21 research outputs found

    Time-dependent expression of the death and the decoy receptors at the surface of HCT116 p53<sup>+/+</sup> and p53 null cells treated by bortezomib and TRAIL (or DR5-B).

    No full text
    <p>In all experiments, cells were treated with 1 nM bortezomib and 1 ng/ml TRAIL variants alone or in combination. (A) Profiles of the death receptors at the cell surface. (B) Profiles of the decoy receptors at the cell surface. (C) Relative level of death and decoy receptors membrane expression in cells during combined treatment with TRAIL variants and bortezomib. Values in all experiments are mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments.</p

    Inhibition of bortezomib and TRAIL induced DR4 internalization by z-VAD-FMK.

    No full text
    <p>DR4 receptor cell surface expression and viability of the HCT116 p53<sup>+/+</sup> cells were analyzed after incubation with 10 µM z-VAD-FMK for 1 h following treatments with TRAIL (1 ng/ml) and bortezomib (1 nM) or in combination of the two drugs.</p

    The content of death and decoy receptors in total cell extracts of HCT116 p53<sup>+/+</sup> and HCT116 p53<sup>−/−</sup> cells treated by TRAIL, bortezomib or by combination of both drugs.

    No full text
    <p>HCT116 p53<sup>+/+</sup> (A) and HCT116 p53<sup>−/−</sup> (B) cells were treated with TRAIL (1 ng/ml), bortezomib (1 nM), or by combination of both drugs for various time periods and the content of receptors in total cell extract was determined by Western blot analysis using appropriate biotinylated antibodies to each receptor. Densitometric analysis of three independent experiments was performed using ImageJ software. Values in all experiments are mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments.</p

    Contribution of death receptors DR4 and DR5 in TRAIL-mediated cell death in HCT116 p53<sup>+/+</sup> and HCT116 p53<sup>−/−</sup> cells.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Levels of constitutive surface expression of the death and the decoy receptors in HCT116 cells as determined by flow cytometry. (B) Cells were pre-incubated with 20 µg/ml antagonistic antibodies to death and decoy receptors or IgG1 control for 1 h following 4 h treatment with TRAIL or DR5-B (1 µg/ml) and cell death was determined by MTT test. Values are mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments.</p

    Inhibition of bortezomib and TRAIL induced DR4 internalization by E-64 in HCT116 p53<sup>−/−</sup> cells.

    No full text
    <p>(A) DR4 and DR5 receptors cell surface expression was analyzed after incubation of the cells with E-64 (25 µM) for 1 h following medium change and treatment with TRAIL (1 ng/ml), bortezomib (1 nM) or in combination of the two drugs for 24 h. (B) Cells were treated as in (A) and the expression of DR4 and DR5 receptors in total cell extract was determined by Western blot analysis using appropriate biotinylated antibodies. Densitometric analysis of three independent experiments was performed using ImageJ software. (C) Inhibition of bortezomib and TRAIL induced cell death by E-64 in the cells was determined by MTT test. Values in all experiments are mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments.</p

    Time-depended influence of bortezomib on TRAIL or DR5-B mediated cell death in HCT116 p53<sup>+/+</sup> and HCT116 p53<sup>−/−</sup> cells.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Viability of the cells treated with different concentrations of TRAIL or DR5-B during 8, 16, 20 and 24 h of incubation. (B) Viability of the cells treated with 1 nM bortezomib and different concentrations of TRAIL or DR5-B during 8, 16, 20 and 24 h of incubation. (C) Cells were incubated with different concentrations of bortezomib and cell death was measured after 24 h of incubation. (D) Calculation of effective concentrations of TRAIL variants after 24 h treatment of cells with 1 nM bortezomib. Values are mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments.</p

    Confocal microscopic analysis of death and decoy receptors localization in HCT116 p53<sup>−/−</sup> cells treated with TRAIL and bortezomib for indicated periods. Scale bar  = 10 µm.

    No full text
    <p>Cells were grown for different periods in the presence of indicated reagents, washed with PBS, fixed in 3% paraformaldehyde for 30 min, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 min and blocked in 3% BSA for 30 min. FITC-conjugated antibodies to DR4, DR5, DcR1 and DcR2 receptors (Abnova) were added at dilution 1∶100 and cells were incubated for 1 h in the presence of Hoerst 33342 for visualization of cell nuclei. Then non-specific bound antibodies were washed with blocking buffer containing 0.1% of Triton X-100. Cells were visualized in 0.6- µm sections using an inverted Nikon Eclipse TE2000-E laser scanning confocal microscope under a ×60 oil immersion objective.</p

    Inhibition of lysosomal activity by Baf-A1 prevented TRAIL and bortezomib induced DR4 internalization.

    No full text
    <p>(A) DR4 and DR5 receptors cell surface expression was analyzed in HCT116 p53<sup>−/−</sup> cells pretreated with Baf-A1 (25 µM) for 1 h following bortezomib (1 nM) and TRAIL (1 ng/ml) treatment alone or in combination for 24 h. (B) Viability of the cells treated as in (A) was determined by MTT test. Values in all experiments are mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments.</p

    Dissecting structural basis of the unique substrate selectivity of human enteropeptidase catalytic subunit

    No full text
    <div><p>Enteropeptidase is a key enzyme in the digestion system of higher animals. It initiates enzymatic cascade cleaving trypsinogen activation peptide after a unique sequence DDDDK. Recently, we have found specific activity of human enteropeptidase catalytic subunit (L-HEP) being significantly higher than that of its bovine ortholog (L-BEP). Moreover, we have discovered that L-HEP hydrolyzed several nonspecific peptidic substrates. In this work, we aimed to further characterize species-specific enteropeptidase activities and to reveal their structural basis. First, we compared hydrolysis of peptides and proteins lacking DDDDK sequence by L-HEP and L-BEP. In each case human enzyme was more efficient, with the highest hydrolysis rate observed for substrates with a large hydrophobic residue in P2-position. Computer modeling suggested enzyme exosite residues 96 (Arg in L-HEP, Lys in L-BEP) and 219 (Lys in L-HEP, Gln in L-BEP) to be responsible for these differences in enteropeptidase catalytic activity. Indeed, human-to-bovine mutations Arg96Lys, Lys219Gln shifted catalytic properties of L-HEP toward those of L-BEP. This effect was amplified in case of the double mutation Arg96Lys/Lys219Gln, but still did not cover the full difference in catalytic activities of human and bovine enzymes. To find a missing link, we studied monopeptide benzyl-arginine-β-naphthylamide hydrolysis. L-HEP catalyzed it with an order lower <i>K</i><sub>m</sub> than L-BEP, suggesting the monopeptide-binding S1 site input into catalytic distinction between two enteropeptidase species. Together, our findings suggest structural basis of the unique catalytic properties of human enteropeptidase and instigate further studies of its tentative physiological and pathological roles.</p> </div

    Resonance Raman study of reduced cytochromes.

    No full text
    <p>The RRS spectra of the studied cytochromes in the reduced state: WT—wild type; M1—T78N/K79Y/M80I/I81M/F82N, M2—T78S/K79P, M3—I81Y/A83Y/G84N. For clearer presentation, the spectra are shifted in vertical position. X axis is a frequency shift, cm<sup>-1</sup> and Y axis is RRS intensity, a.u.</p
    corecore