8 research outputs found

    Group data for body weight (gram) for the control group and HBOT group.

    No full text
    <p>Data are presented as means ± SEM.</p><p>Group data for body weight (gram) for the control group and HBOT group.</p

    Macroscopic images of control and HBOT wounds at post-wounding days 7 and 29.

    No full text
    <p>Macroscopic images of control and HBOT wounds at post-wounding days 7 and 29.</p

    Ratio of the skin breaking strength of normal skin and wounded skin in diabetic rats at day 29 post wounding.

    No full text
    <p>Data are presented as means ± SEM. P-values indicate differences between the control group and the HBOT group.</p

    Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy to Treat Diabetes Impaired Wound Healing in Rats

    No full text
    <div><p>Wound healing in diabetes is frequently impaired and its treatment remains a challenge. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) receives a wide attendance and is often used as a last resort treatment option, however, its effectiveness for many conditions is unproven. We tested the effect of HBOT on healing of diabetic ulcers in an animal experimental setting. Experimental diabetes was induced by intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin. Four weeks after diabetes induction, rats were ulcerated by clamping a pair of magnet disks on the dorsal skin for 16 h. After magnet removal, the animals received HBOT, daily on weekdays, for 4 weeks. To examine the effect of HBOT on diabetes impaired wound healing, the degree of wound tissue perfusion, inflammation, angiogenesis, and tissue breaking strength were evaluated. HBOT effects on the degree of inflammation and number of blood vessels could not be observed. HBOT improved the tissue breaking strength of the wound, however, this did not reach statistical significance. Twenty hours after ending the HBOT, a significantly improved oxygen saturation of the hemoglobin at the venous end of the capillaries and the quantity of hemoglobin in the micro-blood vessels was measured.</p></div

    The effect of HBOT on blood flow, oxygen saturation of the hemoglobin at the venous end of the capillaries (SO2), and the quantity of hemoglobin in the micro blood vessels (rHB).

    No full text
    <p>Effects were measured in control and HBOT animals, approximately 20 hours after the last HBOT session, and expressed as a percentage of the values of non-wounded skin in the respective animal. Data are presented as means ± SEM. P-values indicate differences between the respective control group and the HBOT group.</p

    Group data for blood glucose (mmol/L) for the control group and HBOT group.

    No full text
    <p>Data are presented as means ± SEM. A glycometer reading of 33 represents tail vein glucose levels of 33 mmol/L and above.</p><p>Group data for blood glucose (mmol/L) for the control group and HBOT group.</p

    Histological staining of control and HBOT wounds at post-wounding days 7 and 29.

    No full text
    <p>A–D) H&E staining. E–H) CD34 immunohistochemistry. I+J) CD68 immunohistochemistry.</p

    Effect of HBOT on wound tissue perfusion.

    No full text
    <p><b>A. Effect of HBOT on hemoglobin oxygen saturation at the venous end of the capillaries (SO</b><sub><b>2</b></sub><b>)</b> Oxygen saturation in the wounded and normal skin was measured in the HBOT and control animals (20 h post-HBOT). Oxygen saturation in the wound is expressed as a percentage of the flow in the normal skin of the same animal. <b>B. Effect of HBOT on quantity of hemoglobin.</b> Quantity of hemoglobin in the wounded and normal skin was measured in the HBOT and control animals (20 h post-HBOT). Quantity of hemoglobin in the wound is expressed as a percentage of the flow in the normal skin of the same animal. <b>C. Effect of HBOT on blood flow.</b> Blood flow in the wounded and normal skin was measured in the HBOT and control animals (20 h post-HBOT). Blood flow in the wound is expressed as a percentage of flow in the normal skin of the same animal. Data are shown as means ± SEM. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01 and ***p ≤ 0.001 indicate significant differences between the HBOT and control group.</p
    corecore