Patient\u27s informational needs and outreach preferences: A cross-sectional survey study in patients with hepatobiliary malignancies.

OBJECTIVE: Hepatobiliary tumors have evolving management guidelines. Patient educational needs and interest in community engagement are unknown. This study serves as a needs assessment. METHODS: A prospective, needs assessment, survey study of hepatobiliary patients was performed (2016-2019). Surveys ( RESULTS: Seventy patients completed the survey (response rate = 41.4%). Most patients had completed surgical treatment (84.3%). C CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary care is complex and difficult for patients to navigate. Most patients have interest in educational resources and prefer online modalities. Patients understand multidisciplinary tumor boards, but communication could be improved. INNOVATION: These data inform a new, innovative, approach to outreach efforts in this population

Anatomic patterns of recurrence in biliary tract cancers: does primary tumor site matter?

BACKGROUND: Recommendations for postoperative surveillance and adjuvant therapy following curative-intent resection for biliary tract cancers-including intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCCA and EHCCA) and primary gallbladder cancer (GBC)-are uniform across primary tumor site. However, these tumors may have distinct patterns of recurrence. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was performed at a specialty cancer center. Patients undergoing resection of IHCCA, EHCCA, and GBC were identified (2005-2020). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard methods. Anatomic patterns of initial site of recurrence were described and compared. RESULTS: There were 142 patients included; 50 IHCCA, 32 EHCCA, and 60 GBC. Median RFS was 30.8 months, which was not significantly different between IHCCA, EHCCA, or GBC in univariate analysis or after adjustment. Nodal positivity was significantly associated with poor RFS (HR 3.92, P≤0.001). The most common initial site of recurrence overall was intrahepatic (n=49/64, 77%), in isolation (n=32) or synchronous with other site of recurrence (n=17). Significant differences in anatomic pattern of recurrence were observed (P=0.049) with IHCCAs more commonly recurring with simultaneous hepatic-pulmonary disease (n=5/22, 23%; EHCCA n=2/19, 10%; GBC n=1/23, 4%), GBC more commonly recurring within the porta (n=7/23, 30%; IHCCA n=0; EHCCA n=1/19, 5%), and EHCCA more commonly recurring within the peritoneum (n=5/19, 26%; IHCCA n=2/22, 9%, GBC n=2/23, 9%). CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of initial recurrence appear to differ between primary tumor site, likely reflecting underlying differences in anatomy and biology. These data could help inform future studies for adjuvant therapy as well as timing and anatomic focus for surveillance imaging

A Mathematical Model to Estimate Chemotherapy Concentration at the Tumor-Site and Predict Therapy Response in Colorectal Cancer Patients with Liver Metastases

Chemotherapy remains a primary treatment for metastatic cancer, with tumor response being the benchmark outcome marker. However, therapeutic response in cancer is unpredictable due to heterogeneity in drug delivery from systemic circulation to solid tumors. In this proof-of-concept study, we evaluated chemotherapy concentration at the tumor-site and its association with therapy response by applying a mathematical model. By using pre-treatment imaging, clinical and biologic variables, and chemotherapy regimen to inform the model, we estimated tumor-site chemotherapy concentration in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases, who received treatment prior to surgical hepatic resection with curative-intent. The differential response to therapy in resected specimens, measured with the gold-standard Tumor Regression Grade (TRG; from 1, complete response to 5, no response) was examined, relative to the model predicted systemic and tumor-site chemotherapy concentrations. We found that the average calculated plasma concentration of the cytotoxic drug was essentially equivalent across patients exhibiting different TRGs, while the estimated tumor-site chemotherapeutic concentration (eTSCC) showed a quadratic decline from TRG = 1 to TRG = 5 (p < 0.001). The eTSCC was significantly lower than the observed plasma concentration and dropped by a factor of ~5 between patients with complete response (TRG = 1) and those with no response (TRG = 5), while the plasma concentration remained stable across TRG groups. TRG variations were driven and predicted by differences in tumor perfusion and eTSCC. If confirmed in carefully planned prospective studies, these findings will form the basis of a paradigm shift in the care of patients with potentially curable colorectal cancer and liver metastases

A Mathematical Model to Estimate Chemotherapy Concentration at the Tumor-Site and Predict Therapy Response in Colorectal Cancer Patients with Liver Metastases

Chemotherapy remains a primary treatment for metastatic cancer, with tumor response being the benchmark outcome marker. However, therapeutic response in cancer is unpredictable due to heterogeneity in drug delivery from systemic circulation to solid tumors. In this proof-of-concept study, we evaluated chemotherapy concentration at the tumor-site and its association with therapy response by applying a mathematical model. By using pre-treatment imaging, clinical and biologic variables, and chemotherapy regimen to inform the model, we estimated tumor-site chemotherapy concentration in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases, who received treatment prior to surgical hepatic resection with curative-intent. The differential response to therapy in resected specimens, measured with the gold-standard Tumor Regression Grade (TRG; from 1, complete response to 5, no response) was examined, relative to the model predicted systemic and tumor-site chemotherapy concentrations. We found that the average calculated plasma concentration of the cytotoxic drug was essentially equivalent across patients exhibiting different TRGs, while the estimated tumor-site chemotherapeutic concentration (eTSCC) showed a quadratic decline from TRG = 1 to TRG = 5 (p < 0.001). The eTSCC was significantly lower than the observed plasma concentration and dropped by a factor of ~5 between patients with complete response (TRG = 1) and those with no response (TRG = 5), while the plasma concentration remained stable across TRG groups. TRG variations were driven and predicted by differences in tumor perfusion and eTSCC. If confirmed in carefully planned prospective studies, these findings will form the basis of a paradigm shift in the care of patients with potentially curable colorectal cancer and liver metastases