or the COOH-terminal region of EPLIN could be deleted without affecting its cytoskeletal localization or ability to suppress anchorage-dependent growth. Our study indicates EPLIN may function in growth control by associating with and regulating the actin cytoskeleton