Valutazione dell'espressione dei markers neuroendocrini, del Mib-1, della p53 e del Bcl.2 nelle neoplasie non a piccole cellule del polmone con particolare riferimento ai carcinoidi atipici

Dottorato di ricerca in patologia umana. 7. ciclo. A.a. 1994-95. Coordinatore G. P. TrentiniConsiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche - Biblioteca Centrale - P.le Aldo Moro, 7, Rome; Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale - P.za Cavalleggeri, 1, Florence / CNR - Consiglio Nazionale delle RichercheSIGLEITItal

Pathologic comparison of conventional video-assisted thoracic surgical (VATS) biopsy versus non-intubated/"awake" biopsy in fibrosing interstitial lung diseases

: Surgical lung biopsy remains the standard procedure for the subset of patients with fibrosing interstitial lung disease (F-ILD) who require a lung biopsy to secure a confident diagnosis. Little is known about the pathologic features of samples obtained via non-intubated/"awake" surgical lung biopsy and the diagnostic accuracy of awake biopsy in patients with F-ILD. Two expert thoracic pathologists blinded to the type of lung biopsy compared the clinical-pathologic features of 120 conventional VATS biopsies with those of 21 consecutive non-intubated/"awake" VATS biopsies. No statistically significant differences between the two procedures were observed with regard to identification of histopathological features. Biopsy length, average of sampled lobes and mean number of slides were similar with the two procedures, while the width of the biopsies was significantly deeper with conventional VATS (31.5 mm versus 25.6 mm; p = 0.01). By contrast, the mean age of patients (69.5 versus 64.5 years; p = 0.02) and the level of diagnostic confidence (100% versus 75%; p = 0.007) were significantly higher among patients undergoing the "awake" procedure. Diagnostic yield was 100% in both groups, with a similar distribution of ILD diagnoses. Non-intubated/"awake" biopsy has the potential to become the standard surgical procedure in patients with F-ILD requiring a histological confirmation of their diagnosis. However, larger prospective studies are needed to validate the safety and diagnostic yield of "awake" compared to conventional VATS

Diffuse Pulmonary Meningotheliomatosis: Clinic-Pathologic Entity or Indolent Metastasis from Meningioma (or Both)?

Pulmonary minute meningothelial-like nodules (MMNs) are common incidental findings in surgical specimens, consisting of tiny proliferation (usually no larger than 5–6 mm) of bland-looking meningothelial cells showing a perivenular and interstitial distribution, sharing morphologic, ultrastructural, and immunohistochemical profiles with meningiomas. The identification of multiple bilateral MMNs leading to an interstitial lung disease characterized by diffuse and micronodular/miliariform patterns radiologically allows the diagnosis of diffuse pulmonary meningotheliomatosis (DPM). Nevertheless, the lung is the most common site of metastatic primary intracranial meningioma, and differential diagnosis with DPM may be impossible without clinic–radiologic integration. Herein, we report four cases (three females; mean age, 57.5 years) fitting the criteria of DPM, all incidentally discovered and histologically evidenced on transbronchial biopsy (2) and surgical resection (2). All cases showed immunohistochemical expression of epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), progesterone receptor, and CD56. Notably, three of these patients had a proven or radiologically suspected intracranial meningioma; in two cases, it was discovered before, and in one case, after the diagnosis of DPM. An extensive literature review (44 patients with DPM) revealed similar cases with imaging studies excluding intracranial meningioma in only 9% (4 of 44 cases studied). The diagnosis of DPM requires close correlation with the clinic–radiologic data since a subset of cases coexist with or follow a previously diagnosed intracranial meningioma and, thus, may represent incidental and indolent metastatic deposits of meningioma

Clinicopathological Features of Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma with BRAF Mutation

(1) Background: BRAF mutations affect 4–5% of lung adenocarcinomas. This study aimed to analyze the clinicopathological features of lung carcinomas with BRAF mutations, focusing on V600E vs. non-V600E and the presence of co-mutations. (2) Methods: All BRAF-mutated lung carcinomas were retrieved from a molecular diagnostic unit (the reference unit for four different hospitals). The samples were analyzed using next-generation sequencing. Statistical analyses included log-rank tests for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). (3) Results: In total, 60 BRAF-mutated lung carcinomas were retrieved: 24 (40.0%) with V600E and 36 (60.0%) with non-V600E mutations, and 21 (35.0%) with other co-mutations and 39 (65.0%) with only BRAF mutations. Survival data were available for 54/60 (90.0%) cases. Targeted therapy was documented in 11 cases. Patients with V600E mutations exhibited a better prognosis than patients with non-V600E mutations (p = 0.008 for OS, p = 0.018 for PFS); this was confirmed in PFS (p = 0.036) when considering only patients who received no targeted therapy. Patients with co-mutations displayed no prognostic difference compared to patients carrying only BRAF mutations (p = 0.590 for OS, p = 0.938 for PFS). (4) Conclusions: BRAF-mutated lung carcinomas with V600E (40.0%) had a better prognosis than those without V600E. Concomitant co-mutations (35.0%) did not affect the prognosis

A commentary on interstitial pneumonitis induced by docetaxel: Clinical cases and systematic review of the literature

Background: Pulmonary toxicity is a well-known complication observed with several anticancer drugs. Docetaxel, a taxane chemotherapy drug widely used in the treatment of many types of solid tumors including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), rarely causes infiltrative pneumonitis. The exact mechanism by which docetaxel develops this side effect is not well understood; probably it is produced by type I and IV hypersensitivity responses. Here we describe 2 cases of infiltrative pneumonitis induced by docetaxel as second-line chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC. Materials and Methods: Two patients with advanced NSCLC were treated with weekly docetaxel as second-line chemotherapy. After 3 courses of chemotherapy, restaging computed tomography (CT) of the chest revealed bilateral diffuse ground-glass opacities with a peribronchial distribution possibly indicative of hypersensitivity pneumonitis. No evidence of pulmonary embolus or pleural effusion was found. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy showed normal bronchi without lymphangitis; biopsies showed interstitial fibrosis without tumor cells. Bronchial tissue laboratory tests for fungi or bacilli were negative. No malignant cells were found at bronchoalveolar lavage. The patients were given high-dose corticosteroid therapy with prednisone 0.7 mg per kilogram per day. Results: After 1 month of therapy, contrast-enhanced chest CT showed complete disappearance of the pulmonary changes in both patients. Spirometry and blood gas analysis revealed complete recovery of pulmonary function. The patients continued their oncological follow-up program. Conclusions: Pulmonary injury is a rare adverse event during docetaxel chemotherapy. Prompt treatment with high-dose corticosteroids is needed to avoid worsening of respiratory performance