The impact of cold ischaemia time on outcomes of living donor kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Studies have been carried out to investigate the effect of a prolonged cold ischaemia time (CIT) on the outcomes of living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). There is no clear consensus in the literature about the effects of CIT on LDKT outcomes, and therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide evidence on this subject. Searches were performed in five databases up to 12 July 2021. Articles comparing different CIT in LDKT describing delayed graft function (DGF), graft and patient survival, and acute rejection were considered for inclusion. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42019131438. In total, 1452 articles were found, of which eight were finally eligible, including a total of 164,179 patients. Meta-analyses showed significantly lower incidence of DGF (odds ratio (OR) = 0.61, p < 0.01), and significantly higher 1-year graft survival (OR = 0.72, p < 0.001) and 5-year graft survival (OR = 0.88, p = 0.04), for CIT of less than 4 h. Our results underline the need to keep CIT as short as possible in LDKT (ideally < 4 h), as a shorter CIT in LDKT is associated with a statistically significant lower incidence of DGF and higher graft survival compared to a prolonged CIT. However, clinical impact seems limited, and therefore, in LDKT programmes in which the CIT might be prolonged, such as kidney exchange programmes, the benefits outweigh the risks. To minimize these risks, it is worth considering including CIT in kidney allocation algorithms and in general take precautions to protect high risk donor/recipient combinations

Ureteral Reconstruction after Renal Transplantation: Clinical Outcome and Risk Factors

Introduction: The incidence of urological complications after renal transplantation ranges from 2.5 to 30%. Often surgical revision is necessary. The risk factors for surgical revision and which surgical techniques to apply are not elucidated. This study investigates the outcome and risk factors for surgical revision of the ureterocystostomy. Materials and Methods: Between January 1995 and March 2009, 1,157 consecutive kidney transplantations were performed. All patient charts and surgical reports were reviewed. Results: Urological complications occurred in 142 (12.3%) patients. In 60 patients (5.2%) surgical revision was necessary. Of these 60 patients, 43 (71.7%) received neoureterocystostomy, 10 (16.7%) ureteropyelostomy reconstruction and 7 (11.7%) other techniques. Independent risk factors for surgical revision were donor ureteral reconstruction (odds ratio (OR) 48.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.01-472.97), recipient age <18 years (OR 4.85, 95% CI 1.50-15.72) and delayed graft function (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.36-5.36). Ureteral stenting was a protective factor for surgical revision (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.12-0.81). The urological complication rates after neoureterocystostomy, ureteropyelostomy reconstruction and other techniques were 16, 0 and 0%, respectively. The overall surgical success rate was 92%. Conclusions: Ureteral stenting, recipient age, delayed graft function and perioperative ureteral reconstruction are significant factors associated with surgical revision of the ureterocystostomy. Surgical revision of the ureterocystostomy is a successful therapy with a low recurrence rate. Copyright (C) 2012 S. Karger AG, Base

Improved survival after LTx-associated acute GVHD with mAb therapy targeting IL2RAb and soluble TNFAb: Single-center experience and systematic review

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after liver transplant (LTx) is a rare complication with a high mortality rate. Recently, monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatment, specifically with anti-interleukin 2 receptor antibodies (IL2RAb) and anti-tumor necrosis factor-α antibodies (TNFAb), has gained increasing interest. However, evidence is mostly limited to case reports and the efficacy remains unclear. Here, we describe 5 patients with LTx-associated GVHD from our center and provide the results of our systematic literature review to evaluate the potential therapeutic benefit of IL2RAb/TNFAb treatment. Of the combined population of 155 patients (5 in our center and 150 through systematic search), 24 were given mAb (15.5%)-4 with TNFAb (2.6%) and 17 with IL2RAb (11%) ("mAb group")-and compared with patients who received other treatments (referred to as "no-mAb group"). Two-sided Fisher exact tests revealed a better survival when comparing treatment with mAb versus no-mAb (11/24 vs 27/131; P = .018), TNFAb versus no-mAb (3/4 vs 27/131; P = .034), and IL2RAb versus no-mAb (8/17 vs 27/131; P = .029). This systematic review suggests a beneficial effect of mAb treatment and a promising role for TNFAb and IL2RAb as a first-line strategy to treat LTx-associated acute GVHD.status: publishe