Elementos, tipologías constructivas y rehabilitaciones en la colonia Gassol de Bítem

Estudi d'un edifici colonial emblemàtic de les terres de l'Ebre. Identificació dels elements simbólics de l'edifici, tipologies constructives, patologies en l'edifici i repercussió de les intervencions que es van dur a terme en el transcurs dels anys en l'estat actual de l'edifici

Young surgeons’ challenges at the start of their clinical residency: a semi-qualitative study

According to German regulations on licensing to practice medicine, the aim of undergraduate medical training is to produce a scientifically and practically trained physician who is able to work independently. More precisely, medical training has to impart the required knowledge and skills in diagnostics, therapy, health promotion, prevention, and rehabilitation. From the young residents’ point of view, this aim is not achieved, and they do not feel prepared to be a doctor. However, the literature on this subject relies mostly on data based on surveys, and there is a lack of deep analysis of the specific details of the topic. The aim of this study was to analyze in depth how junior doctors in their first and second years felt about their preparation for clinical practice as a doctor from their undergraduate training, as well as which teaching formats and factors influence their preparedness

The effect of written standardized feedback on the structure and quality of surgical lectures: A prospective cohort study

Abstract Background Lectures remain an important teaching method to present and structure knowledge to many students concurrently. Adequate measures are necessary to maintain the quality of the lectures. The aim of this study was to determine the impact on the lecture quality using written structured feedback and to compare the ratings of surgical lectures between students and surgical peers. Methods Prospective analysis of two consecutive surgical lecture series for undergraduate students at Goethe-University Medical School was performed before and after evaluation of the lecturers via independent written feedback from trained undergraduate students and surgeons. The 22-item feedback instrument covered three areas of performance: content, visualization, and delivery. Additional suggestions for improvement were provided from both students and surgical peers who anonymously attended the lectures. The lecturers, experienced surgeons, as well as the student and peer raters were blinded in terms of the aim and content of the study. Their response to the feedback was collected using a web-based 13-item questionnaire. The Kendall’s-W coefficient was computed to calculate inter-rater reliability (IRR). Differences between ratings before and after feedback were analyzed using Student’s t-test for dependent samples. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov-test was used for independent samples. Results A total of 22 lectures from a possible 32 given by 13 lecturers were included and analyzed by at least three surgeons and two students. There were significant improvements in overall score as well as in the details of 9 of the 13 items were found. The average inter-rater reliability was 0.71. There were no differences in the ratings as a function of the rater’s level of expertise (peers vs. students). We found that 13/23 lecturers (56.5%) answered the questionnaire, and 92% strongly agreed that the written feedback was useful. 76.9% of the lecturers revised their lecture based on the written feedback requiring on average 112.5 min (range from 20 to 300 min). Conclusions Overall, this study indicates that structured written feedback provided by trained peers and students that is subsequently discussed by the lecturers concerned is a highly effective and efficient method to improve aspects of lecturing. We anticipate that structured written feedback by trained students that is discussed by the lecturers concerned will improve lecturing

Online Teaching in Surgery

Zusammenfassung Die Gestaltung und Umsetzung von Online-Lehre werden schon seit Langem in der chirurgischen Ausbildung fur das Medizinstudium diskutiert. Sie gewinnt im Zuge der fortschreitenden Digitalisierung und nicht zuletzt aufgrund des aktuellen Pandemiegeschehens eine besondere Bedeutung. Immer drangender stellen sich Fragen zu den Moglichkeiten und Grenzen der Online-Lehre, was sich aktuell unter dem Entwicklungsdruck bereits bewahrt hat, und wie zukunftstrachtige Konzepte gestaltbar sind. Dieser Artikel adressiert die Rahmenbedingungen und die verschiedenen Online-Lehrformate in der Chirurgie und zeigt das Spannungsfeld zwischen technischer Machbarkeit, Umsetzungserfahrungen und didaktischer Zielerreichung auf. Abstract For quite some time, the development and implementation of online teaching has been a controversial issue in surgical education for the degree in medicine. This has become more important with the progression of digitalisation and not least as a result of the current pandemic. It is becoming increasingly urgent to establish the opportunities and limits of online teaching, which has already proved successful under the current developmental pressure, and there are promising concepts. This article addresses the framework and the various online teaching formats in surgery, and illustrates the interplay between technical feasibility, practical experience, and didactic objectives

Undergraduate medical students need more training in craniomaxillofacial surgery: a comparative study between medical and dental students

To compare the performance in oral, craniomaxillofacial, and facial plastic surgery (CMF)-specific surgical skills between medical students (MS) and dental students (DS) and hence adjust the current CMF training to student-specific needs. The investigators hypothesized that there would be no performance differences between MS and DS

Conveying practical clinical skills with the help of teaching associates—a randomised trial with focus on the long term learning retention

Abstract Background Ensuring that all medical students achieve adequate clinical skills remains a challenge, yet the correct performance of clinical skills is critical for all fields of medicine. This study analyzes the influence of receiving feedback by teaching associates in the context of achieving and maintaining a level of expertise in complex head and skull examination. Methods All third year students at a German university who completed the obligatory surgical skills lab training and surgical clerkship participated in this study. The students were randomized into two groups. Control group: lessons by an instructor and peer-based practical skills training. Intervention group: training by teaching associates who are examined as simulation patients and provided direct feedback on student performance. Their competency in short- and long-term competence (directly after intervention and at 4 months after the training) of head and skull examination was measured. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics version 19 (IBM, Armonk, USA). Parametric and non-parametric test methods were applied. As a measurement of correlation, Pearson correlations and correlations via Kendall’s-Tau-b were calculated and Cohen’s d effect size was calculated. Results A total of 181 students were included (90 intervention, 91 control). Out of those 181 students 81 agreed to be videotaped (32 in the control group and 49 in the TA group) and examined at time point 1. At both time points, the intervention group performed the examination significantly better (time point 1, p = <.001; time point 2 (rater 1 p = .009, rater 2 p = .015), than the control group. The effect size (Cohens d) was up to 1.422. Conclusions The use of teaching associates for teaching complex practical skills is effective for short- and long-term retention. We anticipate the method could be easily translated to nearly every patient-based clinical skill, particularly with regards to a competence-based education of future doctors

Epidural Catheterization in Obstetrics: A Checklist-Based Video Assessment of Free Available Video Material

Epidural catheterization has become an indispensable part of modern pain therapy, for example, in obstetrics. Learning how to master this skill is an important competency. Videos are among the information sources with the highest information content for learning such skills. The present study aims to analyze videos regarding epidural catheter placement provided on the YouTube platform based on a validated checklist. An expert workshop selected crucial items for learning epidural catheterization in obstetrics. Items were identified and optimized in a five-step testing process. Using this checklist, videos from YouTube were evaluated by eleven health care professionals. Sixteen videos were identified and analyzed. Concerning the catheterization-specific part of the checklist, only two videos showed satisfactory quality. In the didactic part, eleven out of 21 items reached a mean score &gt;50% of the points. Regarding interrater reliability, the catheterization-specific checklist was shown to be substantial (Fleiss&rsquo; kappa = 0.610), and the didactic part was shown to be fair (Fleiss&rsquo; kappa = 0.401). Overall, standard monitoring and appropriate aseptic technique were followed in only 42% and 49% for the procedure. There was a significant correlation between the runtime and the content quality (p &lt; 0.001). No correlation could be found in terms of platform rating parameters. The video quality varied highly in terms of the requirements of this practical skill. The majority appear unsuitable for self-study due to serious errors and deficiencies regarding patient safety. However, there is no quality control on free platforms. Accordingly, it is difficult to identify suitable videos for educational purposes

Rise of public e-learning opportunities in the context of COVID-19 pandemic-induced curtailment of face-to-face courses, exemplified by epidural catheterization on YouTube.

Abstract Background In the context of the coronavirus pandemic, countless face-to-face events as well as medical trainings were cancelled or moved to online courses, which resulted in increased digitalization in many areas. In the context of medical education, videos provide tremendous benefit for visualizing skills before they are practised. Methods Based on a previous investigation of video material addressing epidural catheterization available on the YouTube platform, we aimed to investigate new content produced in the context of the pandemic. Thus, a video search was conducted in May 2022. Results We identified twelve new videos since the pandemic with a significant improvement in the new content in terms of procedural items (p = 0.03) compared to the prepandemic video content. Video content released in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic was more often created by private content creators and were significantly shorter in total runtime than those from university and medical societies (p = 0.04). Conclusion The profound changes in the learning and teaching of health care education in relation to the pandemic are largely unclear. We reveal improved procedural quality of predominantly privately uploaded content despite a shortened runtime compared to the prepandemic period. This might indicate that technical and financial hurdles to producing instructional videos by discipline experts have decreased. In addition to the teaching difficulties caused by the pandemic, this change is likely to be due to validated manuals on how to create such content. The awareness that medical education needs to be improved has grown, so platforms offer specialized sublevels for high-quality medical videos