20 research outputs found

    Additional file 1: of Physiological fidelity or model parsimony? The relative performance of reverse-toxicokinetic modeling approaches

    No full text
    Supplemental Information. Additional information including supporting figures, the generalized conceptual model for an organ with metabolism, detailed descriptions of the toxicokinetic models, a comparison of the 7C model to the original Zebrafish PBTK on which it was based, results of sensitivity analyses of the PBTK models, detailed descriptions of the reverse toxicokinetic models, an analytical approach to determining the influence of architecture on steady state concentrations, and an approximation of the departure of in vitro data from control levels. (PDF 1762 kb

    Additional file 1: of Statistical relationship between metabolic decomposition and chemical uptake predicts bioconcentration factor data for diverse chemical exposures

    No full text
    Supporting Information includes all Supporting Figures and a complete description of the derivation and parameterization of the models used in this work. (PDF 734 kb

    Additional file 2: of Statistical relationship between metabolic decomposition and chemical uptake predicts bioconcentration factor data for diverse chemical exposures

    No full text
    Table S1 includes log10 Kow values and log10 BCF values for various chemicals as measured or derived from measurements taken in adult zebrafish. Table S2 Table S2 includes log10 Kow values and log10 BCF values for various chemicals as measured or derived from measurements taken in embryonic zebrafish. Table S3 Table S3 includes log10 Kow values and log10 BCF values for various chemicals as measured or derived from measurements taken in various other fish species. (XLSX 81 kb

    Data-Driven Method to Estimate Nonlinear Chemical Equivalence

    No full text
    <div><p>There is great need to express the impacts of chemicals found in the environment in terms of effects from alternative chemicals of interest. Methods currently employed in fields such as life-cycle assessment, risk assessment, mixtures toxicology, and pharmacology rely mostly on heuristic arguments to justify the use of linear relationships in the construction of “equivalency factors,” which aim to model these concentration-concentration correlations. However, the use of linear models, even at low concentrations, oversimplifies the nonlinear nature of the concentration-response curve, therefore introducing error into calculations involving these factors. We address this problem by reporting a method to determine a concentration-concentration relationship between two chemicals based on the full extent of experimentally derived concentration-response curves. Although this method can be easily generalized, we develop and illustrate it from the perspective of toxicology, in which we provide equations relating the sigmoid and non-monotone, or “biphasic,” responses typical of the field. The resulting concentration-concentration relationships are manifestly nonlinear for nearly any chemical level, even at the very low concentrations common to environmental measurements. We demonstrate the method using real-world examples of toxicological data which may exhibit sigmoid and biphasic mortality curves. Finally, we use our models to calculate equivalency factors, and show that traditional results are recovered only when the concentration-response curves are “parallel,” which has been noted before, but we make formal here by providing mathematical conditions on the validity of this approach.</p></div

    Survivorship data for salmon and fathead minnow.

    No full text
    <p>(Top panel) Experimental data illustrating a non-monotone survivorship curve for two species of salmon, <i>Oncorhynchus tshawytscha</i> and <i>Salmo salar</i> [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0130494#pone.0130494.ref030" target="_blank">30</a>, <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0130494#pone.0130494.ref031" target="_blank">31</a>], versus Se body-burden measured in <i>ÎĽ</i>g Se per <i>g</i> dry wt tissue. (Bottom panel) A sigmoid survivorship concentration-response curve measuring a cumulative toxic effect for Fathead minnow (<i>Pimephales promelas</i>). Data obtained from [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0130494#pone.0130494.ref033" target="_blank">33</a>].</p

    Illustration of the method used to determine chemical equivalence.

    No full text
    <p>Concentration-response functions for two chemicals, termed “reference” (left panel) and “novel” (middle panel), can be used to parameterize the relationship between chemical concentrations (right panel).</p

    Validity of the sigmoid and biphasic concentration-concentration relationships.

    No full text
    <p>(a) Validity of the analytic equations for the concentration-concentration relationship (red line) given by Eqs <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0130494#pone.0130494.e015" target="_blank">5</a>–<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0130494#pone.0130494.e038" target="_blank">18</a> in the main text, overlaid with “exact” numerical results (black line). (b) Absolute value of the relative error between the analytic equations and the exact numerical result.</p

    Survivorship data for <i>Daphnia magna</i>.

    No full text
    <p>Experimental concentration-response data from [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0130494#pone.0130494.ref025" target="_blank">25</a>] carried out on the water flea <i>Daphnia magna</i>, illustrating sigmoid survivorship curves. These data were fit to empirical sigmoid equations (solid and dotted lines).</p

    Concentration-concentration relationships derived from sigmoid survivorship data.

    No full text
    <p>Comparison between non-normalized (left panels) and normalized (right panels) concentration-concentration response functions derived from the sigmoid data of <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0130494#pone.0130494.g003" target="_blank">Fig 3</a>.</p

    Non-monotone, or “biphasic,” response function.

    No full text
    <p>Positive (red line) and negative (blue line) affectors combine to result in a biphasic response function.</p
    corecore