<b>Supplemental Material - Responding to Uncertainty: The Importance of Covertness in Support for Retaliation to Cyber and Kinetic Attacks</b>

Supplemental Material for Responding to Uncertainty: The Importance of Covertness in Support for Retaliation to Cyber and Kinetic Attacks by Michael J. Soules in Journal of Conflict Resolution</p

<b>Supplemental Material - Recruiting Rebels: Introducing the Rebel Appeals and Incentives Dataset</b>

Supplemental Material for Recruiting Rebels: Introducing the Rebel Appeals and Incentives Dataset by Michael J. Soules in Journal of Conflict Resolution</p

Prolactin secretion and corpus luteum function in women with luteal phase deficiency

Luteal phase deficiency (LPD) as a clinical infertility problem is considered to have a heterogeneous etiology. Hyperprolactinemia has long been considered a causative factor of LPD. In this context we investigated PRL secretion in 18 women with LPD. All of the subjects were infertile with 2 out of phase (greater than 2 days) endometrial biopsies; 10 of the women also had daily blood samples, this latter subgroup had significantly decreased integrated luteal phase progesterone (P) levels compared to normal women with in-phase biopsies. PRL secretion was investigated as follows: 1) daily blood levels; 2) pulsatile secretion patterns in 3 cycle phase [early follicular (12 h); late follicular (12 h); midluteal (24 h)], 3) LH-PRL coupling, and 4) nocturnal patterns. Results were compared to findings in 36 normal women. The mean daily levels of PRL over the menstrual cycle were not different between the two groups (LPD, 12.1 +/- 1.5; normal, 13.8 +/- 0.8 microgram/L; P = 0.3). There was no correlation between luteal phase integrated P and PRL levels for either group. There was a small difference in the PRL pulse amplitude in the early follicular phase between the LPD and normal women (2.6 +/- 0.3 vs. 5.5 +/- 1.3 micrograms/L; P less than 0.05). There were no significant differences between groups in PRL pulse frequency or mean level during the 12 or 24 h in any cycle phase. There was an equivalent amount of LH-PRL pulse coupling in both groups in all three cycle phases. Diurnal and nocturnal PRL secretion was studied by breaking the 24 h data (midluteal) into day (0700-2300 h) and night (2300-0700) segments. Mean PRL levels were higher at night in both groups (LPD, 15.9 vs. 12.6; normal, 15.4 vs. 9.3 micrograms/L; P less than 0.05), as expected. There were no differences in nocturnal PRL secretory patterns between the two groups. In summary, we have serious reservations whether abnormalities in PRL secretion are a common or integral part of the pathophysiology of LPD. From previous work we know these subtle abnormalities in PRL secretion in LPD are associated with definite abnormalities in gonadotropin secretion. We believe these gonadotropin abnormalities are probably more significant in terms of decreased P secretion

Abnormal patterns of pulsatile luteinizing hormone in women with luteal phase deficiency

Luteal phase deficiency is usually a problem of inadequate progesterone production associated with inadequate ovarian follicular development. The hypothesis that luteal phase deficiency results from an abnormal secretion pattern of luteinizing hormone (LH) was tested in these women. To this end, the early follicular LH secretion pattern in four women with luteal phase deficiency was characterized and compared with patterns in normal women. Blood samples were obtained through indwelling catheters every ten minutes for eight hours (10 AM to 6 PM), and plasma levels of LH and FSH were measured. Luteinizing hormone and FSH secretion profiles were analyzed for pulse frequency, amplitude, and mean plasma level. A significantly greater LH pulse frequency in women with luteal phase deficiency was observed when compared with the frequency in normal controls (luteal phase deficiency, 10.5 pulses/eight hours; normal, 5.2 pulses/eight hours; P less than or equal to .05). The mean FSH concentration was less in the women with luteal phase deficiency, but the level was not significant. These data suggest that the abnormal LH secretion pattern observed in women with luteal phase deficiency is responsible for their inadequate luteal phase progesterone secretion and their infertility

Corpus luteum insufficiency induced by a rapid gonadotropin-releasing hormone-induced gonadotropin secretion pattern in the follicular phase

The pulse frequency of LH and FSH (and by inference, GnRH) is a major determinant of the relative baseline plasma levels of LH and FSH. Luteal phase deficiency has been reported to be associated with increased gonadotropin pulse frequency and inadequate preovulatory follicular development. In this study we induced in normal women a supraphysiological gonadotropin pulse frequency in the follicular phase to determine its effect on follicular development and corpus luteum function. Specifically, we tested the hypothesis that a supraphysiological GnRH pulse frequency would result in deficient luteal phase production of progesterone. The subjects were six normal ovulatory women (age range, 23-35 yr). They were initially studied during a control cycle (cycle 1). Then, 25 ng/kg GnRH was administered iv every 30 min from the early follicular phase of the next cycle (cycle 2) until ovulation occurred. GnRH administration resulted in increased follicular phase plasma LH and FSH levels and LH to FSH ratios, multiple preovulatory follicles (mean, 2.8) with increased mean integrated estradiol [1302 (pg/mL)day (cycle 1) vs. 2550 (pg/mL)day (cycle 2); P less than 0.05; 4780 vs. 9360 (pmol/L)day, Systeme International units], spontaneous ovulation, decreased luteal phase plasma immunoreactive and bioactive LH levels, decreased luteal phase length [13.5 days (cycle 1) vs. 8.8 days (cycle 2); P less than 0.05], and decreased mean integrated progesterone secretion [152 (ng/mL)day (cycle 1) vs. 66 (ng/mL)day (cycle 2); P less than 0.01; 482 vs. 209 (nmol/L)day, Systeme International units]. We conclude that high frequency LH and FSH secretion during the follicular phase can induce inadequate progesterone secretion during the subsequent luteal phase, and we infer that the pathophysiological basis for this induced luteal phase deficiency is decreased LH support of corpus luteum function

The effects of inducing a follicular phase gonadotropin secretory pattern in normal women during the luteal phase

It has been hypothesized that the slowing of the luteinizing hormone (LH) pulse frequency in the luteal phase may be necessary for the demise of the corpus luteum, the intercycle rise in baseline follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), or ovarian follicular development in the subsequent cycle. For assessment of the physiologic role of the luteal phase LH pulse pattern, this pattern was converted to a follicular pattern in six normal women who used exogenous gonadotropin-releasing hormone administered with a portable pump (dose 50 to 100 ng/kg subcutaneously every 90 minutes beginning in the early luteal [n = 3] and midluteal [n = 3] cycle phases). There was no significant difference between the treated and the subsequent cycle for luteal progesterone production [186.3 versus 159.0 (ng/ml) day], preovulatory follicular size (23.1 versus 22.5 mm), estradiol levels, luteal phase length (15.6 versus 14.3 days), and daily gonadotropin concentrations including the intercycle FSH rise (160.5 versus 139.1 ng/ml). A follicular phase gonadotropin pulse pattern (increased frequency, decreased amplitude) in the luteal phase had no discernible effects on the corpus luteum or on follicular development in the subsequent cycle

Ovulation induction with pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone: a study of the subcutaneous route of administration

The efficacy of ovulation induction with the use of intermittent gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) therapy was examined in seven infertile women with hypothalamic amenorrhea. GnRH was administered every 90 minutes via the subcutaneous route in doses ranging from 50 to 300 ng/kg. Analysis of the induced gonadotropin pulse pattern revealed normal to modestly increased luteinizing hormone secretory parameters (e.g., pulse amplitude) in six of the seven patients. Six of seven women and 15 of 16 treatment cycles (94%) were ovulatory. The conception rate was 43% per woman and 19% per cycle. However, detailed hormonal analysis of 13 treatment cycles revealed that only 1 cycle was entirely normal in terms of duration and/or steroid secretion