7 research outputs found

    Antibacterial Activity of THAM Trisphenylguanide against Methicillin-Resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>

    No full text
    <div><p>This study investigated the potential antibacterial activity of three series of compounds synthesized from 12 linear and branched polyamines with 2–8 amino groups, which were substituted to produce the corresponding guanides, biguanides, or phenylguanides, against <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i>, <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>, <i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> and <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>. Antibacterial activity was measured for each compound by determining the minimum inhibitory concentration against the bacteria, and the toxicity towards mammalian cells was determined. The most effective compound, THAM trisphenylguanide, was studied in time-to-kill and cytoplasmic leakage assays against methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA, USA300) in comparison to chlorhexidine. Preliminary toxicity and MRSA challenge studies in mice were also conducted on this compound. THAM trisphenylguanide showed significant antibacterial activity (MIC ∼1 mg/L) and selectivity against MRSA relative to all the other bacteria examined. In time-to-kill assays it showed increased antimicrobial activity against MRSA versus chlorhexidine. It induced leakage of cytoplasmic content at concentrations that did not reduce cell viability, suggesting the mechanism of action may involve membrane disruption. Using an intraperitoneal mouse model of invasive MRSA disease, THAM trisphenylguanide reduced bacterial burden locally and in deeper tissues. This study has identified a novel guanide compound with selective microbicidal activity against <i>Staphylococcus aureus,</i> including a methicillin-resistant (MRSA) strain.</p></div

    Time-to-kill assays.

    No full text
    <p>MRSA (a–b) and <i>E. coli</i> (c–d) treated with chlorhexidine (a, c) and THAM-3ФG (b, d). Significant differences between THAM-3ФG and chlorhexidine treatments were only seen at 4×MIC at 4 and 6 h with MRSA (p-value<0.01) and at 1 and 2 h with <i>E. coli</i> (p-value<0.05). P-values were calculated for each time point and between compounds by one-way ANOVA.</p

    THAM-3ΦG reduces MRSA burden in vivo during peritonitis.

    No full text
    <p>Mice were treated with PBS control or with THAM trisphenylguanide immediately after or at one hour post intraperitoneal infection. Bacterial burden was evaluated in the kidney (A) and heart (B); localized infection was assessed with peritoneal lavage fluid (C). The horizontal bar is the mean of the eight mice per treatment group; error bars represent standard error of the mean. Reductions in burden were significant (t-test) in kidneys for both the 1 hr (p = 0.028) and 0 hr (p = 2×10<sup>−6</sup>) treatments. Reductions were significant in the heart (p = 4×10<sup>−5</sup>) and IP lavage (p = 6×10<sup>−8</sup>) only for the 0 hr treatments.</p

    Median MICs and MBCs for chlorhexidine and THAM-3ΦG in MHB.

    No full text
    <p>There were no significant differences between MIC and MBC for each <i>S. aureus</i> strain and no significant differences between the two <i>S. aureus</i> strains using 2-tailed unpaired T-tests (p>0.05, n≥7).</p
    corecore