43 research outputs found
Π₯Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ° Π»Π΅ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ-ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠΆΠ½ΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΉ Π² ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ΅
This prospective study was carried out in a period of 1 year on the basis of the multifield emergency hospital in the departments of therapy, urology and purulent surgery. On the basis of data of the screening method and the method of spontaneous messages a group of 347 patients with skin reactions, which potentially associated with the intake of medicines was highlighted in. Among them, there were 179 patients with non drug associated skin reactions and 168 patients with drug-induced skin reactions. The most common cutaneous drug reactions (CDR) were: acute urticaria, angioedema; drug toxidermia; allergic dermatitis; hemorrhagic vasculitis. Mostly Π‘DR were caused by the following groups of drugs: b-lactam antibiotics; fluoroquinolones; drugs, improving cerebral blood flow; rentgencontrasting substances.ΠΠ°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ»ΠΎΡΡ Π² ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ 1 Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π° Π½Π° Π±Π°Π·Π΅ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ° Π² ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ
ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ, ΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ Π³Π½ΠΎΠΉΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Ρ
ΠΈΡΡΡΠ³ΠΈΠΈ. ΠΠ° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠΊΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠ½Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Π° ΡΠΏΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π±ΡΠ»Π° Π²ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π° Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ° ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠΌ 347 ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊ Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠΆΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ, ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠΌ Π»Π΅ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ². Π‘ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈ Π½ΠΈΡ
Π±ΡΠ»ΠΎ 179 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² c ΠΊΠΎΠΆΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ, Π½Π΅ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠΌ Π»Π΅ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ² (ΠΠ‘) ΠΈ 168 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ Π»Π΅ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ-ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΆΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ. ΠΠ°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΆΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π»Π΅ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ (ΠΠΠ ) Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ: ΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Ρ ΠΊΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΈΡΠ°, ΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΊ ΠΠ²ΠΈΠ½ΠΊΠ΅; Π»Π΅ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΌΠΈΠΈ; Π°Π»Π»Π΅ΡΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Π΄Π΅ΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡ; Π³Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ°Π³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Π²Π°ΡΠΊΡΠ»ΠΈΡΡ. Π§Π°ΡΠ΅ Π²ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΠΠ Π²ΡΠ·ΡΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈ ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ ΠΠ‘: b-Π»Π°ΠΊΡΠ°ΠΌΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π°Π½ΡΠΈΠ±ΠΈΠΎΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ; ΡΡΠΎΡΡ
ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ½Ρ; ΠΠ‘, ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ·Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠΎΠΊ; ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π²Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π°
Venous thromboembolism in patients with heart failure
This review is focussed on the problem of venous thromboembolism in patients with heart failure (HF). The results of the major clinical trials of antithrombotic therapy in HF patients are presented. The authors discuss comparative effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of unfractionated heparins, low molecular weight heparins, and fondaparinux. The results of the two trials, MAGELLAN and ADOPT, are expected to clarify the clinical potential of such oral anticoagulants as rivaroxaban and apixaban (Factor Xa inhibitors). The problem of low rates e of preventive antithrombotic administration is emphasized
Effects of fluvastatin, valsartan, and their combination on endothelial function in patients with arterial hypertension and dyslipidemia
Aim. To study the effects of an angiotensin II receptor antagonist (ARA II) valsartan, a statin (fluvastatin XL), and their combination on endothelial function (EF) in patients with arterial hypertension (AH) and dyslipidemia (DLP). Material and methods. In total, 30 patients with untreated, non-complicated Stage I-II AH and DLP IIA or IIB were randomised for 8-week monotherapy with valsartan or fluvastatin XL, with the subsequent addition of the second component, fluvastatin XL or valsartan, respectively. Results. Valsartan monotherapy was associated with a reduced increase in linear blood flow velocity (LFV) during the reactive hyperemia test (RHT) - 177,7 +/- 5,8 vs. 170,0 +/- 4,9% (p0,05). Eight-week monotherapy with fluvastatin XL (80 mg/d) was linked to moderate but statistically significant reduction (-2%) in systolic blood pressure (SBP), with no effect on diastolic BP level. In RHT, LFV increase did not change, but EF improved, as manifested in BA EDVD increase. Prolonged combined therapy resulted in further EF improvement. Conclusion. Combined fluvastatin XL and valsartan therapy in patients with untreated Stage I-II AH and DLP IIA or IIB improved EF more effectively than valsartan or fluvastatin XL monotherapy
Venous thromboembolism in patients with heart failure
This review is focussed on the problem of venous thromboembolism in patients with heart failure (HF). The results of the major clinical trials of antithrombotic therapy in HF patients are presented. The authors discuss comparative effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of unfractionated heparins, low molecular weight heparins, and fondaparinux. The results of the two trials, MAGELLAN and ADOPT, are expected to clarify the clinical potential of such oral anticoagulants as rivaroxaban and apixaban (Factor Xa inhibitors). The problem of low rates e of preventive antithrombotic administration is emphasized