EndNote for iPad (version 2.4)

EndNote for iPad is the tablet companion to the EndNote citation manager from Clarivate Analytics (formerly produced by Thomson Reuters)

Burnout among medical and health sciences information professionals who support systematic reviews: an exploratory study

Objective: The aim of this exploratory study was to assess personal, work-related, and client-related burnout among information professionals who support systematic review (SR) work. Methods: The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory, a validated tool for assessing burnout, was administered to information professionals who support SR work. A broad range of health sciences or medical librarians and information professionals were targeted via professional email discussion lists and news outlets. Questionnaire responses were captured electronically using Qualtrics Survey Software and quantitatively analyzed. Results: Respondents experienced an average personal burnout score of 48.6, work-related score of 46.4, and client-related score of 32.5 out of 100. Respondents who reported spending >80% of their job duties on SR work had significantly lower personal burnout scores than those who reported spending <10% of their job duties on SR work (average, 31.5 versus 50.9, respectively). Also, respondents who reported using an SR support tool had significantly lower personal burnout scores than those who reported sometimes using a tool (average, 43.7 versus 54.7, respectively). Conclusion: The results suggest that information professionals who dedicate more time to SR work or who consistently use an SR support tool experience less burnout. This study provides groundwork for further investigation with the aim of developing approaches to prevent or combat SR-related burnout among information professionals

Tech Tuesday - Predatory Journals and Publishers

Recording of Tech Tuesday session originally presented Tuesday, July 21 2020. Presenter: Michelle Demetres, Samuel J. Wood Library. Predatory journals or publishers have taken advantage of the pay-to-publish model, scamming authors out of publishing fees, and publishing articles with little to no peer review. In this session, we'll help define what it means to be "predatory," as well as introduce critical appraisal "red flags" so you can identify and avoid these publishing outlets.1_h36y96m

Protocol: The role of elevated ambient CO2 in altering the stability of medications

Systematic Review Protoco

Protocol: Artificial Intelligence in Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Scoping Review

Protocol for "Artificial Intelligence in Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Scoping Review