Evaluation of neurodevelopmental impairments and risk factors in children following cardiac surgery: The first cohort from ChinaCentral MessagePerspective

Objective: Neurodevelopmental impairment has been realized as the most common complication in children with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiac surgery during the past 30 years. But little attention has been paid to this problem in China. The potential risk factors for adverse outcomes include demographic, perioperative, and socioeconomic factors, which are vastly different in China compared with the developed countries in previous reports. Methods: Four hundred twenty-six patients (aged 35.9 ± 18.6 months) at about 1- to 3-year follow-up after cardiac surgery were prospectively enrolled from March 2019 to February 2022. Griffiths Mental Development Scales-Chinese was used to evaluate the quotients of overall development and 5 subscales of the child's locomotor, language, personal-social, eye-hand coordination, and performance skills. Demographic, perioperative, socioeconomic, and feeding type during the first year of life (breastfeeding, mixed, or never breastfeeding) were examined to identify the risk factors for adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes. Results: Mean scores were 90.0 ± 15.5 for development quotient, 92.3 ± 19.4 for locomotor, 89.6 ± 19.2 for personal-social, 85.5 ± 21.7 for language, 90.3 ± 17.2 for eye-hand coordination, and 92 ± 17.1 for performance subscales. For the entire cohort, the impairment in at least 1 subscale was found in 76.1% of the cohort (>1 SD below population mean) with 50.1% being severe (>2 SDs below the mean). The significant risk factors included prolonged hospital stay, peak level of postoperative C-reactive protein, socioeconomic status, and never breastfeeding or mixed feeding. Conclusions: Neurodevelopmental impairment is substantial in terms of incidence and severity in children with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiac surgery in China. Risk factors contributing to the adverse outcomes included prolonged hospital stay, early postoperative inflammatory response, socioeconomic status, and never breastfeeding or mixed feeding. There is an urgent need for standardized follow-up and neurodevelopmental assessment in this special group of children in China

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field