Contraceptive Use and Pregnancy Incidence Among Women Participating in an HIV Prevention Trial

BackgroundRecent HIV prevention trials required use of effective contraceptive methods to fulfill eligibility for enrollment. We compared pregnancy rates in a subset of participants enrolled in the Microbicide Trials Network protocol (MTN-003), a randomized trial of chemoprophylaxis to prevent HIV acquisition among women aged 18-45 years who initiated depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) or combined oral contraceptives (COCs) at enrollment, relative to those already using DMPA or COCs.MethodsData were analyzed from MTN-003 participants from Uganda. Before enrollment, information on contraceptive type and initiation date was obtained. Urine pregnancy tests were performed at monthly follow-up visits. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare pregnancy incidence among new users (initiated ≤60 days before enrollment) and established users (initiated >60 days before enrollment).ResultsOf 322 women enrolled, 296 were COC or DMPA users, 82 (28%) were new users, and 214 (72%) were established users. Pregnancy incidence was higher among new contraceptive users compared to established users (20.70% vs. 10.55%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.66; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.93-2.96). Among DMPA users, pregnancy incidence was 10.20% in new users versus 3.48% in established users (HR = 2.56; 95% CI 0.86-7.65). Among new COC users, pregnancy incidence was 42.67% in new users versus 23.67% in established COC users (adjusted HR = 1.74; 95% CI 0.87-3.48).ConclusionsNew contraceptive users, regardless of method, at the Uganda MTN-003 site had an increased pregnancy risk compared to established users, which may be due to contraceptive initiation primarily for trial eligibility. New users may benefit from intensive contraceptive counseling and additional contraceptive options, including longer acting reversible contraceptives

Differences in Cumulative Exposure and Adherence to Tenofovir in the VOICE, iPrEx OLE, and PrEP Demo Studies as Determined via Hair Concentrations

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)/emtricitabine (FTC) prevented HIV acquisition among men and women in several trials and is broadly recommended. In the VOICE and FEM-PrEP trials, however, TDF/FTC-based PrEP did not prevent HIV acquisition among women in eastern and southern Africa. Tenofovir was detected in plasma, reflecting exposure and adherence in recent days, in fewer than one-third of participants. Drug concentrations in hair, which represent cumulative exposure and adherence over weeks to months, have never previously been examined among women on PrEP. We compared tenofovir hair concentrations among women assigned to oral TDF/FTC in the VOICE trial to those among men and transgender women enrolled in 2 open-label PrEP studies, the iPrEx open-label extension (OLE) study and the U.S. PrEP Demonstration Project (PrEP Demo). Tenofovir hair concentrations were detectable in 55% of person-visits in VOICE, 75% of person-visits in iPrEx OLE (p = .006), and 98% of person-visits in PrEP Demo (p < .001). Median tenofovir hair concentrations corresponded to an estimated 0.2, 2.9, and 6.0 TDF/FTC doses taken per week in the three studies, respectively. In VOICE, combining tenofovir concentration data from plasma and hair suggested inconsistent, low-level product use. Incorporation of both short- and long-term adherence measures may allow for an improved understanding of patterns of drug-taking among women during global PrEP roll-out

Differences in Cumulative Exposure and Adherence to Tenofovir in the VOICE, iPrEx OLE, and PrEP Demo Studies as Determined via Hair Concentrations.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)/emtricitabine (FTC) prevented HIV acquisition among men and women in several trials and is broadly recommended. In the VOICE and FEM-PrEP trials, however, TDF/FTC-based PrEP did not prevent HIV acquisition among women in eastern and southern Africa. Tenofovir was detected in plasma, reflecting exposure and adherence in recent days, in fewer than one-third of participants. Drug concentrations in hair, which represent cumulative exposure and adherence over weeks to months, have never previously been examined among women on PrEP. We compared tenofovir hair concentrations among women assigned to oral TDF/FTC in the VOICE trial to those among men and transgender women enrolled in 2 open-label PrEP studies, the iPrEx open-label extension (OLE) study and the U.S. PrEP Demonstration Project (PrEP Demo). Tenofovir hair concentrations were detectable in 55% of person-visits in VOICE, 75% of person-visits in iPrEx OLE (p = .006), and 98% of person-visits in PrEP Demo (p < .001). Median tenofovir hair concentrations corresponded to an estimated 0.2, 2.9, and 6.0 TDF/FTC doses taken per week in the three studies, respectively. In VOICE, combining tenofovir concentration data from plasma and hair suggested inconsistent, low-level product use. Incorporation of both short- and long-term adherence measures may allow for an improved understanding of patterns of drug-taking among women during global PrEP roll-out